Mapping the Spatial Conditions of Polycentric Urban Development in Europe: An Open-source Software Tool

IF 3.3 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geographical Analysis Pub Date : 2021-11-09 DOI:10.1111/gean.12313
Freke Caset, Ben Derudder, Céline Van Migerode, Bart De Wit
{"title":"Mapping the Spatial Conditions of Polycentric Urban Development in Europe: An Open-source Software Tool","authors":"Freke Caset,&nbsp;Ben Derudder,&nbsp;Céline Van Migerode,&nbsp;Bart De Wit","doi":"10.1111/gean.12313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Urban polycentricity has become a key concept in urban and regional studies and is increasingly adopted as an organizational framework for conducting empirical research. Within this literature, polycentric urban regions are commonly defined as territories that have multiple, proximately located (sub)centers and are characterized by balanced urban development. However, analytical-operational frameworks to identify and classify PURs are often ad hoc efforts to answer a specific research question and underlying work is often shelved rather than shared and/or made accessible. As a result, challenges associated with generalizability, reproducibility, and replicability clearly loom large in the urban polycentricity literature. Against this backdrop, this article describes the discrepancy between a rich debate on polycentricity and the paucity of tools enabling the disambiguation and reproducibility of results claimed by various authors around this polysemic concept. We present an online and open tool—PURban—that brings together the major analytical-operational frameworks and data sets in urban polycentricity research and allows parametrizing key operational choices. To illustrate the tool, we demonstrate how it facilitates the identification, mapping and analysis of degrees of morphological polycentricity in European urban systems. We conclude by reflecting on how this tool can act as a catalyst for future research on urban polycentricity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12533,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Analysis","volume":"54 3","pages":"583-598"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gean.12313","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Urban polycentricity has become a key concept in urban and regional studies and is increasingly adopted as an organizational framework for conducting empirical research. Within this literature, polycentric urban regions are commonly defined as territories that have multiple, proximately located (sub)centers and are characterized by balanced urban development. However, analytical-operational frameworks to identify and classify PURs are often ad hoc efforts to answer a specific research question and underlying work is often shelved rather than shared and/or made accessible. As a result, challenges associated with generalizability, reproducibility, and replicability clearly loom large in the urban polycentricity literature. Against this backdrop, this article describes the discrepancy between a rich debate on polycentricity and the paucity of tools enabling the disambiguation and reproducibility of results claimed by various authors around this polysemic concept. We present an online and open tool—PURban—that brings together the major analytical-operational frameworks and data sets in urban polycentricity research and allows parametrizing key operational choices. To illustrate the tool, we demonstrate how it facilitates the identification, mapping and analysis of degrees of morphological polycentricity in European urban systems. We conclude by reflecting on how this tool can act as a catalyst for future research on urban polycentricity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制欧洲多中心城市发展的空间条件:一个开源软件工具
城市多中心性已成为城市和区域研究中的一个关键概念,并越来越多地被用作开展实证研究的组织框架。在本文献中,多中心城市区域通常被定义为具有多个近距离(次)中心的区域,其特征是城市发展平衡。然而,用于识别和分类PURs的分析-操作框架通常是为了回答特定的研究问题而做出的特别努力,并且基础工作通常被搁置,而不是共享和/或使其可访问。因此,在城市多中心的文献中,与普遍性、可重复性和可复制性相关的挑战明显地显得很突出。在此背景下,本文描述了关于多中心性的丰富辩论与缺乏工具之间的差异,这些工具能够消除歧义并再现各种作者围绕这一多义概念所声称的结果。我们提出了一个在线和开放的工具——purban,它汇集了城市多中心研究中的主要分析操作框架和数据集,并允许对关键操作选择进行参数化。为了说明这个工具,我们展示了它如何促进欧洲城市系统中形态多中心性程度的识别、映射和分析。最后,我们反思了这一工具如何成为未来城市多中心研究的催化剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: First in its specialty area and one of the most frequently cited publications in geography, Geographical Analysis has, since 1969, presented significant advances in geographical theory, model building, and quantitative methods to geographers and scholars in a wide spectrum of related fields. Traditionally, mathematical and nonmathematical articulations of geographical theory, and statements and discussions of the analytic paradigm are published in the journal. Spatial data analyses and spatial econometrics and statistics are strongly represented.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Impacts of improved transport on regional market access Testing Hypotheses When You Have More Than a Few* Beyond Auto‐Models: Self‐Correlated Sui‐Model Respecifications Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1