Academic identity in a changing Australian higher education space: the higher education in vocational institution perspective

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Training Research Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI:10.1080/14480220.2020.1824874
Alice Sinclair, S. Webb
{"title":"Academic identity in a changing Australian higher education space: the higher education in vocational institution perspective","authors":"Alice Sinclair, S. Webb","doi":"10.1080/14480220.2020.1824874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores the academic identities of college educators of higher education in vocational institutions. Qualitative semi-structured interviews generated data from eleven educators in five vocational education institutions. Discourse analysis revealed that educators distinguished their vocational institutions’ contributions to HE as different, but equal or superior to those of universities. Educators presented their culture and practices in advantageous ways, contrasted against imagined stereotypes of university experiences, which are perceived to be deficient for supporting the types of students they teach. In adopting academic identities that distinguish their cultures and practices from those presumed prevalent in universities, these educators seek parity of esteem with universities through distinctiveness, and reject research-focused academic identities and academic drift. In embracing teacherly identities supporting students rather than the research-teaching nexus, educators may be contributing to the ‘therapeutic turn’, diminishing opportunities for students, and furthering the vertical stratification of institutions within the Australian HE space.","PeriodicalId":56351,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Training Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"121 - 140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14480220.2020.1824874","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Training Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2020.1824874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article explores the academic identities of college educators of higher education in vocational institutions. Qualitative semi-structured interviews generated data from eleven educators in five vocational education institutions. Discourse analysis revealed that educators distinguished their vocational institutions’ contributions to HE as different, but equal or superior to those of universities. Educators presented their culture and practices in advantageous ways, contrasted against imagined stereotypes of university experiences, which are perceived to be deficient for supporting the types of students they teach. In adopting academic identities that distinguish their cultures and practices from those presumed prevalent in universities, these educators seek parity of esteem with universities through distinctiveness, and reject research-focused academic identities and academic drift. In embracing teacherly identities supporting students rather than the research-teaching nexus, educators may be contributing to the ‘therapeutic turn’, diminishing opportunities for students, and furthering the vertical stratification of institutions within the Australian HE space.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
变化中的澳大利亚高等教育空间中的学术认同:职业院校视角下的高等教育
摘要本文探讨了高职院校高校教育工作者的学术身份问题。定性半结构化访谈产生了来自五所职业教育机构的11名教育工作者的数据。话语分析表明,教育工作者认为职业院校对高等教育的贡献不同于大学,但与大学的贡献相同或优于大学。教育工作者以有利的方式展示他们的文化和实践,与想象中的刻板印象形成对比,这些刻板印象被认为在支持他们所教的学生类型方面是有缺陷的。在采用将自己的文化和实践与大学中普遍存在的文化和实践区分开来的学术身份时,这些教育工作者通过独特性寻求与大学平等的尊重,并拒绝以研究为中心的学术身份和学术漂移。在接受支持学生的教师身份而不是研究与教学的联系时,教育工作者可能会促成“治疗转向”,减少学生的机会,并进一步推动澳大利亚高等教育机构的垂直分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Training Research
International Journal of Training Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Collaborative challenge-based learning: a case study for twenty-first century skills development Tertiarization and academization of vocational education and training in China and Germany The tertiary transformation imperative: issues and opportunities Challenges regarding TVET training programs in the SA automotive industry Does Australia’s competency-based training meet the mental health training needs of enrolled nurses?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1