Impact of a specialty pharmacy benefit on rheumatoid arthritis medication adherence and functional status: a continuation study

Miranda Kozlicki, M. Zande, Marleen Wickizer, R. Topp, Sharon Faust, C. Hustad
{"title":"Impact of a specialty pharmacy benefit on rheumatoid arthritis medication adherence and functional status: a continuation study","authors":"Miranda Kozlicki, M. Zande, Marleen Wickizer, R. Topp, Sharon Faust, C. Hustad","doi":"10.1080/21556660.2019.1658305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have benefited from the introduction of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors; however, multiple studies have reported that rates of medication adherence are sub-optimal. Specialty pharmacies offer various management strategies to improve adherence in patients with RA to help improve disease status. Aims: To expand the initial analysis results by gathering adherence data between 6 and 12 months and HAQ-II scores at 12 months after transitioning members to the specialty pharmacy to determine the impact of a specialty pharmacy benefit on RA medication adherence and functional status. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using an internal pharmacoadherence application. Members with claims for TNF-inhibitors were included, provided they received at least two fills within the study time periods of May 1, 2017–December 31, 2017 (pre-transition), January 1, 2018–August 31, 2018 (post-transition), and September 1, 2018–April 30, 2019 (extension). Pharmacy claims were analyzed to measure adherence by calculating the proportion of days covered (PDC) in each time period. Members with a baseline HAQ-II score after transition were compared to 6-month post-transition and 12-month extension HAQ-II scores for a correlation to adherence. Results: A total of 101 members with RA were included. Prior to transition, 34% of members were filling at non-specialty pharmacies and 66% of members were filling at specialty pharmacies. PDC values for baseline, post-transition, and extension time periods were 0.848, 0.907, and 0.819, respectively, for members filling at non-specialty pharmacies prior to transition and 0.904, 0.889, and 0.818, respectively, for members filling at a specialty pharmacy prior to transition. The percentage of patients achieving a desired adherence level (PDC>0.8) increased post-transition for members previously filling at non-specialty pharmacies (65.2% vs 84.8%). A statistically significant inverse relationship was found between baseline HAQ-II score and pre-transition PDC value (r = –0.200, p = .035) for 112 members with completed functional assessments. Conclusions: PDC is significantly correlated to HAQ-II scores at baseline, and adherence is also shown to increase for members transitioning from a non-specialty to specialty pharmacy. More analysis is needed to determine if the HAQ-II is an appropriate functionality questionnaire to assess RA disease status.","PeriodicalId":15631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drug Assessment","volume":"8 1","pages":"27 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21556660.2019.1658305","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drug Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2019.1658305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have benefited from the introduction of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors; however, multiple studies have reported that rates of medication adherence are sub-optimal. Specialty pharmacies offer various management strategies to improve adherence in patients with RA to help improve disease status. Aims: To expand the initial analysis results by gathering adherence data between 6 and 12 months and HAQ-II scores at 12 months after transitioning members to the specialty pharmacy to determine the impact of a specialty pharmacy benefit on RA medication adherence and functional status. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using an internal pharmacoadherence application. Members with claims for TNF-inhibitors were included, provided they received at least two fills within the study time periods of May 1, 2017–December 31, 2017 (pre-transition), January 1, 2018–August 31, 2018 (post-transition), and September 1, 2018–April 30, 2019 (extension). Pharmacy claims were analyzed to measure adherence by calculating the proportion of days covered (PDC) in each time period. Members with a baseline HAQ-II score after transition were compared to 6-month post-transition and 12-month extension HAQ-II scores for a correlation to adherence. Results: A total of 101 members with RA were included. Prior to transition, 34% of members were filling at non-specialty pharmacies and 66% of members were filling at specialty pharmacies. PDC values for baseline, post-transition, and extension time periods were 0.848, 0.907, and 0.819, respectively, for members filling at non-specialty pharmacies prior to transition and 0.904, 0.889, and 0.818, respectively, for members filling at a specialty pharmacy prior to transition. The percentage of patients achieving a desired adherence level (PDC>0.8) increased post-transition for members previously filling at non-specialty pharmacies (65.2% vs 84.8%). A statistically significant inverse relationship was found between baseline HAQ-II score and pre-transition PDC value (r = –0.200, p = .035) for 112 members with completed functional assessments. Conclusions: PDC is significantly correlated to HAQ-II scores at baseline, and adherence is also shown to increase for members transitioning from a non-specialty to specialty pharmacy. More analysis is needed to determine if the HAQ-II is an appropriate functionality questionnaire to assess RA disease status.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专业药房福利对类风湿性关节炎药物依从性和功能状态的影响:一项持续研究
摘要背景:类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者受益于肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂的引入;然而,多项研究报告称,药物依从性是次优的。专业药房提供各种管理策略,以提高RA患者的依从性,从而帮助改善疾病状况。目的:通过收集6至12岁的依从性数据来扩大初步分析结果 月和HAQ-II评分为12 将成员转移到专业药房后数月,以确定专业药房福利对RA药物依从性和功能状态的影响。方法:采用内部药物依从性应用程序进行回顾性分析。有TNF抑制剂申请的成员也包括在内,前提是他们在2017年5月1日至2017年12月31日(过渡前)、2018年1月1日-2018年8月31日和2018年9月1日–2019年4月30日(延期)的研究时间段内至少接受了两次填充。分析药房索赔,通过计算每个时间段的覆盖天数比例(PDC)来衡量依从性。将过渡后基线HAQ-II评分的成员与过渡后6个月和延期12个月的HAQ-II分数进行比较,以确定与依从性的相关性。结果:共纳入101名RA患者。在过渡之前,34%的会员在非专科药店配药,66%的会员在专科药店配药。过渡前在非专科药房配药的会员的基线、过渡后和延长时间段的PDC值分别为0.848、0.907和0.819,过渡前在专科药房填表的会员的PDC值则分别为0.904、0.889和0.818。达到所需依从性水平(PDC>0.8)的患者百分比在过渡后比之前在非专科药店配药的成员增加(65.2%比84.8%)。基线HAQ-II评分和过渡前PDC值之间存在统计学显著的负相关(r=–0.200,p = .035),用于完成功能评估的112名成员。结论:PDC与基线时的HAQ-II评分显著相关,从非专业药房过渡到专业药房的成员的依从性也有所增加。需要更多的分析来确定HAQ-II是否是评估RA疾病状态的适当功能问卷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Drug Assessment
Journal of Drug Assessment PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Treatment and comorbidity burden among people living with HIV: a review of systematic literature reviews. Investigation of potential substandard dry powder inhalers on EU and North African markets - evaluation of the delivered and fine particle doses. Real world evidence study on treatment patterns and health resource utilization in patients with HR+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in Korea. A review of the risks of long-term consequences associated with components of the CHOP chemotherapy regimen. Real-world experience of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis in an Arab population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1