Export concentration and diversification impact on economic growth in the developed and developing countries of the world

IF 0.6 Q2 Social Sciences Economic Annals-XXI Pub Date : 2021-09-21 DOI:10.21003/ea.v192-03
V. Dergachova, A. Dunska, V. Holiuk, I. Lutsenko, Maryna Pichugina
{"title":"Export concentration and diversification impact on economic growth in the developed and developing countries of the world","authors":"V. Dergachova, A. Dunska, V. Holiuk, I. Lutsenko, Maryna Pichugina","doi":"10.21003/ea.v192-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is much evidence that export diversity has a positive effect on economic growth, but there is some evidence that the concentration of exports may be also related to economic growth. The paper is dedicated to the relationship between export diversification and economic growth in developed and developing countries for 25 years (1996-2020) and 10 years (2011-2020). Correlation between concentration index (Herfindahl-Hirschmann Index), diversification index (modified Finger-Kreinin measure of similarity in trade) and economic growth was studied to confirm or deny the statements concerning positive or negative influence of export diversification and concentration on economic growth. The results of the study show that concentration index is lower in developed countries and does not varies much over time. While developing countries show higher magnitudes of this index and higher volatility level of this index and its relationship to the world business cycles. Level of export diversification is higher in developed countries, which show more similar export structure to the world pattern comparing with other national economies. Diversification index dynamics in developed and developing countries was getting closer to each other in 2012-2020 and now they are almost the same, though export diversification level of developed countries is a bit closer to the world export pattern comparing to the developing countries index. The findings show that in developing countries export concentration index has sufficient correlation with their GDP growth rates in both periods. That means the more key goods they sell the higher GDP growth rate they get. There is no long-time influence on economic development of these states according to this lagged correlation study of 1996-2020 period. Study based on 10-year period show sufficient 1-year lagged correlation rate, but the hypothesis concerning lagged positive impact of export concentration of economic development of these countries during the last decade needs proof. Developed countries have weak or moderate correlation between export concentration and GDP growth. Hence, developing countries mostly concentrate their export on a few primary goods but there is a need of additional research to find out if they use this money to develop other industries. Eventually there are different economies in these groups and some of them have different exports patterns and development models. Correlation analysis of the relationship between diversification index and GDP growth in 25-year period has shown weak or rather moderate association that does not give us possibility to make an assumption concerning the sufficient impact of export diversification on economic growth. However, in 10-year study we observe high correlation between these data in developing countries, especially in 5-year lag study. If in case of developing countries we observe positive relationship, analysis of developed countries indices shows negative relationship that confirms the statement about role of export diversification in economic growth of developed counties and export concentration - in developing economies. The more their export pattern deviates from the global structure (which is rather diversified) the higher their growth level is. Therefore, their export consists mostly of a few products. Negative relationship between diversification index and GDP growth in developed countries confirms the well-known statement that export diversification should promote economic growth. Lag dynamics in these cases needs additional studies. The list of issues of the following research also includes the search for a model of the nonlinear relationship between export diversification indices and growth rates in economies of different levels of development. The study has been also focused on the transition economies group, which has shown results more similar to those of developing countries comparing with developed economies. Export concentration index of transition economies is higher than in developing countries and more volatile; export diversification index is much bigger comparing with developing and developed economies. We state that these results reflect existing primary product export strategy of transition economies. The highest concentration and diversification indices are observed in countries that export energy resources. As a result of the study, the statement that the diversity of exports has a positive effect on economic growth was confirmed. The study has revealed that in developed countries economic growth usually are associated with diversified export basket. The study also showed that over the past 25 years, a developing economy to provide growth did not necessarily need diversified export. Number of countries have shown consistent economic growth driven by export of primary products.","PeriodicalId":51923,"journal":{"name":"Economic Annals-XXI","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Annals-XXI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.v192-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

