More than tears: associations between exposure to chemical agents used by law enforcement and adverse reproductive health outcomes.

Frontiers in epidemiology Pub Date : 2023-08-23 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fepid.2023.1177874
Asha Hassan, Alison Ojanen-Goldsmith, Anna K Hing, Madeline Mahoney, Sarah Traxler, Christy M Boraas
{"title":"More than tears: associations between exposure to chemical agents used by law enforcement and adverse reproductive health outcomes.","authors":"Asha Hassan, Alison Ojanen-Goldsmith, Anna K Hing, Madeline Mahoney, Sarah Traxler, Christy M Boraas","doi":"10.3389/fepid.2023.1177874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite routine law enforcement use of chemical agents for crowd control, the reproductive health safety profiles of these products are unknown. Moreover, limited evidence has documented a link between such exposures and adverse reproductive health outcomes including abnormal uterine bleeding and potential pregnancy disruption. This cross-sectional study examined reproductive outcomes in adults with uteri exposed to chemical agents used by law enforcement, more commonly known as \"tear gas\". Participants were recruited through social media in the wake of police violence protests. Of the 1,276 participants included in analysis, 83% reported experiencing at least one of the outcomes of interest, included uterine cramping (69%), early menstrual bleeding (55%), breast tenderness (30%), and delayed menstrual bleeding (19%). Chemical agent exposure was significantly associated with higher odds of an adverse reproductive health outcome, those with 5 days or more of exposure have 2.6 times the odds (CI: 1.61, 4.22) of adverse outcomes and having a perception that one's menstruation may fluctuate according to psychosocial stressors was associated (OR = 1.94, CI: 1.36, 2.79) with a higher odds of an adverse reproductive health experience. These findings suggest a potential relationship between exposure to chemical agents and adverse reproductive health outcomes. Given the pervasive use of these chemical agents and their potential for reproductive health harm, further investigation into the safety of these products and their impacts on individual and community health is warranted urgently.</p>","PeriodicalId":73083,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1177874"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10956352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fepid.2023.1177874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite routine law enforcement use of chemical agents for crowd control, the reproductive health safety profiles of these products are unknown. Moreover, limited evidence has documented a link between such exposures and adverse reproductive health outcomes including abnormal uterine bleeding and potential pregnancy disruption. This cross-sectional study examined reproductive outcomes in adults with uteri exposed to chemical agents used by law enforcement, more commonly known as "tear gas". Participants were recruited through social media in the wake of police violence protests. Of the 1,276 participants included in analysis, 83% reported experiencing at least one of the outcomes of interest, included uterine cramping (69%), early menstrual bleeding (55%), breast tenderness (30%), and delayed menstrual bleeding (19%). Chemical agent exposure was significantly associated with higher odds of an adverse reproductive health outcome, those with 5 days or more of exposure have 2.6 times the odds (CI: 1.61, 4.22) of adverse outcomes and having a perception that one's menstruation may fluctuate according to psychosocial stressors was associated (OR = 1.94, CI: 1.36, 2.79) with a higher odds of an adverse reproductive health experience. These findings suggest a potential relationship between exposure to chemical agents and adverse reproductive health outcomes. Given the pervasive use of these chemical agents and their potential for reproductive health harm, further investigation into the safety of these products and their impacts on individual and community health is warranted urgently.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不止眼泪:接触执法部门使用的化学制剂与不良生殖健康结果之间的关系
尽管执法部门经常使用化学制剂控制人群,但这些产品的生殖健康安全状况尚不清楚。此外,有限的证据表明,这种接触与不良生殖健康结果之间存在联系,包括异常子宫出血和潜在的妊娠中断。这项横断面研究检查了暴露于执法部门使用的化学制剂(通常称为“催泪瓦斯”)的子宫的成年人的生殖结果。在警察暴力抗议之后,参与者通过社交媒体招募。在纳入分析的1276名参与者中,83%的人报告至少经历了一种感兴趣的结果,包括子宫痉挛(69%)、月经早期出血(55%)、乳房压痛(30%)和月经延迟出血(19%)。化学制剂暴露与不良生殖健康结果的几率更高显著相关,暴露5天或5天以上的人不良结果的几率是后者的2.6倍(CI:1.61,4.22),并且认为月经可能会根据心理社会压力而波动(or = 1.94,CI:1.36,2.79)与不良生殖健康经历的几率较高。这些发现表明,接触化学制剂与不良生殖健康结果之间存在潜在关系。鉴于这些化学制剂的普遍使用及其对生殖健康的潜在危害,迫切需要进一步调查这些产品的安全性及其对个人和社区健康的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of cognitive bias about infectious diseases on social well-being. The spatio-temporal evolution of leishmaniasis in the province of Essaouira. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and associated factors among adult diabetic patients: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. Using a computational cognitive model to simulate the effects of personal and social network experiences on seasonal influenza vaccination decisions. Prevalence of occupational injuries and associated factors among solid waste collectors in Jigjiga city, eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1