A Qualitative Exploratory Study of Family Inclusion in Assertive Community Treatment: Challenges and Possibilities

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Families in Society-The Journal of Contemporary Social Services Pub Date : 2022-04-19 DOI:10.1177/10443894221074670
Lance T. Peterson, Michelle Gricus
{"title":"A Qualitative Exploratory Study of Family Inclusion in Assertive Community Treatment: Challenges and Possibilities","authors":"Lance T. Peterson, Michelle Gricus","doi":"10.1177/10443894221074670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to understand the unique challenges of Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) service providers to actively include natural supports in treatment. The qualitative approach was guided by the participatory intervention model and tenets of critical realism. Interviews included focus groups of different stakeholders on ACT teams (e.g., case managers) and individual interviews with ACT clients. Through thematic analysis, we identified themes demonstrating how state funding requirements, demands on staff schedules, and psychosocial barriers make it challenging to include clients’ natural supports. We derived two implications which may enhance future possibilities for natural support inclusion: community-based psychoeducation family groups coupled with state funding streams that better support the ACT model.","PeriodicalId":47463,"journal":{"name":"Families in Society-The Journal of Contemporary Social Services","volume":"104 1","pages":"111 - 124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families in Society-The Journal of Contemporary Social Services","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10443894221074670","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to understand the unique challenges of Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) service providers to actively include natural supports in treatment. The qualitative approach was guided by the participatory intervention model and tenets of critical realism. Interviews included focus groups of different stakeholders on ACT teams (e.g., case managers) and individual interviews with ACT clients. Through thematic analysis, we identified themes demonstrating how state funding requirements, demands on staff schedules, and psychosocial barriers make it challenging to include clients’ natural supports. We derived two implications which may enhance future possibilities for natural support inclusion: community-based psychoeducation family groups coupled with state funding streams that better support the ACT model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自信社区治疗中家庭包容的质性探索:挑战与可能性
本研究的目的是了解自信社区治疗(ACT)服务提供者在治疗中积极纳入自然支持的独特挑战。定性方法以参与式干预模式和批判现实主义原则为指导。访谈包括ACT团队中不同利益相关者的焦点小组(例如,案例经理)和对ACT客户的个人访谈。通过主题分析,我们确定了一些主题,这些主题展示了国家资金需求、对工作人员时间表的要求以及社会心理障碍如何使纳入客户的自然支持变得具有挑战性。我们得出了两个可能增强自然支持纳入未来可能性的启示:以社区为基础的心理教育家庭团体与更好地支持ACT模型的国家资金流相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Experiences and Service Utilization of American Indian/Alaskan Native Kinship Caregivers in Kinship Navigator Programs Across Washington State Initial Evidence for the Reliability and Validity of New Survey Measures to Evaluate Family Outcomes of Kinship and Adoption Navigator Programs Preventive Legal Services for Kinship Care: Reducing the Need for Foster Care with Family First Conceptualizations of Permanency in an Online Foster Care Community The Experiences of Asian Americans Who Intermarry in the United States: A Qualitative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1