The Counting Approach to Multidimensional Poverty: Evidence from South Asia

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY FWU Journal of Social Sciences Pub Date : 2021-12-15 DOI:10.51709/19951272/winter-2021/4
{"title":"The Counting Approach to Multidimensional Poverty: Evidence from South Asia","authors":"","doi":"10.51709/19951272/winter-2021/4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is about the inspection of the multidimensional poverty level and changes with time. Three sample countries (Pakistan, Bangladesh, and India) are taken from the South Asian Region to measure the depth of multidimensional poverty and inequality among the deprived individuals by using Alkire and Foster (2011) “Dimension Adjusted” or headcount ratio measure, Rippin (2010) Class of Ordinal Poverty measures, and Chakravarty and D’Ambrosio (2006) Class of Poverty measures. These all three approaches are counting-based approaches that are used on ordinal variables. The data of three main dimensions (Education, Health and Standard of Living) which is further divided into ten indicators is used for this study. The secondary data is used, which is extracted from Demographic Health Surveys (DHS). The last three surveys of DHS is\nused in this study, which was conducted in different period. Results of all three countries are compared and showed that India is having more poverty followed by Bangladesh and Pakistan. Change in inequality component among deprived individuals is recorded almost similar in all three sample countries. The finding of this study shows that all three techniques are providing insightful information about the depth and component inequality among deprived individuals.","PeriodicalId":43392,"journal":{"name":"FWU Journal of Social Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FWU Journal of Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51709/19951272/winter-2021/4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is about the inspection of the multidimensional poverty level and changes with time. Three sample countries (Pakistan, Bangladesh, and India) are taken from the South Asian Region to measure the depth of multidimensional poverty and inequality among the deprived individuals by using Alkire and Foster (2011) “Dimension Adjusted” or headcount ratio measure, Rippin (2010) Class of Ordinal Poverty measures, and Chakravarty and D’Ambrosio (2006) Class of Poverty measures. These all three approaches are counting-based approaches that are used on ordinal variables. The data of three main dimensions (Education, Health and Standard of Living) which is further divided into ten indicators is used for this study. The secondary data is used, which is extracted from Demographic Health Surveys (DHS). The last three surveys of DHS is used in this study, which was conducted in different period. Results of all three countries are compared and showed that India is having more poverty followed by Bangladesh and Pakistan. Change in inequality component among deprived individuals is recorded almost similar in all three sample countries. The finding of this study shows that all three techniques are providing insightful information about the depth and component inequality among deprived individuals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多维贫困的计数方法:来自南亚的证据
本研究是关于多维贫困水平及其随时间变化的考察。本文从南亚地区选取了三个样本国家(巴基斯坦、孟加拉国和印度),通过使用Alkire和Foster(2011)的“维度调整”或人数比率衡量标准、Rippin(2010)的普通贫困衡量标准和Chakravarty和D’ambrosio(2006)的贫困衡量标准,来衡量被剥夺个人的多维贫困和不平等程度。这三种方法都是基于计数的方法,用于顺序变量。本研究使用了三个主要方面(教育、卫生和生活水平)的数据,这些数据进一步分为十个指标。使用的二手数据摘自人口健康调查(DHS)。本研究使用的是国土安全部最近三次调查,分别在不同时期进行。对这三个国家的结果进行比较后发现,印度的贫困人口更多,其次是孟加拉国和巴基斯坦。在所有三个样本国家中,被剥夺个人中不平等成分的变化几乎相似。这项研究的发现表明,所有这三种技术都提供了有关贫困个体中不平等的深度和组成部分的深刻信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
FWU Journal of Social Sciences
FWU Journal of Social Sciences SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
57.10%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Motivational Factors in Chinese Language Learning: A Study of Foreign Language Learners The Effect of Information Sources on Trust and Investment: Evidence from Economic Experimentation Situationally Appropriate Leadership Styles and Team Performance: Is Trust Really Important Nexus Between Credit Risk, Liquidity Risk, Corporate Governance and Bank Performance During Times of Crisis Unraveling the Dimensions of Child Sexual Abuse Portrayal by Web Based Media Channels: Pakistani News Framers’ Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1