HARDINESS AND COPING STRATEGIES OF MEDICAL WORKERS IN COUNTERING EMOTIONAL BURNOUT (DURING THE FOURTH WAVE OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN RUSSIA)

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture Pub Date : 2022-12-25 DOI:10.12731/2658-6649-2022-14-6-226-262
P. Kislyakov, E. Shmeleva, Tatiana V. Karaseva, O. Silaeva, Danila A. Prijatkin
{"title":"HARDINESS AND COPING STRATEGIES OF MEDICAL WORKERS IN COUNTERING EMOTIONAL BURNOUT (DURING THE FOURTH WAVE OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN RUSSIA)","authors":"P. Kislyakov, E. Shmeleva, Tatiana V. Karaseva, O. Silaeva, Danila A. Prijatkin","doi":"10.12731/2658-6649-2022-14-6-226-262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the problem of psychological well-being of medical workers is becoming particularly relevant. The appeal of physicians to intrapersonal hardiness resources, the use of optimal coping strategies for long-term work in a pandemic increases the likelihood of a more favorable passage of a stressful period and a decrease in emotional burnout. \nGoal. To identify the specifics of emotional burnout of medical workers during the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the context of the characteristics of the state of hardiness and the use of coping strategies. Adaptation to the Russian language of the methodology “Burnout scale in COVID-19 (COVID-19-BS)” (M. Yıldırım, F. Solmaz). \nMaterials and methods of research. The study was conducted in November-December 2021. The study sample included 128 medical workers: 37.5% doctors, 47% middle and junior medical personnel, 15.5% medical students who volunteered to work in medical institutions during the pandemic; 23% men, 77% women; aged 21 to 63 years (M=35 years). The study was conducted in the city of Ivanovo (47%), the city of Moscow and the Moscow region (57%). The following techniques were used: “The test of hardiness” (S. Muddy, in the Russian-language adaptation of E.N. Osin, E.I. Rasskazova), “Questionnaire of coping methods” (OSS) (R. Lazarus, S. Folkman, in the Russian-language adaptation of T.L. Kryukova, E.V. Kuftyak, M.S. Zamyshlyaeva), “Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemics - 9 items (SAVE-9) for Healthcare workers” (S. Chang with et al.; in the Russian-language adaptation by S.E. Mosolova et al.), “Burnout scale in COVID-19 (COVID-19-BS)” (M. Yildirim, F. Solmaz). The empirical data obtained were interpreted and processed using qualitative and quantitative methods of analysis, including: descriptive statistics, Spearman correlation analysis, linear regression analysis (step selection method), Mann-Whitney U-test. \nResults. The study showed that every third medical employee at work during the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Russia, in the context of the COVID-19 epidemic, experiences stress and anxiety, shows signs of emotional burnout. Two-thirds of medical workers as a whole have demonstrated a sufficient level of hardiness development. Hardiness parameters are negatively associated with anxiety and emotional burnout of physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic. The greatest durability of this effect is provided by such parameters of resilience as “engagement” and “risk taking”. Which indicates that hardiness may be a protective factor for medical professionals. The most implemented coping strategies among physicians are problem solving planning, social support search, self-control, positive reassessment. The choice of non-constructive copings (confrontation, distancing, escape-avoidance) promotes the development of emotional burnout. The study confirmed the reliability and validity of the COVID-19-BS questionnaire for measuring emotional burnout associated with COVID-19. \nConclusion. The data obtained on the peculiarities of the psychological state of medical workers during the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic indicate the need to continue work related to their psychological support and support for their personal and professional development, prevention of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.","PeriodicalId":21854,"journal":{"name":"Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-6649-2022-14-6-226-262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the problem of psychological well-being of medical workers is becoming particularly relevant. The appeal of physicians to intrapersonal hardiness resources, the use of optimal coping strategies for long-term work in a pandemic increases the likelihood of a more favorable passage of a stressful period and a decrease in emotional burnout. Goal. To identify the specifics of emotional burnout of medical workers during