Symptomatic and Therapeutic Significance of Generalized Anxiety Disorder Comorbidity in Patients with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

M. Khalkhali, Bahareh Habibi, Fatemeh Eslamdoust-Siahestalkhi, H. Farrahi, R. Zare, Parnian Khalkhali
{"title":"Symptomatic and Therapeutic Significance of Generalized Anxiety Disorder Comorbidity in Patients with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder","authors":"M. Khalkhali, Bahareh Habibi, Fatemeh Eslamdoust-Siahestalkhi, H. Farrahi, R. Zare, Parnian Khalkhali","doi":"10.5812/ijpbs-131505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Psychiatric disorders frequently accompany comorbid conditions, which can have negative prognostic effects. The etiological and phenomenological distinctions between these conditions may have significant implications for their therapeutic approach and clinical course. Objectives: Our study aimed to investigate the symptomatic and therapeutic significance of comorbid generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) on obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Methods: This cross-sectional study included OCD patients referred to private and institutional psychiatric clinics in Rasht, Guilan, in 2021. All participants were divided into two groups: those with OCD and those with both OCD and GAD (OCD-GAD). The diagnoses were determined using structured clinical interviews that followed the DSM-5-research version (DSM-5-RV) criteria and included psychiatric histories. Patients were assessed using the Hamilton anxiety rating (HAM) scale, Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). The data were analyzed using SPSS version 20. Results: Out of the 146 participants, 80 had only OCD, while 66 had both OCD and GAD. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in GAF scores throughout the treatment period (P < 0.0001); however, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of these improvements. The Y-BOCS score was significantly higher in the OCD group at baseline (P < 0.0001), and it decreased more during the first 3 months in the OCD-GAD group (P = 0.006). The severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms related to symmetry (P = 0.014), hoarding (P = 0.034), taboo thoughts (P = 0.023), and aggression (P = 0.002) was significantly higher in the group with OCD. Both HAM-A and Y-BOCS scores decreased over time, but HAM-A showed a greater decline at the first follow-up, while Y-BOCS showed a greater decline at the second follow-up. Conclusions: Considering our findings, OCD-GAD diagnosis is not a unique subcategory of current psychiatric disorders, and it is not necessarily beneficial to regard it as such. However, we found that the comorbidity of GAD did not harm the prognosis of patients with OCD. Further investigations are recommended to evaluate the clinical significance of OCD-GAD comorbidity.","PeriodicalId":46644,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs-131505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Psychiatric disorders frequently accompany comorbid conditions, which can have negative prognostic effects. The etiological and phenomenological distinctions between these conditions may have significant implications for their therapeutic approach and clinical course. Objectives: Our study aimed to investigate the symptomatic and therapeutic significance of comorbid generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) on obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Methods: This cross-sectional study included OCD patients referred to private and institutional psychiatric clinics in Rasht, Guilan, in 2021. All participants were divided into two groups: those with OCD and those with both OCD and GAD (OCD-GAD). The diagnoses were determined using structured clinical interviews that followed the DSM-5-research version (DSM-5-RV) criteria and included psychiatric histories. Patients were assessed using the Hamilton anxiety rating (HAM) scale, Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). The data were analyzed using SPSS version 20. Results: Out of the 146 participants, 80 had only OCD, while 66 had both OCD and GAD. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in GAF scores throughout the treatment period (P < 0.0001); however, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of these improvements. The Y-BOCS score was significantly higher in the OCD group at baseline (P < 0.0001), and it decreased more during the first 3 months in the OCD-GAD group (P = 0.006). The severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms related to symmetry (P = 0.014), hoarding (P = 0.034), taboo thoughts (P = 0.023), and aggression (P = 0.002) was significantly higher in the group with OCD. Both HAM-A and Y-BOCS scores decreased over time, but HAM-A showed a greater decline at the first follow-up, while Y-BOCS showed a greater decline at the second follow-up. Conclusions: Considering our findings, OCD-GAD diagnosis is not a unique subcategory of current psychiatric disorders, and it is not necessarily beneficial to regard it as such. However, we found that the comorbidity of GAD did not harm the prognosis of patients with OCD. Further investigations are recommended to evaluate the clinical significance of OCD-GAD comorbidity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强迫症患者广泛性焦虑障碍共病的症状和治疗意义
背景:精神疾病经常伴有合并症,这可能对预后有负面影响。这些疾病之间的病因学和现象学差异可能对其治疗方法和临床过程具有重要意义。目的:探讨共病广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)对强迫症(OCD)的症状和治疗意义。方法:这项横断面研究包括2021年在吉兰Rasht的私人和机构精神科诊所转诊的强迫症患者。所有的参与者被分成两组:一组有强迫症,另一组同时有强迫症和广泛性焦虑症(OCD-GAD)。诊断采用结构化临床访谈,遵循dsm -5研究版(DSM-5-RV)标准,包括精神病史。采用汉密尔顿焦虑评分(HAM)量表、耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)和整体功能评估(GAF)对患者进行评估。数据采用SPSS version 20进行分析。结果:在146名参与者中,80人仅患有强迫症,66人同时患有强迫症和广泛性焦虑症。两组在整个治疗期间的GAF评分均有显著改善(P < 0.0001);然而,在这些改善方面,两组之间没有显著差异。强迫症组Y-BOCS评分在基线时显著高于对照组(P < 0.0001),而强迫症- gad组Y-BOCS评分在前3个月内下降幅度更大(P = 0.006)。强迫症组在对称(P = 0.014)、囤积(P = 0.034)、禁忌思想(P = 0.023)、攻击性(P = 0.002)方面的强迫症症状严重程度显著高于强迫症组。HAM-A和Y-BOCS评分均随时间下降,但HAM-A在第一次随访时下降更大,而Y-BOCS在第二次随访时下降更大。结论:考虑到我们的研究结果,强迫症-广泛性焦虑症的诊断并不是当前精神疾病的一个独特的子类别,而且这样认为并不一定有益。然而,我们发现广泛性焦虑症的合并症并不影响强迫症患者的预后。建议进一步调查评估强迫症-广泛性焦虑症合并症的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (IJPBS) is an international quarterly peer-reviewed journal which is aimed at promoting communication among researchers worldwide and welcomes contributions from authors in all areas of psychiatry, psychology, and behavioral sciences. The journal publishes original contributions that have not previously been submitted for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts are received with the understanding that they are submitted solely to the IJPBS. Upon submission, they become the property of the Publisher and that the data in the manuscript have been reviewed by all authors, who agree to the analysis of the data and the conclusions reached in the manuscript. The Publisher reserves copyright and renewal on all published material and such material may not be reproduced without the written permission of the Publisher. Statements in articles are the responsibility of the authors.
期刊最新文献
The Persian Version of the Perfectionistic Self-Presentation Scale: Psychometric Properties The Persian Version of the Perfectionistic Self-Presentation Scale: Psychometric Properties Self-Reported Methamphetamine Use Versus Biological Testing Among Treatment-Seeking Patients Assessment of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Risk Factors Among Law Enforcement Staff: A Case-Control Study The Efficacy and Safety of Fluoxetine Delayed-Release 90 mg/Weekly in Psychiatry: An Evidence-Based Mini-Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1