Retrogressive Mobilization in the 2018 “Referendum for Family” in Romania

IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Problems of Post-Communism Pub Date : 2021-10-13 DOI:10.1080/10758216.2021.1987270
Ov Cristian Norocel, Ionela Băluță
{"title":"Retrogressive Mobilization in the 2018 “Referendum for Family” in Romania","authors":"Ov Cristian Norocel, Ionela Băluță","doi":"10.1080/10758216.2021.1987270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We approach critically the assertion that a referendum ultimately defends the “traditional family,” by examining the articulation of anti-gender politics in Romanian parliamentary debates. We contribute theoretically by employing the concept of retrogressive mobilization in plebiscitary circumstances. We show that in Romania the contours of retrogressive mobilization transgress both the ideological left–right cleavage, and even party loyalty. We demonstrate how the ideological work done for the fantasmatic logics of retrogressive mobilization articulates two antithetical narrative scenarios, both centering on the Orthodox “nature” of the Romanian nation, whose existence and survival are said to hinge on the protection of the “traditional family” from “LGBT ideology.”","PeriodicalId":46824,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Post-Communism","volume":"70 1","pages":"153 - 162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Post-Communism","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2021.1987270","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

ABSTRACT We approach critically the assertion that a referendum ultimately defends the “traditional family,” by examining the articulation of anti-gender politics in Romanian parliamentary debates. We contribute theoretically by employing the concept of retrogressive mobilization in plebiscitary circumstances. We show that in Romania the contours of retrogressive mobilization transgress both the ideological left–right cleavage, and even party loyalty. We demonstrate how the ideological work done for the fantasmatic logics of retrogressive mobilization articulates two antithetical narrative scenarios, both centering on the Orthodox “nature” of the Romanian nation, whose existence and survival are said to hinge on the protection of the “traditional family” from “LGBT ideology.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2018年罗马尼亚“家庭全民投票”的逆向动员
摘要我们通过考察罗马尼亚议会辩论中反性别政治的表达,批判性地看待公投最终捍卫“传统家庭”的说法。我们通过在公民投票情况下采用倒退动员的概念,在理论上作出了贡献。我们表明,在罗马尼亚,倒退动员的轮廓既违背了意识形态上的左右分裂,也违背了政党忠诚。我们展示了为倒退动员的幻想逻辑所做的意识形态工作是如何表达两种对立的叙事场景的,这两种叙事场景都围绕着罗马尼亚民族的正统“本质”,据说罗马尼亚民族的存在和生存取决于保护“传统家庭”免受“LGBT意识形态”的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Problems of Post-Communism
Problems of Post-Communism POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The post-communist countries are the most rapidly changing societies of Europe and Asia. For insight into this twenty-first century revolution, there is no better source than Problems of Post-Communism. Emphasis is placed on timely research covering current economic, political, security, and international developments and trends in Russia and China, Central Europe and Central Asia, Latin America, and Southeast Asia. Clarity and readability make the articles fully accessible to researchers, policy makers, and students alike.
期刊最新文献
From the Chicago Boys to Hjalmar Schacht: The Trajectory of the (Neo)liberal Economic Expertise in Russia War and the Willingness to Resist and Fight in Ukraine I’m Angry! Disability Protests in Post-Communist Poland Russia’s Authoritarian Policymaking: The Politics of Domestic Violence after Partial Decriminalization Securitization of Immigration in the Czech Republic and Its Impact on the Czech Migration Policy: Experts’ Perceptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1