Diagnostic utility of abdominal ultrasound in the evaluation of abdomino-pelvic lesions at Bugando Medical Centre in Mwanza, Tanzania

Mohamed S. Binde, Godrey Kasanga, P. Chalya, W. Mahalu
{"title":"Diagnostic utility of abdominal ultrasound in the evaluation of abdomino-pelvic lesions at Bugando Medical Centre in Mwanza, Tanzania","authors":"Mohamed S. Binde, Godrey Kasanga, P. Chalya, W. Mahalu","doi":"10.4314/thrb.v20i3.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Despite the fact that abdominal ultrasound has been widely used in many centres in Tanzania as a primary diagnostic imaging for patients with abdomino-pelvic lesions, its diagnostic utility has not yet been assessed in Tanzania, and therefore its use as an alternative diagnostic tool in patients with abdomino-pelvic lesions is not justified. This study aimed to determine the utility of abdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of abdomino-pelvic lesions in our local setting.Methods: This was a cross sectional study to evaluate the diagnostic utility of abdominal ultrasound in patients presenting with abdomino-pelvic lesions at Bugando Medical Centre between January 2017 and July 2017. Abdominal ultrasonographic findings were cross-tabulated against operative findings (the gold standard). Then, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV) and accuracy were calculated to determine the diagnostic utility of abdominal ultrasound.Results: A total of 146 patients (M: F ratio = 1: 2.2) were studied. The mean age at diagnosis was 39.3 years. The diagnostic utility of abdominal ultrasound in terms of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were 39.4-100%, 0-100%, 64.7-100%, 0-100% and 40.8-100% respectively.  The kappa statistic (қ) showed good to excellent agreement with the operative findings, the gold standard (қ = 0.75-1.00).Conclusion: The diagnostic utility of abdominal ultrasound in detecting abdomino-pelvic lesions is much lower than that seen in developed countries, hence, abdominal ultrasound is not a reliable tool in detecting abdomino-pelvic lesions at Bugando Medical Centre and therefore its use should be supplemented with abdominal CT scan in selected cases.","PeriodicalId":39815,"journal":{"name":"Tanzania Journal of Health Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanzania Journal of Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/thrb.v20i3.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Despite the fact that abdominal ultrasound has been widely used in many centres in Tanzania as a primary diagnostic imaging for patients with abdomino-pelvic lesions, its diagnostic utility has not yet been assessed in Tanzania, and therefore its use as an alternative diagnostic tool in patients with abdomino-pelvic lesions is not justified. This study aimed to determine the utility of abdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of abdomino-pelvic lesions in our local setting.Methods: This was a cross sectional study to evaluate the diagnostic utility of abdominal ultrasound in patients presenting with abdomino-pelvic lesions at Bugando Medical Centre between January 2017 and July 2017. Abdominal ultrasonographic findings were cross-tabulated against operative findings (the gold standard). Then, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV) and accuracy were calculated to determine the diagnostic utility of abdominal ultrasound.Results: A total of 146 patients (M: F ratio = 1: 2.2) were studied. The mean age at diagnosis was 39.3 years. The diagnostic utility of abdominal ultrasound in terms of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were 39.4-100%, 0-100%, 64.7-100%, 0-100% and 40.8-100% respectively.  The kappa statistic (қ) showed good to excellent agreement with the operative findings, the gold standard (қ = 0.75-1.00).Conclusion: The diagnostic utility of abdominal ultrasound in detecting abdomino-pelvic lesions is much lower than that seen in developed countries, hence, abdominal ultrasound is not a reliable tool in detecting abdomino-pelvic lesions at Bugando Medical Centre and therefore its use should be supplemented with abdominal CT scan in selected cases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在坦桑尼亚姆万扎的布甘多医疗中心,腹部超声在评估腹部-盆腔病变中的诊断效用
背景:尽管腹部超声已在坦桑尼亚的许多中心被广泛用作腹盆腔病变患者的主要诊断成像,但其诊断效用尚未在坦桑尼亚得到评估,因此将其用作腹盆腔损伤患者的替代诊断工具是不合理的。本研究旨在确定腹部超声在我们的局部环境中诊断腹盆腔病变的实用性。方法:这是一项横断面研究,旨在评估腹部超声在布甘多医疗中心2017年1月至2017年7月期间对腹盆腔病变患者的诊断效用。腹部超声检查结果与手术结果对照(金标准)。然后,计算腹部超声的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性,以确定腹部超声的诊断效用。结果:共对146例患者进行了研究(男:女比例=1:2.2)。诊断时的平均年龄为39.3岁。腹部超声诊断的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV和准确性分别为39.4-100%、0-100%、64.7-100%、0-100%和40.8-100%。kappa统计量(=0.75-1.00)与手术结果、金标准(=0.75-100)显示出良好的一致性。结论:腹部超声在检测腹盆腔病变中的诊断实用性远低于发达国家,因此,在布甘多医疗中心,腹部超声不是检测腹盆腔病变的可靠工具,因此在选定的病例中,应辅以腹部CT扫描。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tanzania Journal of Health Research
Tanzania Journal of Health Research Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Knowledge on the Risk Factors for Diabetic Foot Syndrome and Self-Foot Care Practices among Diabetic Patients at Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Study. Antimicrobial Resistance among neonates with neonatal Sepsis Morogoro Tanzania Risk factors of delayed developmental milestones among infants attending RCH clinics in Dodoma region. A cross-sectional studydoma region Nutritional Status Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients, Tanzania Factors Associated with Anthropometric Status of Primary School Children in Dodoma, Tanzaniaania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1