Inequality at the Starting Line: Underrepresentation in Gifted Identification and Disparities in Early Achievement

IF 3.5 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Aera Open Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23328584231171535
D. Long, D. McCoach, Del Siegle, C. Callahan, E. J. Gubbins
{"title":"Inequality at the Starting Line: Underrepresentation in Gifted Identification and Disparities in Early Achievement","authors":"D. Long, D. McCoach, Del Siegle, C. Callahan, E. J. Gubbins","doi":"10.1177/23328584231171535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is underrepresentation of Black students, Latinx students, English learners (EL), and students from economically challenging communities in gifted programs due to inequality in early academic achievement or bias in the gifted identification process? Using three-level multilevel logistic models, we examine the degree to which the disparities in gifted identification are due to disparities in early achievement. Our datasets include 3rd-, 4th-, and 5th-grade achievement scores and demographic variables from all students in a 3rd-grade, 2011–2012 cohort across three states. Students who qualified for free/reduced-price lunch (FRPL), EL, and Black or Latinx students were between two to eight times less likely to be identified as gifted compared to non–free/reduced-price lunch, non-EL, and White or Asian students. However, between 50% and 100% of gifted identification disparities could be explained by student-level differences in early academic achievement, which is consistent with an opportunity gap explanation of underrepresentation.","PeriodicalId":31132,"journal":{"name":"Aera Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aera Open","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231171535","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Is underrepresentation of Black students, Latinx students, English learners (EL), and students from economically challenging communities in gifted programs due to inequality in early academic achievement or bias in the gifted identification process? Using three-level multilevel logistic models, we examine the degree to which the disparities in gifted identification are due to disparities in early achievement. Our datasets include 3rd-, 4th-, and 5th-grade achievement scores and demographic variables from all students in a 3rd-grade, 2011–2012 cohort across three states. Students who qualified for free/reduced-price lunch (FRPL), EL, and Black or Latinx students were between two to eight times less likely to be identified as gifted compared to non–free/reduced-price lunch, non-EL, and White or Asian students. However, between 50% and 100% of gifted identification disparities could be explained by student-level differences in early academic achievement, which is consistent with an opportunity gap explanation of underrepresentation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
起跑线上的不平等:天才识别中的代表性不足和早期成就的差异
黑人学生、拉丁裔学生、英语学习者(EL)和来自具有经济挑战性社区的学生在天才项目中的代表性不足是由于早期学业成绩的不平等还是天才识别过程中的偏见?使用三级多层次逻辑模型,我们检验了天赋识别的差异在多大程度上是由于早期成就的差异造成的。我们的数据集包括三个州2011-2012年三年级所有学生的三年级、四年级和五年级成绩分数和人口统计变量。符合免费/降价午餐(FRPL)、EL和黑人或拉丁裔学生资格的学生被认定为天才的可能性是非免费/降价午饭、非EL和白人或亚裔学生的两到八倍。然而,50%至100%的天赋认同差异可以用早期学业成绩的学生水平差异来解释,这与代表性不足的机会差距解释是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aera Open
Aera Open EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
60
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cross-National Comparison of the Relative Size of Lower-Tail and Upper-Tail SES Achievement Gaps Measuring the Efficacy of Zearn Math in Louisiana Undergraduate Grading Practices of International and Domestic Faculty: Evidence From Three Large U.S. Public Universities Does Knowing the Word Matter for Preschool DLLS? Individualized Vocabulary Words on Phonological Awareness Performance Silent Covenants and Structural Barriers: State Standards Committees and the Maintenance of Race-Evasive Social Studies Standards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1