Event-level contextual and motivational risk factors for cannabis use: Evidence for differing associations based on individual-level patterns of cannabis use among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals.

IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-22 DOI:10.1037/sgd0000645
Christina Dyar, Brian A Feinstein
{"title":"Event-level contextual and motivational risk factors for cannabis use: Evidence for differing associations based on individual-level patterns of cannabis use among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals.","authors":"Christina Dyar, Brian A Feinstein","doi":"10.1037/sgd0000645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Few studies have examined event-level contextual and motivational risk factors for cannabis use (CU) among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals (SMWGD). While existing studies assume the same risk factors are relevant for all individuals regardless of their pattern of CU, this study tests two theories proposing variation in associations between event-level risk factors and CU based on individual-level characteristics, including an individual's typical CU frequency (Koob & Volkow, 2010) and how often they use for different reasons and in different contexts (Creswell, 2021). We used an EMA study of CU among SMWGD to examine: 1) unmoderated event-level associations between contexts and motives for use and CU outcomes (e.g., intoxication, consequences); and 2) whether these event-level associations (e.g., daily motives predicting same-day CU outcome) varied by individual-level characteristics, including typical frequency and how often an individual uses for different reasons and in different contexts (e.g., proportion of CU days with coping motives). When an individual reported social, enhancement, or coping motives on a given occasion, they reported higher cannabis consumption. Further, using in both social and solitary settings during the same period (e.g., an evening) was associated with higher consumption than using in only social or solitary settings. Several moderators were identified. For example, coping motives more strongly predicted intoxication for individuals who tended to endorse coping motives more often. Some event-level risk factors may differentially impact CU as a function of individual-level CU patterns. Findings can help to inform the development of CU interventions for SMWGD.</p>","PeriodicalId":52125,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity","volume":" ","pages":"86-98"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11906180/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000645","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Few studies have examined event-level contextual and motivational risk factors for cannabis use (CU) among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals (SMWGD). While existing studies assume the same risk factors are relevant for all individuals regardless of their pattern of CU, this study tests two theories proposing variation in associations between event-level risk factors and CU based on individual-level characteristics, including an individual's typical CU frequency (Koob & Volkow, 2010) and how often they use for different reasons and in different contexts (Creswell, 2021). We used an EMA study of CU among SMWGD to examine: 1) unmoderated event-level associations between contexts and motives for use and CU outcomes (e.g., intoxication, consequences); and 2) whether these event-level associations (e.g., daily motives predicting same-day CU outcome) varied by individual-level characteristics, including typical frequency and how often an individual uses for different reasons and in different contexts (e.g., proportion of CU days with coping motives). When an individual reported social, enhancement, or coping motives on a given occasion, they reported higher cannabis consumption. Further, using in both social and solitary settings during the same period (e.g., an evening) was associated with higher consumption than using in only social or solitary settings. Several moderators were identified. For example, coping motives more strongly predicted intoxication for individuals who tended to endorse coping motives more often. Some event-level risk factors may differentially impact CU as a function of individual-level CU patterns. Findings can help to inform the development of CU interventions for SMWGD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大麻使用的事件层面背景和动机风险因素:基于性少数群体妇女和性别不同的个人大麻使用的个人层面模式的不同关联的证据。
很少有研究调查了性少数群体妇女和性别多样化个体(SMWGD)中大麻使用(CU)的事件水平背景和动机风险因素。虽然现有的研究假设相同的风险因素与所有个体都相关,无论他们的CU模式如何,但本研究测试了两种理论,提出了基于个体层面特征的事件层面风险因素与CU之间关联的变化,包括个体的典型CU频率(Koob & Volkow, 2010)以及他们出于不同原因和在不同背景下使用的频率(Creswell, 2021)。我们使用了SMWGD中CU的EMA研究来检查:1)使用情境和动机与CU结果(例如,中毒,后果)之间的无调节事件水平关联;2)这些事件级关联(例如,每日动机预测当天CU结果)是否因个人水平特征而变化,包括典型频率和个人出于不同原因和在不同背景下使用的频率(例如,具有应对动机的CU天数比例)。当一个人在特定场合报告社交、增强或应对动机时,他们报告的大麻消费量更高。此外,在同一时期(例如,一个晚上),在社交和独处环境中使用的人比只在社交或独处环境中使用的人消耗更多。确定了几位版主。例如,对于那些倾向于支持应对动机的人来说,应对动机更能预测醉酒。一些事件级别的风险因素作为个体级别CU模式的功能可能会对CU产生不同的影响。研究结果有助于为SMWGD的CU干预措施的发展提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity ®, the official publication of APA Division 44 (Society for the Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity), is a scholarly journal dedicated to the dissemination of information in the field of sexual orientation and gender diversity. It is a primary outlet for research particularly as it impacts practice, education, public policy, and social action. The journal is intended to be a forum for scholarly dialogue that explores the multifaceted aspects of sexual orientation and gender diversity. Its focus is on empirical research (both quantitative and qualitative), theoretical and conceptual articles, in-depth reviews of the research and literature, clinical case studies, book reviews, and letters to the editor. Many issues include a major article or set of articles on a specific theme of importance to theory, research, and/or practice in the psychology of sexual orientation and gender diversity. In addition, articles address professional issues, methodological and theoretical issues, and comments on previous publications in the journal as well as such topics that advance the psychological knowledge of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals and their families, couples and marriage, health and health care, aging, work, and careers. The journal includes all areas of psychological research, especially developmental, social, clinical, community, counseling, family, gender roles and gender nonconformity, lifespan and aging, cultural diversity including race and ethnicity, and international issues.
期刊最新文献
How masculinity and treatment impact posttraumatic stress disorder recovery in sexual minority men with sexual trauma: Findings from a randomized clinical trial. Alcohol and cannabis cessation and reduction attempts and outcomes among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals assigned female at birth. Development and Validation of the Transgender/Nonbinary Identity Support From Partners Scale. Observing Types and Successes of Alcohol Cessation Attempts Among Young Sexual and Gender Minority People Assigned Male at Birth in The RADAR Cohort Study. Mental Health Treatment Preferences of Sexual Minority Youth and Young Adults: Findings from Three Samples.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1