Finland: Media welfare state in the digital era?

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION Journal of Digital Media & Policy Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1386/jdmp_00020_1
M. Ala-Fossi
{"title":"Finland: Media welfare state in the digital era?","authors":"M. Ala-Fossi","doi":"10.1386/jdmp_00020_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of media welfare state is a combination of the democratic corporatist media system and social democratic welfare state model, describing the distinctiveness of the Nordic countries and their media systems with four basic principles. Media welfare state is based on communication\n services understood as public goods, freedom from editorial interference, cultural policy and economic support for media pluralism as well as preference for consensual solutions involving cooperation between main stakeholders. However, identifying a joint media welfare state model in recent\n media and communication policy decisions made in Nordic countries on developing communication infrastructures, media delivery and universal access turns out to be difficult. During the last three decades, none of the four largest Nordic countries has strictly followed all the four principles.\n In most cases, Finland has ended up with different solutions than its Nordic neighbours and sometimes also in contradiction with the Media Welfare State model. There is evidence that the Nordic media markets have been losing their distinguishability over the years. But the main reason why\n the present-day Nordic countries do not fit into media welfare state model is that they no longer are welfare states ‐ not at least in the same fashion as they used to be. In Finland, this transition from the welfare state to the competition state has been more rapid and extensive than\n elsewhere in the Nordic region, partly because of its geopolitical position. The Finnish economy has also been exceptionally dependent on a single mobile technology corporation.","PeriodicalId":40702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Media & Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Media & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp_00020_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The concept of media welfare state is a combination of the democratic corporatist media system and social democratic welfare state model, describing the distinctiveness of the Nordic countries and their media systems with four basic principles. Media welfare state is based on communication services understood as public goods, freedom from editorial interference, cultural policy and economic support for media pluralism as well as preference for consensual solutions involving cooperation between main stakeholders. However, identifying a joint media welfare state model in recent media and communication policy decisions made in Nordic countries on developing communication infrastructures, media delivery and universal access turns out to be difficult. During the last three decades, none of the four largest Nordic countries has strictly followed all the four principles. In most cases, Finland has ended up with different solutions than its Nordic neighbours and sometimes also in contradiction with the Media Welfare State model. There is evidence that the Nordic media markets have been losing their distinguishability over the years. But the main reason why the present-day Nordic countries do not fit into media welfare state model is that they no longer are welfare states ‐ not at least in the same fashion as they used to be. In Finland, this transition from the welfare state to the competition state has been more rapid and extensive than elsewhere in the Nordic region, partly because of its geopolitical position. The Finnish economy has also been exceptionally dependent on a single mobile technology corporation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
芬兰:数字时代的媒体福利国家?
媒介福利国家的概念是民主社团主义媒介制度与社会民主主义福利国家模式的结合,用四个基本原则来描述北欧国家及其媒介制度的独特性。媒体福利国家的基础是被理解为公共产品的传播服务、不受编辑干预的自由、对媒体多元化的文化政策和经济支持,以及对涉及主要利益相关者之间合作的共识解决方案的偏好。然而,在北欧国家最近关于发展通信基础设施、媒体交付和普遍访问的媒体和通信政策决定中确定联合媒体福利国家模式是困难的。在过去三十年中,四个最大的北欧国家中没有一个严格遵守所有这四项原则。在大多数情况下,芬兰最终采取了与北欧邻国不同的解决方案,有时也与媒体福利国家模式相矛盾。有证据表明,北欧媒体市场多年来一直在失去其独特性。但是,当今北欧国家不符合媒体福利国家模式的主要原因是,它们不再是福利国家——至少不像过去那样是福利国家。在芬兰,从福利国家到竞争国家的转变比北欧地区其他国家更快、更广泛,部分原因在于其地缘政治地位。芬兰经济也特别依赖于一家移动技术公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
The concept of ‘new media’ among Jordanian news producers Digital disruption and global businesses’ viability under COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic Platform governance and the politics of media regulation: The review of the European Audiovisual Media Services Directive Intermediary roles in the transposition of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive into domestic legislation: Evidence from Spain European audiovisual media policy in the age of global video on demand services: A case study of Netflix in the Netherlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1