Revolutionizing the Human Sciences: A Response to Wiebe

IF 0.5 2区哲学 0 RELIGION Method & Theory in the Study of Religion Pub Date : 2020-07-28 DOI:10.1163/15700682-12341498

Jason Ānanda Josephson Storm

引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this short response, Storm challenges the limitations of the academic manifesto as a genre, criticizes tendencies toward a naive view of science in the study of religion, and gestures instead at the need for a comprehensive revolution in the human sciences.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

革新人文科学:对韦博的回应

在这篇简短的回应中，斯托姆挑战了学术宣言作为一种体裁的局限性，批评了在宗教研究中对科学持幼稚观点的倾向，并提出了人文科学全面革命的必要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Method & Theory in the Study of Religion RELIGION-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Method & Theory in the Study of Religion publishes articles, notes, book reviews and letters which explicitly address the problems of methodology and theory in the academic study of religion. This includes such traditional points of departure as history, philosophy, anthropology and sociology, but also the natural sciences, and such newer disciplinary approaches as feminist theory and studies. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion also concentrates on the critical analysis of theoretical problems prominent in the study of religion.

期刊最新文献

Awkward History, Awkward Theory Front matter The Discursive Side of Sociological Institutionalism in the Study of Religion ‘Religious Literacy’: Some Considerations and Reservations Scholarly Values, Methods, and Evidence in the Academic Study of Religion