The dynamics of governance capacity and legitimacy: the case of a digital tracing technology during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION International Public Management Journal Pub Date : 2022-09-09 DOI:10.1080/10967494.2022.2112328
Jonas Lund-Tønnesen, Tom Christensen
{"title":"The dynamics of governance capacity and legitimacy: the case of a digital tracing technology during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Jonas Lund-Tønnesen, Tom Christensen","doi":"10.1080/10967494.2022.2112328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Input, throughput, and output legitimacy of government measures are considered to be essential for governance capacity in crisis. During the COVID-19 crisis, governments around the world developed digital contact-tracing applications to support their crisis management—with varying degrees of success. While Norway is seen as a high performer in the crisis, the contact-tracing app called Smittestopp developed in Norway had little impact. Using a case study, we studied the governance capacity and legitimacy of this technology in terms of how it was developed, how much it was utilized by citizens, and its usefulness relative to other government measures. Although the app did very little to help the COVID-19 crisis management in Norway, we identify some important lessons to be learned. We argue that the initial input and throughput legitimacy is important if a government policy is to maintain output legitimacy over time and be effective in a crisis. Consequently, this study contributes to the literature on governance capacity and legitimacy in crisis management.","PeriodicalId":47671,"journal":{"name":"International Public Management Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"126 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Public Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2022.2112328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Input, throughput, and output legitimacy of government measures are considered to be essential for governance capacity in crisis. During the COVID-19 crisis, governments around the world developed digital contact-tracing applications to support their crisis management—with varying degrees of success. While Norway is seen as a high performer in the crisis, the contact-tracing app called Smittestopp developed in Norway had little impact. Using a case study, we studied the governance capacity and legitimacy of this technology in terms of how it was developed, how much it was utilized by citizens, and its usefulness relative to other government measures. Although the app did very little to help the COVID-19 crisis management in Norway, we identify some important lessons to be learned. We argue that the initial input and throughput legitimacy is important if a government policy is to maintain output legitimacy over time and be effective in a crisis. Consequently, this study contributes to the literature on governance capacity and legitimacy in crisis management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治理能力和合法性的动态:新冠肺炎大流行期间的数字追踪技术案例
摘要政府措施的投入、产出和产出合法性被认为对危机中的治理能力至关重要。在新冠肺炎危机期间,世界各国政府开发了数字联系人追踪应用程序,以支持其危机管理,并取得了不同程度的成功。虽然挪威在危机中表现出色,但在挪威开发的名为Smittestopp的联系人追踪应用程序几乎没有影响。通过案例研究,我们研究了这项技术的治理能力和合法性,包括它是如何发展的,公民对它的利用程度,以及它相对于其他政府措施的有用性。尽管该应用程序对挪威新冠肺炎危机管理的帮助很小,但我们确定了一些需要吸取的重要教训。我们认为,如果一项政府政策要在一段时间内保持产出的合法性,并在危机中有效,那么初始投入和吞吐量的合法性就很重要。因此,本研究有助于研究危机管理中的治理能力和合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The International Public Management Journal (IPMJ) publishes high-quality empirical and theoretical work on managing large organizations, particularly public organizations. IPMJ features work from scholars around the world who conduct research in the areas of public management and government reform, comparative public administration, organizational theory, and organizational behavior. IPMJ seeks to provide a bridge between those conducting research on public management and public administration on the one hand, and those working in the areas of organizational behavior and organization theory on the other. IPMJ intends to stimulate and reflect the academic interests of an international constituency of readers and scholars.
期刊最新文献
It takes two to tango: concepts and evidence of further integration of public service motivation theory and self-determination theory Deliberative Democracy, Public Policy, and Local Government Public value and the digital economy Controversies in employee-driven innovation: Exploring the Danish public healthcare Transforming public and private sector organizations: Implementing sustainable purpose, traveling organization and connectivity for resilience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1