[Social support perceived by pregnant women in Santa Marta, Colombia: A comparative analysisApoio social percebido por gestantes de Santa Marta, Colombia: uma análise comparativa].

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING Revista Cuidarte Pub Date : 2023-03-29 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI:10.15649/cuidarte.2448
Whitne Dayana Thomas-Hilarión, Laura Vanessa Fuentes-Vanegas, Yeison David Gallo-Barrera, Ediltrudis Ramos De la Cruz
{"title":"[Social support perceived by pregnant women in Santa Marta, Colombia: A comparative analysisApoio social percebido por gestantes de Santa Marta, Colombia: uma análise comparativa].","authors":"Whitne Dayana Thomas-Hilarión, Laura Vanessa Fuentes-Vanegas, Yeison David Gallo-Barrera, Ediltrudis Ramos De la Cruz","doi":"10.15649/cuidarte.2448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Perceived social support during gestation is important for perinatal mental health. However, little is known about these variables in the Colombian population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare perceived social support with sociodemographic and gynaeco-obstetric variables and positive affect in pregnant women in Santa Marta, Colombia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty women between 19 and 41 years of age (M=26.48; SD=5.03), in their third trimester of pregnancy and beneficiaries of a program to promote exclusive breastfeeding, participated. The participants filled out a sociodemographic and gynaeco-obstetric form, the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) (a=0.88), and a subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) (a=0.82). The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparative statistical analyses. Ethical guidelines for human research were followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>67% of the participants belonged to a low socioeconomic status, 87.5% had a partner, 67.5% had a higher education, 42.5% were employed, and 47.5% were new mothers. Women of higher socioeconomic status perceived greater social support from their friends (p = 0.01). Family social support was significantly higher in first-time mothers (p=0.01) and mothers who reported higher positive affect (p = 0.03). Finally, social support from significant others was higher when it was the woman's first pregnancy (p=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant differences were found in some dimensions of perceived social support according to socioeconomic status, being a first-time mother, and positive affect. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":43234,"journal":{"name":"Revista Cuidarte","volume":" ","pages":"e2448"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Cuidarte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.2448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Perceived social support during gestation is important for perinatal mental health. However, little is known about these variables in the Colombian population.

Objective: To compare perceived social support with sociodemographic and gynaeco-obstetric variables and positive affect in pregnant women in Santa Marta, Colombia.

Materials and methods: Forty women between 19 and 41 years of age (M=26.48; SD=5.03), in their third trimester of pregnancy and beneficiaries of a program to promote exclusive breastfeeding, participated. The participants filled out a sociodemographic and gynaeco-obstetric form, the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) (a=0.88), and a subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) (a=0.82). The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparative statistical analyses. Ethical guidelines for human research were followed.

Results: 67% of the participants belonged to a low socioeconomic status, 87.5% had a partner, 67.5% had a higher education, 42.5% were employed, and 47.5% were new mothers. Women of higher socioeconomic status perceived greater social support from their friends (p = 0.01). Family social support was significantly higher in first-time mothers (p=0.01) and mothers who reported higher positive affect (p = 0.03). Finally, social support from significant others was higher when it was the woman's first pregnancy (p=0.02).

Conclusions: Significant differences were found in some dimensions of perceived social support according to socioeconomic status, being a first-time mother, and positive affect. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哥伦比亚圣玛尔塔孕妇的社会支持感知:比较分析
导言:怀孕期间感知到的社会支持对围产期心理健康很重要。然而,哥伦比亚人口对这些变量知之甚少。目的:比较哥伦比亚圣玛尔塔孕妇根据社会人口学、性别平衡和积极情感变量感知的社会支持。材料和方法:40名19至41岁的妇女(M=26.48;DE=5.03)参加了一项促进纯母乳喂养的方案,她们正在怀孕的第三个季度。参与者编制了一份社会人口学和性别平衡信息表、多维感知社会支持量表(α=0.88)和积极和消极情感量表(α=0.82)的子量表。Mann-Whitney U检验用于比较统计分析,并遵循了人类研究的伦理准则。结果:67%的参与者社会经济地位较低,87.5%有伴侣,67.5%受过高等教育,42.5%有工作,47.5%是初生母亲。社会经济地位高的女性从朋友那里获得了更多的社会支持(P=0.01)。家庭社会支持在初生母亲中显著较高(P=0.01),在那些报告了更多积极情感的母亲中(P=0.03)。最后,显着个体在女性第一次怀孕时的社会支持较高(P=0.02)。结论:根据社会经济阶层、初生母亲和积极情感,感知到的社会支持的某些维度存在显著差异。建议进行更大样本量的其他研究。引用这篇文章:托马斯-希拉里翁·惠特·达亚纳,富恩特斯-瓦内加斯·劳拉·瓦内萨,加洛-巴雷拉·耶森·大卫,拉莫斯-德拉克鲁兹·埃迪尔特鲁迪斯。哥伦比亚圣玛尔塔孕妇感知的社会支持:比较分析。杂志照顾你。2022年;13(3):E2448。http://dx.doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.2448
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Cuidarte
Revista Cuidarte NURSING-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Risk factors for suicidal ideation in university students. Monitoring smart infusion pumps in adult intensive care units. Effectiveness of flower therapy in reducing anxiety in older adults. Association between social disadvantage and falls in older adults: a longitudinal study. Validation of an educational material to promote spiritual well-being in oncology patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1