Towards a nuanced understanding of anti-immigration sentiment in the welfare state – a program specific analysis of welfare preferences

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Rationality and Society Pub Date : 2022-05-30 DOI:10.1177/10434631221093746
Matthias Diermeier, Judith Niehues
{"title":"Towards a nuanced understanding of anti-immigration sentiment in the welfare state – a program specific analysis of welfare preferences","authors":"Matthias Diermeier, Judith Niehues","doi":"10.1177/10434631221093746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The literature on immigration and the welfare state describes a trade-off between immigration and welfare support. We argue for a more nuanced view of welfare chauvinism that accounts for different motivational channels, specific welfare programs and particular population subgroups. First, we identify two separate characteristics of hostility towards immigrants that trigger welfare chauvinism: affective anti-migration sentiment that combines economic and cultural motives; and a ‘putative rational anti-migration sentiment’ that is driven by the fear that immigration could overburden the welfare state although immigrants themselves are not disliked or even appreciated. Second, running a program-specific analysis, we find that affective and ‘putative rational’ opposition to migration lower redistributive preferences towards the unemployed. On the contrary, affective anti-immigration sentiment even increases welfare affinity towards the elderly. We interpret this finding not as preferences for or against a specific welfare program but as implicit sympathy or antipathy for its recipients. Third, investigating the role of Populist Radical Right Parties (PRRPs) as the main source of welfare chauvinism, we find that PRRP supporters strongly prefer more redistribution towards a perceived native in-group: the elderly.","PeriodicalId":47079,"journal":{"name":"Rationality and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rationality and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10434631221093746","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The literature on immigration and the welfare state describes a trade-off between immigration and welfare support. We argue for a more nuanced view of welfare chauvinism that accounts for different motivational channels, specific welfare programs and particular population subgroups. First, we identify two separate characteristics of hostility towards immigrants that trigger welfare chauvinism: affective anti-migration sentiment that combines economic and cultural motives; and a ‘putative rational anti-migration sentiment’ that is driven by the fear that immigration could overburden the welfare state although immigrants themselves are not disliked or even appreciated. Second, running a program-specific analysis, we find that affective and ‘putative rational’ opposition to migration lower redistributive preferences towards the unemployed. On the contrary, affective anti-immigration sentiment even increases welfare affinity towards the elderly. We interpret this finding not as preferences for or against a specific welfare program but as implicit sympathy or antipathy for its recipients. Third, investigating the role of Populist Radical Right Parties (PRRPs) as the main source of welfare chauvinism, we find that PRRP supporters strongly prefer more redistribution towards a perceived native in-group: the elderly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对福利国家的反移民情绪进行细致入微的理解——对福利偏好的具体分析
关于移民和福利国家的文献描述了移民和福利支持之间的权衡。我们主张对福利沙文主义有更细致入微的看法,即考虑到不同的动机渠道、特定的福利计划和特定的人口亚群体。首先,我们确定了引发福利沙文主义的对移民敌意的两个不同特征:结合经济和文化动机的情感反移民情绪;还有一种“假定的理性反移民情绪”,这种情绪是由担心移民会给福利国家带来过重负担所驱动的,尽管移民本身并不不受欢迎,甚至也不受欢迎。其次,通过对特定项目的分析,我们发现,对移民的情感和“假定的理性”反对降低了对失业者的再分配偏好。相反,情感上的反移民情绪甚至会增加对老年人的福利亲和力。我们对这一发现的解释不是对特定福利计划的偏好或反对,而是对其接受者的隐性同情或反感。第三,通过调查民粹主义极右翼政党(PRRP)作为福利沙文主义主要来源的作用,我们发现PRRP的支持者强烈倾向于将更多的再分配给他们所认为的本土内群体:老年人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Rationality & Society focuses on the growing contributions of rational-action based theory, and the questions and controversies surrounding this growth. Why Choose Rationality and Society? The trend toward ever-greater specialization in many areas of intellectual life has lead to fragmentation that deprives scholars of the ability to communicate even in closely adjoining fields. The emergence of the rational action paradigm as the inter-lingua of the social sciences is a remarkable exception to this trend. It is the one paradigm that offers the promise of bringing greater theoretical unity across disciplines such as economics, sociology, political science, cognitive psychology, moral philosophy and law.
期刊最新文献
Is aiming high always a good thing? A behavioral model of aspiration failure with evidence from lower-secondary students in China Official media use, political participation, and government trust structure an empirical study based on the attitude of Chinese netizens Explaining mobilization for revolts by private interests and kinship relations. A comment on Armandola, Doehne and Rost Managing and aggregating group evidence under quality and quantity trade-offs Untangling expectations and sacrifices: Ultra-Orthodox men in Israel and the religious club model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1