There is much evidence that export diversity has a positive effect on economic growth, but there is some evidence that the concentration of exports may be also related to economic growth. The paper is dedicated to the relationship between export diversification and economic growth in developed and developing countries for 25 years (1996-2020) and 10 years (2011-2020). Correlation between concentration index (Herfindahl-Hirschmann Index), diversification index (modified Finger-Kreinin measure of similarity in trade) and economic growth was studied to confirm or deny the statements concerning positive or negative influence of export diversification and concentration on economic growth. The results of the study show that concentration index is lower in developed countries and does not varies much over time. While developing countries show higher magnitudes of this index and higher volatility level of this index and its relationship to the world business cycles. Level of export diversification is higher in developed countries, which show more similar export structure to the world pattern comparing with other national economies. Diversification index dynamics in developed and developing countries was getting closer to each other in 2012-2020 and now they are almost the same, though export diversification level of developed countries is a bit closer to the world export pattern comparing to the developing countries index. The findings show that in developing countries export concentration index has sufficient correlation with their GDP growth rates in both periods. That means the more key goods they sell the higher GDP growth rate they get. There is no long-time influence on economic development of these states according to this lagged correlation study of 1996-2020 period. Study based on 10-year period show sufficient 1-year lagged correlation rate, but the hypothesis concerning lagged positive impact of export concentration of economic development of these countries during the last decade needs proof. Developed countries have weak or moderate correlation between export concentration and GDP growth. Hence, developing countries mostly concentrate their export on a few primary goods but there is a need of additional research to find out if they use this money to develop other industries. Eventually there are different economies in these groups and some of them have different exports patterns and development models. Correlation analysis of the relationship between diversification index and GDP growth in 25-year period has shown weak or rather moderate association that does not give us possibility to make an assumption concerning the sufficient impact of export diversification on economic growth. However, in 10-year study we observe high correlation between these data in developing countries, especially in 5-year lag study. If in case of developing countries we observe positive relationship, analysis of developed countries indices shows negative relationship that confirms the statement about role of export diversification in economic growth of developed counties and export concentration - in developing economies. The more their export pattern deviates from the global structure (which is rather diversified) the higher their growth level is. Therefore, their export consists mostly of a few products. Negative relationship between diversification index and GDP growth in developed countries confirms the well-known statement that export diversification should promote economic growth. Lag dynamics in these cases needs additional studies. The list of issues of the following research also includes the search for a model of the nonlinear relationship between export diversification indices and growth rates in economies of different levels of development. The study has been also focused on the transition economies group, which has shown results more similar to those of developing countries comparing with developed economies. Export concentration index of transition economies is higher than in developing countries and more volatile; export diversification index is much bigger comparing with developing and developed economies. We state that these results reflect existing primary product export strategy of transition economies. The highest concentration and diversification indices are observed in countries that export energy resources. As a result of the study, the statement that the diversity of exports has a positive effect on economic growth was confirmed. The study has revealed that in developed countries economic growth usually are associated with diversified export basket. The study also showed that over the past 25 years, a developing economy to provide growth did not necessarily need diversified export. Number of countries have shown consistent economic growth driven by export of primary products.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
出口集中和多样化对世界发达国家和发展中国家的经济增长都有影响
大量证据表明,出口多样性对经济增长有积极影响,但也有一些证据表明,出口集中度也可能与经济增长有关。本文研究了25年(1996-2020)和10年(2011-2020)的发达国家和发展中国家出口多样化与经济增长的关系。本文研究了集中度指数(Herfindahl-Hirschmann指数)、多样化指数(修正的Finger-Kreinin贸易相似性测度)与经济增长的相关性,以证实或否定出口多样化和集中度对经济增长的积极或消极影响。研究结果表明,发达国家的浓度指数较低,且随时间变化不大。而发展中国家则表现出较高的指数幅度和较高的波动性及其与世界商业周期的关系。发达国家出口多样化程度较高,出口结构与世界格局的趋同程度高于其他国家。2012-2020年,发达国家和发展中国家出口多样化指数动态趋近,但发达国家出口多样化水平比发展中国家出口多样化指数更接近世界出口格局。研究结果表明,在发展中国家,出口集中度指数与两个时期的国内生产总值增长率有充分的相关性。这意味着他们销售的关键商品越多,他们的GDP增长率就越高。根据1996-2020年的滞后相关性研究,这些州的经济发展不存在长期影响。以10年为周期的研究显示出足够的1年滞后相关率,但关于出口集中度对这些国家近10年经济发展的滞后正向影响的假设有待证实。发达国家出口集中度与GDP增长的相关性较弱或中等。因此,发展中国家的出口主要集中在少数初级产品上,但需要进一步研究,以查明它们是否利用这些钱发展其他行业。最终,这些集团中有不同的经济体,其中一些有不同的出口模式和发展模式。对出口多样化指数与国内生产总值(GDP)增长25年的相关性分析表明,出口多样化指数与GDP增长之间的相关性较弱或较为温和,这使得我们无法对出口多样化对经济增长的充分影响做出假设。然而,在10年的研究中,我们观察到这些数据在发展中国家之间具有很高的相关性,特别是在5年的滞后研究中。如果在发展中国家的情况下,我们观察到正相关,发达国家指数的分析显示负相关,这证实了关于出口多样化在发达国家经济增长中的作用和发展中经济体出口集中度的说法。出口模式越偏离全球结构(相当多样化),其增长水平越高。因此,他们的出口主要由几种产品组成。发达国家多样化指数与GDP增长呈负相关关系,证实了出口多样化应促进经济增长的著名论断。这些情况下的滞后动力学需要进一步的研究。以下研究的问题清单还包括在不同发展水平的经济体中寻找出口多样化指数与增长率之间非线性关系的模型。这项研究也集中于转型期经济组,其结果与发达经济体相比,与发展中国家更为相似。转型经济体的出口集中指数比发展中国家高,也更不稳定;与发展中国家和发达国家相比,出口多样化指数要大得多。我们认为,这些结果反映了转型经济体现有的初级产品出口战略。能源出口国家的集中和多样化指数最高。研究结果证实了出口多样化对经济增长有积极作用的说法。研究表明,在发达国家,经济增长通常与多样化的出口篮子有关。该研究还表明,在过去的25年里,发展中经济体提供增长并不一定需要多样化的出口。一些国家在初级产品出口的推动下经济持续增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Annals-XXI
Economic Annals-XXI ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Economic Annals-XXI Journal – recognized in Ukraine and abroad scientific-analytic edition. Scientific articles of leading Ukrainian and other foreign scientists, postgraduate students and doctorates, deputies of Ukraine, heads of state and local authorities, materials of scientific conferences and seminars; reviews on scientific monographs, etc. are regularly published in this Journal.
期刊最新文献
Economic aspects of obtaining a functional creamy vegetable spread with a balanced fatty acid composition System characteristics and matrix tools for evaluating innovative business models of youth tourism Empirical study of business intelligence systems and their influence on innovation performance Phenomenology of the scientific system of Kazakhstan: a study of social and economic effects through the Hofstede’s five-dimensional model of cultural space and beyond Economic viability and market potential of combined intermediate moisture dairy products production in Kazakhstan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1