The Appalachian Just Transition and Food Access Initiatives: Two Case Studies from Central Appalachia

IF 0.6 Q3 GEOGRAPHY Southeastern Geographer Pub Date : 2022-08-27 DOI:10.1353/sgo.2022.0027
A. Higgins, E. Engle
{"title":"The Appalachian Just Transition and Food Access Initiatives: Two Case Studies from Central Appalachia","authors":"A. Higgins, E. Engle","doi":"10.1353/sgo.2022.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>highlights:</p><list list-type=\"bullet\"><list-item><label>•</label><p>Examines local food systems within context of community and economic development policy</p></list-item><list-item><label>•</label><p>Appraises two Central Appalachia food initiatives through Appalachian Just Transition framework</p></list-item><list-item><label>•</label><p>Constraints from overall context and organizational approaches lead to slippages between Transition principles and initiative outcomes.</p></list-item><list-item><label>•</label><p>Argues for and demonstrates evaluative approach for food systems-driven Transition activities</p></list-item></list><p>abstract:</p><p>Central Appalachia has a continued history of environmental, economic, and political dispossession, leading to uneven development, pollution, and specific issues around food access. A movement addressing the environmental degradation of non-renewable resources, labor issues, economic regeneration, and community health is that of the Appalachian Transition. This Transition also follows the discourse of the larger “Just Transition” movement, calling for grassroots changes towards equitable distribution of resources and power. In this paper, we use two case studies of Central Appalachian food initiatives that encompass both community-based gardening and produce prescription programs. We consider whether these local food initiatives actually realize the promise of economic, environmental, and social justice, alongside questions of the framing and alignment of the “Just” Appalachian Transition itself. This paper ends with recommendations for an evaluative approach for food systems-driven transition activities, alongside considerations around funder implications that can hinder or support organizations in realizing a “just” transition through their work.</p>","PeriodicalId":45528,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Geographer","volume":"62 1","pages":"231 - 252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeastern Geographer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sgo.2022.0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

highlights:

Examines local food systems within context of community and economic development policy

Appraises two Central Appalachia food initiatives through Appalachian Just Transition framework

Constraints from overall context and organizational approaches lead to slippages between Transition principles and initiative outcomes.

Argues for and demonstrates evaluative approach for food systems-driven Transition activities

abstract:

Central Appalachia has a continued history of environmental, economic, and political dispossession, leading to uneven development, pollution, and specific issues around food access. A movement addressing the environmental degradation of non-renewable resources, labor issues, economic regeneration, and community health is that of the Appalachian Transition. This Transition also follows the discourse of the larger “Just Transition” movement, calling for grassroots changes towards equitable distribution of resources and power. In this paper, we use two case studies of Central Appalachian food initiatives that encompass both community-based gardening and produce prescription programs. We consider whether these local food initiatives actually realize the promise of economic, environmental, and social justice, alongside questions of the framing and alignment of the “Just” Appalachian Transition itself. This paper ends with recommendations for an evaluative approach for food systems-driven transition activities, alongside considerations around funder implications that can hinder or support organizations in realizing a “just” transition through their work.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿巴拉契亚的公正过渡和粮食获取倡议:来自阿巴拉契亚中部的两个案例研究
亮点:•在社区和经济发展政策的背景下审查当地粮食系统•通过阿巴拉契亚公正过渡框架评估阿巴拉契亚中部的两项粮食倡议•来自整体背景和组织方法的限制导致过渡原则和倡议结果之间的脱节。•论证并证明了粮食系统驱动的过渡活动的评估方法摘要:阿巴拉契亚中部持续存在环境、经济和政治剥夺的历史,导致了发展不均衡、污染和粮食获取方面的具体问题。阿巴拉契亚过渡时期是一场解决不可再生资源环境退化、劳工问题、经济复兴和社区健康问题的运动。这一过渡也遵循了更大的“公正过渡”运动的言论,呼吁基层变革,实现资源和权力的公平分配。在这篇论文中,我们使用了两个阿巴拉契亚中部食品倡议的案例研究,其中包括基于社区的园艺和生产处方计划。我们考虑这些地方粮食倡议是否真的实现了经济、环境和社会正义的承诺,以及“公正”阿巴拉契亚过渡本身的框架和一致性问题。本文最后就粮食系统驱动的过渡活动的评估方法提出了建议,同时考虑了可能阻碍或支持组织通过其工作实现“公正”过渡的资助者影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Southeastern Geographer is a biannual publication of the Southeastern Division of Association of American Geographers. The journal has published the academic work of geographers and other social and physical scientists since 1961. Peer-reviewed articles and essays are published along with book reviews, organization and conference reports, and commentaries. The journal welcomes manuscripts on any geographical subject as long as it reflects sound scholarship and contains significant contributions to geographical understanding.
期刊最新文献
Latino Orlando: Suburban Transformation and Racial Conflict by Simone Delerme (review) Unraveling the Nature of Southeastern Lianas Post-Pandemic Urban Form: Tentative Signs of Office Recentralization in Charlotte Immigrants and Inequality: Evidence from a Minor-Emerging Gateway Metropolitan Area in NC Gauging Geography's Vitality through National and Regional Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1