Like a puppet on a string … exploring Headteachers’ perceived demise of Local Governing Bodies within an English Multi-Academy Trust

IF 2.5 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Management in Education Pub Date : 2021-11-06 DOI:10.1177/08920206211051474
Caroline Vinall
{"title":"Like a puppet on a string … exploring Headteachers’ perceived demise of Local Governing Bodies within an English Multi-Academy Trust","authors":"Caroline Vinall","doi":"10.1177/08920206211051474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi-Academy Trusts (MAT) have developed organically in England since 2010. As a result, there appears to be a lack of consistency in the interpretation of delegated responsibilities of Local Governing Bodies (LGB). In a small-scale study of Headteacher (HT) accountability within one English MAT, governance was revealed as a major cause for concern. Accountability links between HT performance management, LGBs, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Trust Board were unclear. There was a perception of a lack of upward communication and an increase in local ‘rubber-stamping’ of MAT strategy. It is argued that, whilst LGBs are used as a form of ‘chain of command’ to monitor individual schools, their actual purpose may be operational; governed and limited by the Trust Board. LGBs appear to have lost their strategic influence in the conversion from maintained school to academy. I suggest that the term ‘Local Governing Body’ is potentially erroneous in its nomenclature, as some LGBs merely provide a middle level of ‘educational responsibility’ – puppets on a string.","PeriodicalId":40030,"journal":{"name":"Management in Education","volume":"36 1","pages":"25 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08920206211051474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multi-Academy Trusts (MAT) have developed organically in England since 2010. As a result, there appears to be a lack of consistency in the interpretation of delegated responsibilities of Local Governing Bodies (LGB). In a small-scale study of Headteacher (HT) accountability within one English MAT, governance was revealed as a major cause for concern. Accountability links between HT performance management, LGBs, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Trust Board were unclear. There was a perception of a lack of upward communication and an increase in local ‘rubber-stamping’ of MAT strategy. It is argued that, whilst LGBs are used as a form of ‘chain of command’ to monitor individual schools, their actual purpose may be operational; governed and limited by the Trust Board. LGBs appear to have lost their strategic influence in the conversion from maintained school to academy. I suggest that the term ‘Local Governing Body’ is potentially erroneous in its nomenclature, as some LGBs merely provide a middle level of ‘educational responsibility’ – puppets on a string.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
就像被绑在绳子上的木偶……探索在英语多学院信托中,校长对地方管理机构的认知消亡
多学院信托(MAT)自2010年以来在英国有机发展。因此,对地方管理机构授权职责的解释似乎缺乏一致性。在一项关于英语MAT中校长问责制的小规模研究中,治理被揭示为令人担忧的主要原因。HT绩效管理、LGB、首席执行官和信托委员会之间的问责联系尚不清楚。人们认为缺乏向上的沟通,MAT战略在当地的“橡皮图章”增多。有人认为,虽然LGB被用作“指挥链”的一种形式来监督各个学校,但其实际目的可能是可操作的;由信托委员会管理和限制。LGB似乎在从私立学校向学院的转变中失去了战略影响力。我认为,“地方管理机构”一词的命名可能是错误的,因为一些地方政府机构只提供了中等水平的“教育责任”——一根绳子上的木偶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Management in Education
Management in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Management in Education provides a forum for debate and discussion covering all aspects of educational management. We therefore welcome a range of articles from those dealing with day-to-day management to those related to national policy issues. Our peer review policy helps to enhance the range and quality of the articles accepted supporting those new to publication and those that are more expereienced authors. We publish research findings, opinion pieces and individual stories and our contributors come from all sectors of education.
期刊最新文献
The Odyssey of Ukrainian Universities: From quality assurance to a culture of quality education Development and validation of teachers’ psychological empowerment scale in Ethiopian context Let's decide to do better governing of schools and colleges An investigation of P-12 school administrator stress in South Dakota Digital instructional leadership in schools facing different levels of challenging contexts: A survey study during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1