A biomechanical evaluation of firefighters’ musculoskeletal loads when carrying self-contained breathing apparatus in walking and running

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Journal of Safety Research Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2023.08.004
Shitan Wang , Chenglong Feng , Xinpeng Chen , Mianjia Shan , Wenxin Niu
{"title":"A biomechanical evaluation of firefighters’ musculoskeletal loads when carrying self-contained breathing apparatus in walking and running","authors":"Shitan Wang ,&nbsp;Chenglong Feng ,&nbsp;Xinpeng Chen ,&nbsp;Mianjia Shan ,&nbsp;Wenxin Niu","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2023.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Introduction</em>: Musculoskeletal loading data are needed to design ergonomic intervention for firefighters. This study aimed to quantify the firefighters’ musculoskeletal loads during self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) carriage and evaluate the effectiveness of shoulder strap length variation for the prevention of SCBA-related injuries. <em>Method:</em> Twelve firefighters (height: 174.6 ± 2.4 cm, mass: 67 ± 3.5 kg, BMI = 22 ± 1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) participated the walking and running protocols with no SCBA equipped and three varying-strapped SCBAs conditions. Joint range of motion and surface electromyography (sEMG) were synchronously measured. Subsequently, joint kinematics was inputted for subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling to estimate muscle forces and joint reaction forces, while the sEMG was used to validate the model. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used for the main effects (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Independent samples <em>t</em>-test was performed to determine differences between walking and running. <em>Results:</em> Walking with SCBA increased the rectus femoris force and hip reaction force by 34.92% [<em>F</em> = 53.629; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; <em>η<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.317] and 34.71% [<em>F</em> = 53.653; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; <em>η<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.517], the growth rate was 54.2% [<em>F</em> = 76.487; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; <em>η<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.418] and 51.19% [<em>F</em> = 69.201; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; <em>η<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.652] during running, respectively. Running with SCBA significantly increased the knee reaction force by 63.04% [<em>F</em> = 83.960; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; <em>η<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.797], while only 18.49% increase during walking. Adjusting SCBA shoulder strap length significantly altered the rectus abdominis force and L4/L5 reaction force during walking and running. <em>Conclusions:</em> Results revealed that rectus femoris activity, hip and knee exertion was sensitive to SCBA carriage. The variation of shoulder strap length has potential to influence the risk of low back pain (LBP). <em>Practical applications:</em> The findings suggest that fire services promote targeting physical training at firefighters’ hip and knee regions. Test firefighters in this study were not advisable to adjust their shoulder strap at loose-fitting condition. The compatibility design of the trunk morphology and SCBA back-mounted frame was suggested for the management of LBP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"87 ","pages":"Pages 1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437523001068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Musculoskeletal loading data are needed to design ergonomic intervention for firefighters. This study aimed to quantify the firefighters’ musculoskeletal loads during self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) carriage and evaluate the effectiveness of shoulder strap length variation for the prevention of SCBA-related injuries. Method: Twelve firefighters (height: 174.6 ± 2.4 cm, mass: 67 ± 3.5 kg, BMI = 22 ± 1 kg/m2) participated the walking and running protocols with no SCBA equipped and three varying-strapped SCBAs conditions. Joint range of motion and surface electromyography (sEMG) were synchronously measured. Subsequently, joint kinematics was inputted for subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling to estimate muscle forces and joint reaction forces, while the sEMG was used to validate the model. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used for the main effects (p < 0.05). Independent samples t-test was performed to determine differences between walking and running. Results: Walking with SCBA increased the rectus femoris force and hip reaction force by 34.92% [F = 53.629; p < 0.001; η2 = 0.317] and 34.71% [F = 53.653; p < 0.001; η2 = 0.517], the growth rate was 54.2% [F = 76.487; p < 0.001; η2 = 0.418] and 51.19% [F = 69.201; p < 0.001; η2 = 0.652] during running, respectively. Running with SCBA significantly increased the knee reaction force by 63.04% [F = 83.960; p < 0.001; η2 = 0.797], while only 18.49% increase during walking. Adjusting SCBA shoulder strap length significantly altered the rectus abdominis force and L4/L5 reaction force during walking and running. Conclusions: Results revealed that rectus femoris activity, hip and knee exertion was sensitive to SCBA carriage. The variation of shoulder strap length has potential to influence the risk of low back pain (LBP). Practical applications: The findings suggest that fire services promote targeting physical training at firefighters’ hip and knee regions. Test firefighters in this study were not advisable to adjust their shoulder strap at loose-fitting condition. The compatibility design of the trunk morphology and SCBA back-mounted frame was suggested for the management of LBP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消防员在步行和跑步中携带自给式呼吸器时肌肉骨骼负荷的生物力学评估
导言:为消防员设计人体工程学干预措施需要肌肉骨骼负荷数据。本研究旨在量化消防员在携带自给式呼吸器(SCBA)时的肌肉骨骼负荷,并评估改变肩带长度对预防 SCBA 相关伤害的有效性。方法:12 名消防员(身高:174.6 ± 2.4 厘米,体重:67 ± 3.5 千克,体重指数 = 22 ± 1 千克/平方米)分别在未配备 SCBA 和三种不同肩带长度 SCBA 的情况下参加了步行和跑步训练。对关节活动范围和表面肌电图(sEMG)进行了同步测量。随后,将关节运动学数据输入特定受试者的肌肉骨骼模型,以估算肌肉力量和关节反作用力,同时使用 sEMG 验证模型。对主效应采用重复测量方差分析(p < 0.05)。对步行和跑步之间的差异进行了独立样本 t 检验。结果:使用 SCBA 步行时,股直肌力和髋部反作用力分别增加了 34.92% [F = 53.629; p < 0.001; η2 = 0.317] 和 34.71% [F = 53.653; p < 0.001; η2 = 0.517],跑步时的增长率分别为 54.2% [F = 76.487; p < 0.001; η2 = 0.418]和 51.19% [F = 69.201; p < 0.001; η2 = 0.652]。佩戴 SCBA 跑步时,膝反作用力明显增加了 63.04% [F = 83.960; p < 0.001; η2 = 0.797],而步行时仅增加了 18.49%。调整 SCBA 肩带长度可显著改变步行和跑步时的腹直肌力和 L4/L5 反作用力。结论结果表明,股直肌活动、髋关节和膝关节的用力对 SCBA 肩带长度很敏感。肩带长度的变化有可能影响腰痛(LBP)的风险。实际应用:研究结果表明,消防部门应促进针对消防员髋关节和膝关节区域的体能训练。本研究中的受试消防员不宜在宽松状态下调整肩带。建议对躯干形态和 SCBA 背装框架进行兼容性设计,以管理 LBP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
期刊最新文献
Analysis of electric bicycle riders’ visual strategies and riding performances when using a mobile phone Understanding the role of metacognitive awareness in the self-regulation of driving among older adults How have the associations between crash risks and roadway, speed, and the built environment changed after COVID-19? School zone speed compliance in the ACT, Australia: Risks, findings and recommendations for improved safety Does having a certified occupational health and safety management system lead to a greater injury rate reduction? An evaluation of the Certificate of Recognition program in Ontario, Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1