How Effective Is Aerobic Exercise Training in Improving Aerobic Capacity After Heart Transplant? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Keriann Groen, P. Robison, Annie Xiong, Kent E. Irwin, Amy B Stein, C. C. Evans
{"title":"How Effective Is Aerobic Exercise Training in Improving Aerobic Capacity After Heart Transplant? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Keriann Groen, P. Robison, Annie Xiong, Kent E. Irwin, Amy B Stein, C. C. Evans","doi":"10.1097/CPT.0000000000000159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Purpose: Studies suggest that additional exercise (Ex) training beyond “usual care” increases peak VO2 in people post-heart transplant (HTx); however, no recent studies have quantified improvements or compared moderate-intensity aerobic Ex (MOD) to high-intensity interval training (HIIT). The purpose of this study was to quantify improvements in VO2 for patients post-HTx undergoing additional Ex training and compare effectiveness of MOD to HIIT. Methods: Inclusion criteria were: randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses published between 2008 to 2018, subjects post-HTx, participated in an aerobic Ex program beyond usual care, and reported peak VO2. Results: A total of 242 records were obtained and 7 randomized clinical trials were reviewed. The average PEDro score was 4.86 (range 2–7). The within-group weighted mean difference (WMD) in peak VO2 comparing baseline to post-training for the Ex group = 3.3 (0.5) ml/kg/min and for the control group = −0.2 (0.2) ml/kg/min. The between-group WMD in peak VO2 = 3.5 (7.9) ml/kg/min, Hedge's g = 0.606 (95% confidence intervals = 0.337–0.874), P < .001, favoring Ex. Comparison between Ex protocols indicated that there was no difference between HIIT and MOD (Q = 1.83, P = .176). Conclusions: Physical therapists should challenge patients post-HTx with aerobic Ex that goes beyond usual post-HTx care and should consider incorporating HIIT into the treatment plan or home program to maximize the benefits of rehabilitation when possible.","PeriodicalId":72526,"journal":{"name":"Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal","volume":"32 1","pages":"114 - 128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CPT.0000000000000159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Purpose: Studies suggest that additional exercise (Ex) training beyond “usual care” increases peak VO2 in people post-heart transplant (HTx); however, no recent studies have quantified improvements or compared moderate-intensity aerobic Ex (MOD) to high-intensity interval training (HIIT). The purpose of this study was to quantify improvements in VO2 for patients post-HTx undergoing additional Ex training and compare effectiveness of MOD to HIIT. Methods: Inclusion criteria were: randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses published between 2008 to 2018, subjects post-HTx, participated in an aerobic Ex program beyond usual care, and reported peak VO2. Results: A total of 242 records were obtained and 7 randomized clinical trials were reviewed. The average PEDro score was 4.86 (range 2–7). The within-group weighted mean difference (WMD) in peak VO2 comparing baseline to post-training for the Ex group = 3.3 (0.5) ml/kg/min and for the control group = −0.2 (0.2) ml/kg/min. The between-group WMD in peak VO2 = 3.5 (7.9) ml/kg/min, Hedge's g = 0.606 (95% confidence intervals = 0.337–0.874), P < .001, favoring Ex. Comparison between Ex protocols indicated that there was no difference between HIIT and MOD (Q = 1.83, P = .176). Conclusions: Physical therapists should challenge patients post-HTx with aerobic Ex that goes beyond usual post-HTx care and should consider incorporating HIIT into the treatment plan or home program to maximize the benefits of rehabilitation when possible.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有氧运动训练对提高心脏移植后的有氧能力有多有效?系统回顾和荟萃分析
补充数字内容可在文本中获得。目的:研究表明,在“常规护理”之外的额外运动(Ex)训练可以增加心脏移植后患者的峰值VO2;然而,最近没有研究量化改善或比较中等强度有氧Ex (MOD)与高强度间歇训练(HIIT)。本研究的目的是量化htx后接受额外Ex训练的患者VO2的改善,并比较MOD与HIIT的有效性。方法:纳入标准为:2008年至2018年间发表的随机临床试验、系统评价或荟萃分析、htx后受试者、参加常规护理以外的有氧Ex计划,并报告VO2峰值。结果:共获得242份记录,回顾了7项随机临床试验。平均PEDro评分为4.86(范围2-7)。实验组与训练后相比,组内VO2峰值加权平均差(WMD) = 3.3 (0.5) ml/kg/min,对照组= - 0.2 (0.2)ml/kg/min。峰VO2组间WMD = 3.5 (7.9) ml/kg/min, Hedge’s g = 0.606(95%可信区间= 0.337 ~ 0.874),P < 0.001,支持Ex。Ex方案间比较表明HIIT与MOD之间无差异(Q = 1.83, P = 0.176)。结论:物理治疗师应该对htx后患者进行有氧Ex训练,以超越通常的htx后护理,并应考虑将HIIT纳入治疗计划或家庭计划,以尽可能最大化康复效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Associations between Physical Activity, Systemic Inflammation, and Hospital Admissions in Adults with Heart Failure. The Association Between Patient-Level Factors and Physical Function in Lung Transplant Recipients. From the Swimming Pool to Precision Cardiovascular Physical Therapy: What a Journey! Commentary on “Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Outpatients With Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Survey of Orthopedic and Sports Academies” Professional Community
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1