DO TAYLORISMO/FORDISMO À ACUMULAÇÃO FLEXÍVEL: IMPLICAÇÕES DOS REGIMES DE ACUMULAÇÃO PARA O MUNDO DO TRABALHO

IF 0.7 Q4 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Labour-England Pub Date : 2017-07-31 DOI:10.29148/LABOR.V1I17.19299
João Kaio Cavalcante de Morais, D. H. Moura
{"title":"DO TAYLORISMO/FORDISMO À ACUMULAÇÃO FLEXÍVEL: IMPLICAÇÕES DOS REGIMES DE ACUMULAÇÃO PARA O MUNDO DO TRABALHO","authors":"João Kaio Cavalcante de Morais, D. H. Moura","doi":"10.29148/LABOR.V1I17.19299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"FROM TAYLORISM / FORDISM TO FLEXIBLE ACCUMULATION: IMPLICATIONS OF THE ACCUMULATION SCHEMES FOR THE WORLD OF WORK Resumo: Como atividade predominantemente humana, o trabalho se constitui enquanto acao de transformacao da natureza para suprir as necessidades e os interesses dos homens. Apesar disso, nota-se que esse sentido foi desapropriado pela logica do capital ao longo dos ultimos tres (3) seculos. Esse artigo tem como objetivo analisar a categoria trabalho no contexto dos regimes de acumulacao de capital. Para isso, consultou-se os textos de Marx (1980), Harvey (2014), Antunes (2009), dentre outros. O que caracterizou essa pesquisa enquanto bibliografica a partir de uma abordagem qualitativa. Percebeu-se, a partir dos textos dos autores, a existencia de 2 (dois) regimes de acumulacao: o Taylorismo/Fordismo e a Acumulacao Flexivel. O primeiro teve como principal caracteristica a producao em massa e a divisao do trabalho em manual e intelectual. Ja no segundo notou-se uma maior flexibilizacao da producao, com o intuito de atender as demandas do mercado, o que ocasionou mudancas significativas no mundo do trabalho, culminando em jornadas de trabalho mais flexiveis, empregos temporarios e terceirizados, bem como perda de direitos trabalhistas. Abstract: Work is an action of transformation of nature to meet the needs and interests of men. This sense has been expropriated by the logic of capital over the last three (3) centuries. The purpose of this article is to analyze the category of labor in the context of capital accumulation regimes. We have recourse to Marx (1980), Harvey (2014), Antunes (2009). What characterized this research as a bibliographical from a qualitative approach. From the authors' texts, we can see the existence of two (2) regimes of accumulation: Taylorism / Fordism and Flexible Accumulation. The first one had as main characteristic the mass production and the division of the work in manual and intellectual. In the second, production was more flexible, in order to meet the demands of the market, which led to significant changes in the world of work, culminating in more flexible working hours, temporary and outsourced jobs, as well as loss of rights Labor markets. Keywords: work – capitalismo – Fordism – Flexible build-up.","PeriodicalId":45843,"journal":{"name":"Labour-England","volume":"1 1","pages":"62-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour-England","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29148/LABOR.V1I17.19299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

FROM TAYLORISM / FORDISM TO FLEXIBLE ACCUMULATION: IMPLICATIONS OF THE ACCUMULATION SCHEMES FOR THE WORLD OF WORK Resumo: Como atividade predominantemente humana, o trabalho se constitui enquanto acao de transformacao da natureza para suprir as necessidades e os interesses dos homens. Apesar disso, nota-se que esse sentido foi desapropriado pela logica do capital ao longo dos ultimos tres (3) seculos. Esse artigo tem como objetivo analisar a categoria trabalho no contexto dos regimes de acumulacao de capital. Para isso, consultou-se os textos de Marx (1980), Harvey (2014), Antunes (2009), dentre outros. O que caracterizou essa pesquisa enquanto bibliografica a partir de uma abordagem qualitativa. Percebeu-se, a partir dos textos dos autores, a existencia de 2 (dois) regimes de acumulacao: o Taylorismo/Fordismo e a Acumulacao Flexivel. O primeiro teve como principal caracteristica a producao em massa e a divisao do trabalho em manual e intelectual. Ja no segundo notou-se uma maior flexibilizacao da producao, com o intuito de atender as demandas do mercado, o que ocasionou mudancas significativas no mundo do trabalho, culminando em jornadas de trabalho mais flexiveis, empregos temporarios e terceirizados, bem como perda de direitos trabalhistas. Abstract: Work is an action of transformation of nature to meet the needs and interests of men. This sense has been expropriated by the logic of capital over the last three (3) centuries. The purpose of this article is to analyze the category of labor in the context of capital accumulation regimes. We have recourse to Marx (1980), Harvey (2014), Antunes (2009). What characterized this research as a bibliographical from a qualitative approach. From the authors' texts, we can see the existence of two (2) regimes of accumulation: Taylorism / Fordism and Flexible Accumulation. The first one had as main characteristic the mass production and the division of the work in manual and intellectual. In the second, production was more flexible, in order to meet the demands of the market, which led to significant changes in the world of work, culminating in more flexible working hours, temporary and outsourced jobs, as well as loss of rights Labor markets. Keywords: work – capitalismo – Fordism – Flexible build-up.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从泰勒主义/福德主义到灵活积累:积累机制对工作世界的启示
摘要:作为一种主要的人类活动,工作本身就是一种改变自然以满足人类需求和利益的行动。然而,值得注意的是,在过去的三(3)个世纪里,这种感觉被资本的逻辑所剥夺。本文旨在分析资本积累制度背景下的工作类别。为此,我们查阅了马克思(1980)、哈维(2014)、安图内斯(2009)等人的著作。是什么从定性的角度将这项研究描述为文献学。从作者的文本中可以注意到,存在两(2)种积累制度:泰勒主义/福特主义和灵活积累。第一个主要特点是大规模生产,将劳动分为体力劳动和智力劳动。在第二次会议上,人们已经注意到,为了满足市场的需求,生产有了更大的灵活性,这导致了工作世界的重大变化,最终导致了更灵活的工作时间、临时和外包工作,以及劳工权利的丧失。工作是一种改变自然以满足人类需求和利益的行为。在过去的三(3)个世纪里,这种感觉已经被资本的逻辑所剥夺。本文的目的是分析资本积累制度背景下的劳动力类别。我们求助于马克思(1980),哈维(2014),安图内斯(2009)。是什么将这项研究从定性的角度描述为书目。从作者的文本中,我们可以看到两种积累机制的存在:泰勒主义/福特主义和柔性积累。第一个主要特点是大规模生产和手工与智力的分工。第二,为了满足市场的需求,生产更加灵活,这导致了工作世界的重大变化,最终导致了更灵活的工作时间、临时和外包工作,以及劳动力市场的权利丧失。关键词:工作——资本主义——福特主义——灵活构建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Labour-England
Labour-England INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: LABOUR provides a forum for analysis and debate on issues concerning labour economics and industrial relations. The Journal publishes high quality contributions which combine economic theory and statistical methodology in order to analyse behaviour, institutions and policies relevant to the labour market.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Discrimination toward the visually impaired and quota policies in the labor market The impact of a multifaceted program on fragile individuals. Evidence from an RCT in Italy Issue Information Fiscal financing with labour markets frictions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1