the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the context of the characteristics of the state of hardiness and the use of coping strategies. Adaptation to the Russian language of the methodology “Burnout scale in COVID-19 (COVID-19-BS)” (M. Yıldırım, F. Solmaz). Materials and methods of research. The study was conducted in November-December 2021. The study sample included 128 medical workers: 37.5% doctors, 47% middle and junior medical personnel, 15.5% medical students who volunteered to work in medical institutions during the pandemic; 23% men, 77% women; aged 21 to 63 years (M=35 years). The study was conducted in the city of Ivanovo (47%), the city of Moscow and the Moscow region (57%). The following techniques were used: “The test of hardiness” (S. Muddy, in the Russian-language adaptation of E.N. Osin, E.I. Rasskazova), “Questionnaire of coping methods” (OSS) (R. Lazarus, S. Folkman, in the Russian-language adaptation of T.L. Kryukova, E.V. Kuftyak, M.S. Zamyshlyaeva), “Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemics - 9 items (SAVE-9) for Healthcare workers” (S. Chang with et al.; in the Russian-language adaptation by S.E. Mosolova et al.), “Burnout scale in COVID-19 (COVID-19-BS)” (M. Yildirim, F. Solmaz). The empirical data obtained were interpreted and processed using qualitative and quantitative methods of analysis, including: descriptive statistics, Spearman correlation analysis, linear regression analysis (step selection method), Mann-Whitney U-test. Results. The study showed that every third medical employee at work during the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Russia, in the context of the COVID-19 epidemic, experiences stress and anxiety, shows signs of emotional burnout. Two-thirds of medical workers as a whole have demonstrated a sufficient level of hardiness development. Hardiness parameters are negatively associated with anxiety and emotional burnout of physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic. The greatest durability of this effect is provided by such parameters of resilience as “engagement” and “risk taking”. Which indicates that hardiness may be a protective factor for medical professionals. The most implemented coping strategies among physicians are problem solving planning, social support search, self-control, positive reassessment. The choice of non-constructive copings (confrontation, distancing, escape-avoidance) promotes the development of emotional burnout. The study confirmed the reliability and validity of the COVID-19-BS questionnaire for measuring emotional burnout associated with COVID-19. Conclusion. The data obtained on the peculiarities of the psychological state of medical workers during the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic indicate the need to continue work related to their psychological support and support for their personal and professional development, prevention of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗工作者应对情绪爆发的努力和应对策略(在俄罗斯第四波新冠肺炎疫情期间)
在新冠肺炎大流行的背景下,医务工作者的心理健康问题变得尤为重要。医生对个人坚韧资源的吸引力,以及在疫情中长期工作的最佳应对策略的使用,增加了更有利地度过压力期和减少情绪倦怠的可能性。球门在第四波新冠肺炎大流行期间,在坚韧状态的特征和应对策略的使用的背景下,确定医务工作者情绪倦怠的具体情况。“新冠肺炎(COVID-19-BS)中的燃尽量表”方法的俄语改编(M.YıldırıM,F.Solmaz)。研究材料和方法。该研究于2021年11月至12月进行。研究样本包括128名医务工作者:37.5%的医生、47%的中级和初级医务人员、15.5%的在疫情期间自愿在医疗机构工作的医学生;23%为男性,77%为女性;年龄21~63岁(M=35岁)。这项研究在伊万诺沃市(47%)、莫斯科市和莫斯科地区(57%)进行。使用了以下技术:“坚韧性测试”(S.Muddy,E.N.Osin,E.I.Rasskazova的俄语改编版),“应对方法问卷”(OSS)(R.Lazarus,S.Folkman,T.L.Kryukova,E.V.Kuftyak,M.S.Zamyshlyaeva的俄语翻译版),“病毒流行病的压力和焦虑-医护人员的9个项目(SAVE-9)”(S.Chang with等人;S.E.Mosolova等人的俄语改编),“新冠肺炎(COVID-19-BS)中的倦怠量表”(M.Yildirim,F.Solmaz)。使用定性和定量分析方法对获得的经验数据进行解释和处理,包括:描述性统计、Spearman相关性分析、线性回归分析(步长选择法)、Mann-Whitney U检验。后果研究表明,在俄罗斯第四波新冠肺炎疫情期间,在新冠肺炎疫情的背景下,每三分之一的医务人员在工作时都会经历压力和焦虑,表现出情绪倦怠的迹象。三分之二的医务工作者作为一个整体表现出了足够的坚韧发展水平。在新冠肺炎大流行期间,顽固性参数与医生的焦虑和情绪耗竭呈负相关。这种影响的最大持久性是由“参与”和“承担风险”等弹性参数提供的。这表明坚韧可能是医疗专业人员的一个保护因素。医生最常用的应对策略是制定解决问题的计划、寻求社会支持、自我控制和积极的重新评估。选择非建设性的措辞(对抗、疏远、逃避)会促进情绪倦怠的发展。该研究证实了COVID-19-BS问卷用于测量与新冠肺炎相关的情绪倦怠的可靠性和有效性。结论获得的关于新冠肺炎第四波疫情期间医务人员心理状态特点的数据表明,需要继续开展与心理支持和支持个人和职业发展、预防抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍有关的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture
Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
ELECTRICAL ACTIVITY OF THE HUMAN HEART DURING THE PERIOD OF VENTRICULAR DEPOLARIZATION UNDER ACUTE NORMOBARIC HYPOXIA MORPHOTYPIC COMPOSITION AND DIFENOCONAZOLE SENSITIVITY OF APPLE SCAB PATHOGEN POPULATIONS THAT DIFFER IN THE HISTORY OF FUNGICIDE APPLICATION ECOLOGICAL MONITORING OF THE RECLAMATION PROCESSES OF THE QUARRY COMPLEXES OF CRIMEA INFLUENCE OF TECHNOLOGICAL STRESS ON NON-SPECIFIC RESISTANCE OF THE ORGANISM OF COWS INDICATORS OF DOWNY FIBER DIAMETER OF TUVA MALE GOATS DEPENDING ON AGE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1