Confederate Monuments and their Impact on the Collective Memory of the South and the North

IF 0.6 Q3 GEOGRAPHY Southeastern Geographer Pub Date : 2021-08-05 DOI:10.1353/sgo.2021.0018
Genevieve Klein
{"title":"Confederate Monuments and their Impact on the Collective Memory of the South and the North","authors":"Genevieve Klein","doi":"10.1353/sgo.2021.0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:The end of the United States' Civil War saw the creation of a Confederate-created mythology. This mythology, referred to as the \"Lost Cause,\" detailed the antebellum period of the South and the South's role in the war which was contrary to the actual events. For example, the Lost Cause maintained that the war was fought over states' rights instead of slavery and that slavery was a beneficial environment for the enslaved. Viewing the Lost Cause through the lens of a (Confederate) Southern collective memory, this literature review examines how monuments have buttressed the Lost Cause for more than a century. Building on this examination, the review suggests that monuments were a factor in the virus-like transmission of the Lost Cause to the former Union states. While there are few Confederate monuments in the North, they may be found in Southern tourist areas visited by Northerners. For example, the battlefields of large Civil War engagements are now national parks. This means millions of Northerners are exposed to Confederate monuments, and the exposure occurs in areas understood to be historical. In other words, Northerners take back a mythological and Confederate view of their country.","PeriodicalId":45528,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Geographer","volume":"61 1","pages":"241 - 257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeastern Geographer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sgo.2021.0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:The end of the United States' Civil War saw the creation of a Confederate-created mythology. This mythology, referred to as the "Lost Cause," detailed the antebellum period of the South and the South's role in the war which was contrary to the actual events. For example, the Lost Cause maintained that the war was fought over states' rights instead of slavery and that slavery was a beneficial environment for the enslaved. Viewing the Lost Cause through the lens of a (Confederate) Southern collective memory, this literature review examines how monuments have buttressed the Lost Cause for more than a century. Building on this examination, the review suggests that monuments were a factor in the virus-like transmission of the Lost Cause to the former Union states. While there are few Confederate monuments in the North, they may be found in Southern tourist areas visited by Northerners. For example, the battlefields of large Civil War engagements are now national parks. This means millions of Northerners are exposed to Confederate monuments, and the exposure occurs in areas understood to be historical. In other words, Northerners take back a mythological and Confederate view of their country.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
邦联纪念碑及其对南方和北方集体记忆的影响
美国内战结束后,邦联创造了一个神话。这个神话,被称为“失败的事业”,详细描述了南方在内战前的时期和南方在战争中的作用,这与实际事件相反。例如,失败的原因坚持认为,战争是为州的权利而不是奴隶制而战,奴隶制对被奴役的人来说是一个有益的环境。通过南方(邦联)集体记忆的镜头来观察失败的事业,这篇文献综述研究了一个多世纪以来纪念碑是如何支撑失败的事业的。在此审查的基础上,审查表明,纪念碑是失败的原因像病毒一样传播到前联邦各州的一个因素。虽然北方很少有邦联纪念碑,但在北方人参观的南部旅游区可能会发现它们。例如,南北战争的大战场现在是国家公园。这意味着数以百万计的北方人暴露在邦联纪念碑面前,而这种暴露发生在被认为具有历史意义的地区。换句话说,北方人收回了对他们国家的神话和邦联的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Southeastern Geographer is a biannual publication of the Southeastern Division of Association of American Geographers. The journal has published the academic work of geographers and other social and physical scientists since 1961. Peer-reviewed articles and essays are published along with book reviews, organization and conference reports, and commentaries. The journal welcomes manuscripts on any geographical subject as long as it reflects sound scholarship and contains significant contributions to geographical understanding.
期刊最新文献
Latino Orlando: Suburban Transformation and Racial Conflict by Simone Delerme (review) Unraveling the Nature of Southeastern Lianas Post-Pandemic Urban Form: Tentative Signs of Office Recentralization in Charlotte Immigrants and Inequality: Evidence from a Minor-Emerging Gateway Metropolitan Area in NC Gauging Geography's Vitality through National and Regional Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1