The nature of technology and engineering (NOTE) as perceived by science and technology teachers in Korea

IF 1.8 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research in Science & Technological Education Pub Date : 2021-05-12 DOI:10.1080/02635143.2021.1924656
Sejung Kim, Jinwoong Song
{"title":"The nature of technology and engineering (NOTE) as perceived by science and technology teachers in Korea","authors":"Sejung Kim, Jinwoong Song","doi":"10.1080/02635143.2021.1924656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose This study wants to identify how teachers perceive technology and engineering as distinct entities and develop a framework of NOTE. Design and methods To develop the NOTE framework, this study conducted interviews with eight secondary school teachers, comprising four technology and four science teachers. To examine how the teachers perceive technology and engineering and distinguish them, transcriptions of the interviews were analyzed using phenomenography. Results The results show that all research participants appeared to distinguish technology and engineering in some ways, but with varying degrees. In addition, their perceptions expressed through the interviews were categorized into 11 elements in three domains of the NOTE. The teachers’ perceptions also appeared to be influenced by language. As many Korean words are based on Chinese characters, teachers often understood the terms through the meanings of the Chinese characters. Teachers were confused between the Korean terms and their corresponding English terms because what the terms connote are different in each language. Conclusion This study provides useful information concerning NOTE by analyzing how teachers perceive technology and engineering, which could be helpful in teaching STEM based on NOTE.","PeriodicalId":46656,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science & Technological Education","volume":"41 1","pages":"596 - 613"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02635143.2021.1924656","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science & Technological Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1924656","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose This study wants to identify how teachers perceive technology and engineering as distinct entities and develop a framework of NOTE. Design and methods To develop the NOTE framework, this study conducted interviews with eight secondary school teachers, comprising four technology and four science teachers. To examine how the teachers perceive technology and engineering and distinguish them, transcriptions of the interviews were analyzed using phenomenography. Results The results show that all research participants appeared to distinguish technology and engineering in some ways, but with varying degrees. In addition, their perceptions expressed through the interviews were categorized into 11 elements in three domains of the NOTE. The teachers’ perceptions also appeared to be influenced by language. As many Korean words are based on Chinese characters, teachers often understood the terms through the meanings of the Chinese characters. Teachers were confused between the Korean terms and their corresponding English terms because what the terms connote are different in each language. Conclusion This study provides useful information concerning NOTE by analyzing how teachers perceive technology and engineering, which could be helpful in teaching STEM based on NOTE.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国科技教师对技术与工程(注)本质的认知
摘要目的本研究旨在确定教师如何将技术和工程视为不同的实体,并开发一个NOTE框架。设计和方法为了开发NOTE框架,本研究对八名中学教师进行了访谈,其中包括四名技术教师和四名科学教师。为了检验教师如何看待技术和工程并将其区分开来,使用现象学对访谈的转录进行了分析。结果研究结果表明,所有研究参与者似乎在某些方面区分了技术和工程,但程度不同。此外,他们通过访谈表达的看法被分为注释三个领域的11个要素。教师的认知似乎也受到语言的影响。由于许多韩语单词都是以汉字为基础的,教师通常通过汉字的含义来理解这些术语。老师们对韩语术语和相应的英语术语感到困惑,因为每种语言的术语含义不同。结论本研究通过分析教师对技术和工程的认知,为基于NOTE的STEM教学提供了有益的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Science & Technological Education
Research in Science & Technological Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Ocean wave energy learning project (OWELP): a program to communicate alternative energy technology Development and use of an instrument to measure pseudoscientific beliefs in quantum mechanics: the PSEUDO-QM scale Teachers’ views on the potential of school science clubs for enhancing their learning Turkish adaptation of the science-P reasoning inventory: examining the relationships between epistemological beliefs, gender, and residential area Navigating the AI-Enhanced STEM education landscape: a decade of insights, trends, and opportunities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1