Understanding accounting as a social and institutional practice: possible exit of accounting science from crisis

S. Lehenchuk, I. Zhyhlei, O. Syvak
{"title":"Understanding accounting as a social and institutional practice: possible exit of accounting science from crisis","authors":"S. Lehenchuk, I. Zhyhlei, O. Syvak","doi":"10.21511/afc.03(1).2020.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article highlights the transformation of views on the understanding of accounting as a science in the new conditions for the functioning of enterprises operating in globalized markets in a dynamic competitive environment. The necessity of considering external factors (corporate scandals, financial crisis, etc.) in the development of accounting as a science is emphasized. The reasons for the need to confirm the scientific status of accounting are considered, the hypotheses concerning the gradual crowding out and replacement of accounting by information systems with artificial intelligence are refuted. Accordingly, the study aims to confirm the scientific significance of accounting and justify the need for its further development as a social science aimed at solving social issues and having a deeper social context. Various accounting models and identification of factors affecting their construction, as a result of which the goals of accounting are transformed, make the theoretical basis of this study. It is concluded that accounting is a social science that studies the features of the functioning of the accounting system as a social and institutional practice. Such an understanding of accounting science is considered one of the ways out of the existing crisis. The reasons for the lack of understanding among Ukrainian researchers of accounting as a social science are highlighted, and the ways to overcome them are suggested. It is proved that accounting, on the one hand, is a product of the social environment, an instrument for reflecting the economic reality of an enterprise. On the other hand, it influences the formation of social reality, being an instrument for shaping social processes and relations arising from the functioning of accounting as a separate socio-economic institute.","PeriodicalId":52967,"journal":{"name":"Accounting and Financial Control","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting and Financial Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/afc.03(1).2020.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This article highlights the transformation of views on the understanding of accounting as a science in the new conditions for the functioning of enterprises operating in globalized markets in a dynamic competitive environment. The necessity of considering external factors (corporate scandals, financial crisis, etc.) in the development of accounting as a science is emphasized. The reasons for the need to confirm the scientific status of accounting are considered, the hypotheses concerning the gradual crowding out and replacement of accounting by information systems with artificial intelligence are refuted. Accordingly, the study aims to confirm the scientific significance of accounting and justify the need for its further development as a social science aimed at solving social issues and having a deeper social context. Various accounting models and identification of factors affecting their construction, as a result of which the goals of accounting are transformed, make the theoretical basis of this study. It is concluded that accounting is a social science that studies the features of the functioning of the accounting system as a social and institutional practice. Such an understanding of accounting science is considered one of the ways out of the existing crisis. The reasons for the lack of understanding among Ukrainian researchers of accounting as a social science are highlighted, and the ways to overcome them are suggested. It is proved that accounting, on the one hand, is a product of the social environment, an instrument for reflecting the economic reality of an enterprise. On the other hand, it influences the formation of social reality, being an instrument for shaping social processes and relations arising from the functioning of accounting as a separate socio-economic institute.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将会计理解为一种社会和制度实践:会计科学走出危机的可能出路
本文强调了对会计作为一门科学的理解的观点的转变,在新的条件下,在全球化市场中运作的企业在动态竞争环境中运作。强调会计作为一门科学的发展需要考虑外部因素(公司丑闻、金融危机等)。分析了确认会计科学地位的必要性,驳斥了人工智能信息系统逐渐排挤和取代会计的假说。因此,本研究旨在确认会计的科学意义,并证明其作为一门旨在解决社会问题并具有更深社会背景的社会科学的进一步发展的必要性。各种会计模型及其构建影响因素的识别,从而实现会计目标的转变,是本研究的理论基础。结论是,会计是一门社会科学,研究会计制度作为社会和制度实践的功能特征。这种对会计科学的理解被认为是摆脱现有危机的途径之一。强调了乌克兰研究人员对会计作为一门社会科学缺乏了解的原因,并提出了克服这些问题的方法。事实证明,会计一方面是社会环境的产物,是反映企业经济现实的工具。另一方面,它影响社会现实的形成,是塑造社会过程和关系的工具,这些过程和关系是由会计作为一个独立的社会经济机构的功能产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Usefulness of accounting information systems for small business profitability in South Africa: A systematic literature review Analyzing the external auditor’s perception of the impact of IFRS 15 on the profitability and performance of emerging market companies Does neglecting the instruments of financial failure play a role in the bankruptcy of companies? Emerging trends and research focal points of information technologies for financial control and accounting at the state and corporate level: Bibliometric research and visualization Multi-level benchmark system for sustainability reporting: EU experience for Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1