Understanding Russia’s Actions in Ukraine as the Crime of Genocide

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Journal of International Criminal Justice Pub Date : 2023-06-13 DOI:10.1093/jicj/mqad018
Denys Azarov, D. Koval, Gaiane Nuridzhanian, Volodymyr Venher
{"title":"Understanding Russia’s Actions in Ukraine as the Crime of Genocide","authors":"Denys Azarov, D. Koval, Gaiane Nuridzhanian, Volodymyr Venher","doi":"10.1093/jicj/mqad018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The new wave of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine that began on 24 February 2022, and the intensification of the armed conflict accompanied by grave breaches of international humanitarian law, has received significant scholarly attention. Many academic interventions have examined the developments in Ukraine through the frameworks of jus ad bellum and jus in bello. Some, however, have applied a genocide lens to make sense of reported numerous and widespread violations of international humanitarian and human rights law. This article contributes to the latter stream of scholarship by contextualizing the arguments for the existence of genocidal intent behind the seemingly unrelated crimes committed by the armed forces of the Russian Federation all over Ukraine. The authors pay particular attention to the language and pseudo-historical references used by Russia’s leaders as a justification for the invasion of Ukraine and argue that these statements and expressions indicate the existence of genocidal intent. This article also reflects on the issue of the systematic destruction of cultural heritage of Ukraine as further evidence of the intent to destroy the Ukrainian nation understood as a protected national group under the Genocide Convention, at least in part. Finally, the authors analyse the genocidal acts that have apparently been committed, including killings; the causing of serious bodily or mental harm; the forcible transfer of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the deliberate infliction of conditions of life aimed at the physical destruction of the Ukrainian nation. It is stressed that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the destruction of the Ukrainian nation by Russia has been pursued through commission of these prohibited acts. Their nature and large-scale character serve as further evidence of genocidal intent to destroy the Ukrainian nation.","PeriodicalId":46732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Criminal Justice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqad018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The new wave of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine that began on 24 February 2022, and the intensification of the armed conflict accompanied by grave breaches of international humanitarian law, has received significant scholarly attention. Many academic interventions have examined the developments in Ukraine through the frameworks of jus ad bellum and jus in bello. Some, however, have applied a genocide lens to make sense of reported numerous and widespread violations of international humanitarian and human rights law. This article contributes to the latter stream of scholarship by contextualizing the arguments for the existence of genocidal intent behind the seemingly unrelated crimes committed by the armed forces of the Russian Federation all over Ukraine. The authors pay particular attention to the language and pseudo-historical references used by Russia’s leaders as a justification for the invasion of Ukraine and argue that these statements and expressions indicate the existence of genocidal intent. This article also reflects on the issue of the systematic destruction of cultural heritage of Ukraine as further evidence of the intent to destroy the Ukrainian nation understood as a protected national group under the Genocide Convention, at least in part. Finally, the authors analyse the genocidal acts that have apparently been committed, including killings; the causing of serious bodily or mental harm; the forcible transfer of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the deliberate infliction of conditions of life aimed at the physical destruction of the Ukrainian nation. It is stressed that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the destruction of the Ukrainian nation by Russia has been pursued through commission of these prohibited acts. Their nature and large-scale character serve as further evidence of genocidal intent to destroy the Ukrainian nation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将俄罗斯在乌克兰的行为理解为种族灭绝罪
2022年2月24日开始的俄罗斯对乌克兰的新一波侵略,以及伴随着严重违反国际人道主义法而加剧的武装冲突,引起了学术界的高度关注。许多学术干预都通过战争法和战争法的框架审查了乌克兰的事态发展。然而,一些人从种族灭绝的角度来理解报道的大量和广泛违反国际人道主义法和人权法的行为。这篇文章通过将俄罗斯联邦武装部队在乌克兰各地犯下的看似无关的罪行背后存在种族灭绝意图的论点置于背景中,为后一种学术流做出了贡献。作者特别关注俄罗斯领导人用来为入侵乌克兰辩护的语言和伪历史参考,并认为这些言论和表达表明存在种族灭绝意图。这篇文章还反映了有系统地破坏乌克兰文化遗产的问题,认为这是意图摧毁被视为《灭绝种族罪公约》保护民族的乌克兰民族的进一步证据,至少部分是这样。最后,作者分析了显然已经实施的种族灭绝行为,包括杀戮;造成严重的身体或精神伤害;将乌克兰儿童强行转移到俄罗斯,以及蓄意施加生活条件,目的是对乌克兰民族进行人身毁灭。有人强调,有合理的理由相信,俄罗斯是通过实施这些被禁止的行为来摧毁乌克兰的。它们的性质和大规模特征进一步证明了摧毁乌克兰民族的种族灭绝意图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
22.20%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Criminal Justice aims to promote a profound collective reflection on the new problems facing international law. Established by a group of distinguished criminal lawyers and international lawyers, the Journal addresses the major problems of justice from the angle of law, jurisprudence, criminology, penal philosophy, and the history of international judicial institutions. It is intended for graduate and post-graduate students, practitioners, academics, government officials, as well as the hundreds of people working for international criminal courts.
期刊最新文献
The Biological Weapons Amendment to the ICC Statute and National Provisions Victims’ Perspectives on Participation in the Ongwen Case Witnessing Ongwen The Ongwen Case at the International Criminal Court as a Test of the Court’s Outreach Programming in Northern Uganda Targeted Sanctions as a Pathway to Accountability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1