{"title":"Meta-analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Compared with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer","authors":"Tianjiao Wang","doi":"10.53964/jmmo.2023006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) compared with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: English databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, China Biology Medicine Disc) were searched for literature on TNT combined with total mesorectal excision (TME) compared with nCRT combined with TME for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. The literature search time limit was from the establishment of the database to October 2022. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and preliminarily evaluated the quality of the literature. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 software. Results: A total of 9 studies involving 1307 patients were included, including 668 patients in the experimental group and 639 patients in the control group. The results of the meta-analysis on survival benefits showed that the overall survival and pathological complete response rate of the experimental group were significantly better than those of the control group, with statistical significance (all, P<0.05); There was no statistical significance in the R0 resection rate and T stage downstaging rate between the two groups (all, P<0.05). The results of the meta-analysis on treatment safety showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse reactions and postoperative complications between the two groups (all, P>0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer, compared with the nCRT regimen, the TNT regimen can bring more survival benefits to patients without significantly increasing the risk of adverse reactions. It is recommended that TNT be used as a recommended treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.","PeriodicalId":73834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of modern medical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of modern medical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53964/jmmo.2023006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) compared with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: English databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, China Biology Medicine Disc) were searched for literature on TNT combined with total mesorectal excision (TME) compared with nCRT combined with TME for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. The literature search time limit was from the establishment of the database to October 2022. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and preliminarily evaluated the quality of the literature. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 software. Results: A total of 9 studies involving 1307 patients were included, including 668 patients in the experimental group and 639 patients in the control group. The results of the meta-analysis on survival benefits showed that the overall survival and pathological complete response rate of the experimental group were significantly better than those of the control group, with statistical significance (all, P<0.05); There was no statistical significance in the R0 resection rate and T stage downstaging rate between the two groups (all, P<0.05). The results of the meta-analysis on treatment safety showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse reactions and postoperative complications between the two groups (all, P>0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer, compared with the nCRT regimen, the TNT regimen can bring more survival benefits to patients without significantly increasing the risk of adverse reactions. It is recommended that TNT be used as a recommended treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
目的:系统评价全新辅助治疗(TNT)与新辅助放化疗(nCRT)治疗局部晚期癌症的疗效和安全性。方法:检索英文数据库(PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials)和中文数据库(China National Knowledge Infrastructure,Wanfang Database,China Biological Medicine Disc)中关于TNT联合全直肠炎切除术(TME)与nCRT联合TME治疗局部晚期癌症的文献。文献检索时限为自数据库建立之日起至2022年10月。两名研究人员对文献进行了独立筛选,提取了数据,并对文献质量进行了初步评估。使用Review Manager 5.4软件进行荟萃分析。结果:共纳入9项研究,涉及1307名患者,其中实验组668名患者,对照组639名患者。生存效益的meta分析结果显示,实验组的总生存率和病理完全缓解率均明显优于对照组,具有统计学意义(均为P<0.05),TNT方案可以给患者带来更多的生存益处,而不会显著增加不良反应的风险。建议TNT作为局部晚期癌症患者的推荐治疗方法。