Factors Indicating Surgical Excision in Classical Type of Lobular Neoplasia of the Breast

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breast Care Pub Date : 2021-07-07 DOI:10.1159/000516609
C. Elfgen, C. Tausch, A. Rodewald, U. Güth, C. Rageth, V. Bjelic-Radisic, M. Fleisch, C. Kurtz, J. Gonzalez Diaz, Z. Varga
{"title":"Factors Indicating Surgical Excision in Classical Type of Lobular Neoplasia of the Breast","authors":"C. Elfgen, C. Tausch, A. Rodewald, U. Güth, C. Rageth, V. Bjelic-Radisic, M. Fleisch, C. Kurtz, J. Gonzalez Diaz, Z. Varga","doi":"10.1159/000516609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Classical type of lobular neoplasia (LN) encompassing both atypical lobular hyperplasia and classical lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast is a lesion with uncertain malignant potential and has been the topic of several studies with conflicting outcome results. The aim of our study was to clarify outcome-relevant factors and treatment options of classical LN. Methods: We performed a pathological re-evaluation of the preoperative biopsy specimens and a retrospective clinical and radiological data analysis of 160 patients with LN from the Breast Center Zurich. Open surgery was performed in 65 patients, vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) in 79 patients, and surveillance after breast core needle biopsy (CNB) in 16 patients. Results: The upgrade rate into ductal carcinoma in situ/invasive cancer was the highest in case of imaging/histology discordance (40%). If the number of foci in the biopsy specimen was ≥3, the upgrade rate in the consecutive surgical specimens was increased (p = 0.01). The association of classical LN with histological microcalcification correlated with shortened disease-free survival (p < 0.01), whereas other factors showed no impact on follow-up. Conclusions: Surveillance or subsequent VAB after CNB of LN is sufficient in most cases. Careful consideration of individual radiological and histological factors is required to identify patients with a high risk of upgrade into malignancy. In those cases, surgical excision is indicated.","PeriodicalId":9310,"journal":{"name":"Breast Care","volume":"17 1","pages":"121 - 129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000516609","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000516609","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose: Classical type of lobular neoplasia (LN) encompassing both atypical lobular hyperplasia and classical lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast is a lesion with uncertain malignant potential and has been the topic of several studies with conflicting outcome results. The aim of our study was to clarify outcome-relevant factors and treatment options of classical LN. Methods: We performed a pathological re-evaluation of the preoperative biopsy specimens and a retrospective clinical and radiological data analysis of 160 patients with LN from the Breast Center Zurich. Open surgery was performed in 65 patients, vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) in 79 patients, and surveillance after breast core needle biopsy (CNB) in 16 patients. Results: The upgrade rate into ductal carcinoma in situ/invasive cancer was the highest in case of imaging/histology discordance (40%). If the number of foci in the biopsy specimen was ≥3, the upgrade rate in the consecutive surgical specimens was increased (p = 0.01). The association of classical LN with histological microcalcification correlated with shortened disease-free survival (p < 0.01), whereas other factors showed no impact on follow-up. Conclusions: Surveillance or subsequent VAB after CNB of LN is sufficient in most cases. Careful consideration of individual radiological and histological factors is required to identify patients with a high risk of upgrade into malignancy. In those cases, surgical excision is indicated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
典型乳腺小叶性肿瘤手术切除的因素分析
目的:经典小叶瘤变(LN)包括非典型小叶增生和乳腺经典小叶原位癌,是一种不确定恶性潜能的病变,已成为几项研究的主题,结果相互矛盾。我们研究的目的是阐明经典LN的结局相关因素和治疗方案。方法:我们对来自苏黎世乳腺中心的160例LN患者进行了术前活检标本的病理再评估和回顾性临床和放射学资料分析。65例患者行开放手术,79例患者行真空辅助活检(VAB), 16例患者行乳房核心穿刺活检(CNB)后监测。结果:影像学/组织学不一致时,导管原位癌/浸润性癌的升级率最高(40%)。活检标本中病灶数≥3个,连续手术标本升级率提高(p = 0.01)。经典LN与组织学微钙化的相关性与缩短无病生存期相关(p < 0.01),而其他因素对随访无影响。结论:在大多数病例中,LN CNB后的监测或后续VAB是足够的。需要仔细考虑个体放射学和组织学因素,以确定高风险升级为恶性肿瘤的患者。在这种情况下,需要手术切除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Breast Care
Breast Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Breast Care'' is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that covers all aspects of breast biology. Due to its interdisciplinary perspective, it encompasses articles on basic research, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of malignant diseases of the breast. In addition to presenting current developments in clinical research, the scope of clinical practice is broadened by including articles on relevant legal, financial and economic issues.
期刊最新文献
Retraction Statement: Paper by Sabin Goktas Aydin, Ahmet Bilici, Omer Fatih Olmez, Basak B. Oven, Ozgur Acikgoz, Tansel Cakir, Pelin Basim, Asli Cakir, Yasin Kutlu, and Jamshid Hamdard entitled "The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Predicting the Neoadjuvant Treatment Response in Patients with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer" [Breast Care. 2022;17(5):470-479. https://doi.org/10.1159/000524446]. Refining Risk Assessment for Adjuvant CDK4/6 Inhibitors beyond Trial Inclusion Criteria: Integrating Recurrence Score and Endocrine Responsiveness according to ADAPT. Erratum. Treatment Experience of Early-Stage Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer in a Real-World Setting: European Patients' Perspectives. Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version of the Breast Cancer Stigma Scale: A Methodological Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1