Political communication in post-truth society

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Ars & Humanitas Pub Date : 2020-06-23 DOI:10.4312/ars.14.1.73-87
N. Gorenc
{"title":"Political communication in post-truth society","authors":"N. Gorenc","doi":"10.4312/ars.14.1.73-87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research behind this paper is set in the context of the 2016 US presidential election that has come to symbolize the post-truth era. We conducted a literature review on the 2016 election, with the aim to better understand the impact of computational propaganda on the election outcome and on the behaviour of voters. The paper opens with a definition of post-truth society and related concepts such as fake news and computational propaganda. It explores the changes of political communication in a digital environment and analyses the role of social media in the 2016 election. It probes into phenomena such as the trivialization of politics and the loss of credibility of political actors, which are both common in post-truth societies. The reviewed literature seems to indicate that social media have become strong actors on the political stage, but so far not the predominant source of political information and influence on the behaviour of voters. The paper makes two important contributions. Firstly, drawing on the concept of post-truth society, it analyses the role of computational propaganda in the 2016 presidential election, and secondly, it attempts to explain the paradox of general political apathy on one hand, and increased political activism on the other. These are some of the challenges we are now facing, and in order to be able to cope with them it is important to acknowledge and understand them.","PeriodicalId":40773,"journal":{"name":"Ars & Humanitas","volume":"14 1","pages":"73-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ars & Humanitas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4312/ars.14.1.73-87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The research behind this paper is set in the context of the 2016 US presidential election that has come to symbolize the post-truth era. We conducted a literature review on the 2016 election, with the aim to better understand the impact of computational propaganda on the election outcome and on the behaviour of voters. The paper opens with a definition of post-truth society and related concepts such as fake news and computational propaganda. It explores the changes of political communication in a digital environment and analyses the role of social media in the 2016 election. It probes into phenomena such as the trivialization of politics and the loss of credibility of political actors, which are both common in post-truth societies. The reviewed literature seems to indicate that social media have become strong actors on the political stage, but so far not the predominant source of political information and influence on the behaviour of voters. The paper makes two important contributions. Firstly, drawing on the concept of post-truth society, it analyses the role of computational propaganda in the 2016 presidential election, and secondly, it attempts to explain the paradox of general political apathy on one hand, and increased political activism on the other. These are some of the challenges we are now facing, and in order to be able to cope with them it is important to acknowledge and understand them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后真相社会中的政治传播
本文背后的研究背景是2016年美国总统大选,这场大选象征着后真相时代。我们对2016年大选进行了文献综述,目的是更好地了解计算宣传对选举结果和选民行为的影响。本文首先对后真相社会进行了定义,并提出了假新闻和计算宣传等相关概念。它探讨了数字环境下政治传播的变化,并分析了社交媒体在2016年大选中的作用。它探讨了政治的琐碎化和政治行为者信誉的丧失等现象,这两种现象在后真相社会中都很常见。经审查的文献似乎表明,社交媒体已成为政治舞台上的强大行动者,但迄今为止还不是政治信息和影响选民行为的主要来源。这篇论文有两个重要贡献。首先,借鉴后真相社会的概念,分析了计算宣传在2016年总统选举中的作用,其次,试图一方面解释普遍的政治冷漠和日益增长的政治激进主义的悖论。这些是我们现在面临的一些挑战,为了能够应对这些挑战,承认和理解它们很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ars & Humanitas
Ars & Humanitas HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Contactos e intercambios entre las literaturas de Europa Central y del Sureste y de América Latina durante la Guerra Fría Eslovenia y la Guerra Fría cultural The importance of separating the author from the narrative in modern and classical literature Zagovornik literarne izobrazbe pisateljev in kritikov Alkoholizem v delih slovenskih in čeških pisateljic dolgega 19. stoletja
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1