Co-creating changes to achieve decent work conditions in the New Zealand fishing industry

IF 1.5 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Global Social Policy Pub Date : 2021-07-30 DOI:10.1177/14680181211026182
Ani Kartikasari, Christina Stringer, G. Henderson
{"title":"Co-creating changes to achieve decent work conditions in the New Zealand fishing industry","authors":"Ani Kartikasari, Christina Stringer, G. Henderson","doi":"10.1177/14680181211026182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2014, New Zealand enacted the Fisheries (Foreign Charter Vessels and Other Matters) Amendment Act in response to ongoing labour abuses on board South Korean vessels in New Zealand’s foreign charter vessel sector. Importantly, the legislation expresses the universality of the International Labour Organization’s Decent Work Agenda: all member countries must pursue policies based on the strategic objectives of equality, dignity, safe working conditions and that workers are protected from exploitation. The Act was in response to the identification of widespread labour abuses in this sector. In June 2011, the extent of the abuses came to light when 32 Indonesian crewmen of the Oyang 75 walked off their vessel. In this paper, we explore how a range of stakeholders worked organically to bring about change. We do this qualitatively by combining semi-structured interview (with over 160 Indonesian migrant crewmen between 2011 and 2017), observation and document analysis. We analyse our data through the lens of participatory action research which provides a framework to document the processes of who was involved, the cycles of change, what was achieved in each cycle, and importantly the platform for change. Specifically, we look at how stakeholders – the crew themselves, their advocates, academics, non-governmental organisations, journalists, activists, among others – all played a part in achieving legislated protections.","PeriodicalId":46041,"journal":{"name":"Global Social Policy","volume":"22 1","pages":"281 - 302"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/14680181211026182","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181211026182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In 2014, New Zealand enacted the Fisheries (Foreign Charter Vessels and Other Matters) Amendment Act in response to ongoing labour abuses on board South Korean vessels in New Zealand’s foreign charter vessel sector. Importantly, the legislation expresses the universality of the International Labour Organization’s Decent Work Agenda: all member countries must pursue policies based on the strategic objectives of equality, dignity, safe working conditions and that workers are protected from exploitation. The Act was in response to the identification of widespread labour abuses in this sector. In June 2011, the extent of the abuses came to light when 32 Indonesian crewmen of the Oyang 75 walked off their vessel. In this paper, we explore how a range of stakeholders worked organically to bring about change. We do this qualitatively by combining semi-structured interview (with over 160 Indonesian migrant crewmen between 2011 and 2017), observation and document analysis. We analyse our data through the lens of participatory action research which provides a framework to document the processes of who was involved, the cycles of change, what was achieved in each cycle, and importantly the platform for change. Specifically, we look at how stakeholders – the crew themselves, their advocates, academics, non-governmental organisations, journalists, activists, among others – all played a part in achieving legislated protections.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同创造变革,在新西兰渔业实现体面的工作条件
2014年,新西兰颁布了《渔业(外国租船和其他事项)修正法》,以应对新西兰外国租船行业持续存在的韩国船只上的劳工虐待行为。重要的是,这项立法表达了国际劳工组织体面工作议程的普遍性:所有成员国必须奉行基于平等、尊严、安全工作条件和保护工人不受剥削等战略目标的政策。该法令是对该部门普遍存在的滥用劳工现象的查明作出的反应。2011年6月,当“欧阳75号”上的32名印尼船员离开他们的船只时,虐待的程度被曝光。在本文中,我们探讨了一系列利益相关者如何有机地合作以实现变革。我们通过结合半结构化访谈(2011年至2017年期间对160多名印度尼西亚移民船员进行了访谈)、观察和文件分析来进行定性研究。我们通过参与性行动研究的视角来分析我们的数据,参与性行动研究提供了一个框架来记录参与人员的过程、变化的周期、每个周期取得的成果,以及重要的变化平台。具体来说,我们考察了利益相关者——船员本身、他们的倡导者、学者、非政府组织、记者、活动家等——如何在实现立法保护方面发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Social Policy
Global Social Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Global Social Policy is a fully peer-reviewed journal that advances the understanding of the impact of globalisation processes upon social policy and social development on the one hand, and the impact of social policy upon globalisation processes on the other hand. The journal analyses the contributions of a range of national and international actors, both governmental and non-governmental, to global social policy and social development discourse and practice. Global Social Policy publishes scholarly policy-oriented articles and reports that focus on aspects of social policy and social and human development as broadly defined in the context of globalisation be it in contemporary or historical contexts.
期刊最新文献
Social sustainability in the decarbonized welfare state: Social policy as a buffer against poverty related to environmental taxes When growth is not enough: Do government transfers moderate the effect of economic growth on absolute and relative child poverty? Social policy as knowledge process: How its sociotechnical links to labour reconfigure the social question An eco-social policy typology: From system reproduction to transformation Reflexivity in global social policy: Introduction to the special issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1