The course of mediation proceedings on the basis of the rules of organization and conducting out-of-court mediation at the stage of executive proceedings

Probacja Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0016.1262
Damian Bara
{"title":"The course of mediation proceedings on the basis of the rules of organization and conducting out-of-court mediation at the stage of executive proceedings","authors":"Damian Bara","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.1262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mediation as an alternative method of dispute resolution is gaining more and more popularity in various areas of social life. The currently binding legal acts regulating the issues related to serving a sentence of imprisonment do not contain provisions on the use of mediation as an amicable method of dispute resolution giving the possibility of reconciliation between the perpetrator of the prohibited act for which the court adjudicated the penalty of imprisonment, and the victim of the crime. Therefore, it should be clarified whether the lack of regulations in the indicated scope constitutes an obstacle to the use of mediation after the end of criminal proceedings as an element implementing the idea of restorative justice.\n The aim of this study is to present the course of mediation proceedings conducted after the end of the criminal trial. The analysis of the course of the mediation procedure will be carried out on the basis of the provisions of the regulations developed for the implementation of the project entitled: “Pilot of the program implementing the idea of restorative justice in the District Inspectorate of Prison Service in Lublin”.\n The article is divided into nine parts. The first part is an introduction to the considerations on the idea of restorative justice allowing for reconciliation between the inmate and the victim of the crime. The next part is devoted to international regulations, which constitute the basis for the use of mediation at the stage following the end of criminal proceedings. Parts from three to eight contain an overview of the course and organization of the mediation procedure based on the provisions of the regulations developed for the implementation of the Pilot Project, from the moment of its initiation to its completion. The last part summarizes the analysis performed.\nThe considerations presented in the article lead to the conclusion that the lack of regulations in generally applicable acts of law does not constitute an obstacle to the use of post-conviction mediation as a method enabling the implementation of the idea of restorative justice and giving the possibility of reconciliation between the perpetrator of the prohibited act and the victim of the crime.\n\n","PeriodicalId":34028,"journal":{"name":"Probacja","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Probacja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mediation as an alternative method of dispute resolution is gaining more and more popularity in various areas of social life. The currently binding legal acts regulating the issues related to serving a sentence of imprisonment do not contain provisions on the use of mediation as an amicable method of dispute resolution giving the possibility of reconciliation between the perpetrator of the prohibited act for which the court adjudicated the penalty of imprisonment, and the victim of the crime. Therefore, it should be clarified whether the lack of regulations in the indicated scope constitutes an obstacle to the use of mediation after the end of criminal proceedings as an element implementing the idea of restorative justice. The aim of this study is to present the course of mediation proceedings conducted after the end of the criminal trial. The analysis of the course of the mediation procedure will be carried out on the basis of the provisions of the regulations developed for the implementation of the project entitled: “Pilot of the program implementing the idea of restorative justice in the District Inspectorate of Prison Service in Lublin”. The article is divided into nine parts. The first part is an introduction to the considerations on the idea of restorative justice allowing for reconciliation between the inmate and the victim of the crime. The next part is devoted to international regulations, which constitute the basis for the use of mediation at the stage following the end of criminal proceedings. Parts from three to eight contain an overview of the course and organization of the mediation procedure based on the provisions of the regulations developed for the implementation of the Pilot Project, from the moment of its initiation to its completion. The last part summarizes the analysis performed. The considerations presented in the article lead to the conclusion that the lack of regulations in generally applicable acts of law does not constitute an obstacle to the use of post-conviction mediation as a method enabling the implementation of the idea of restorative justice and giving the possibility of reconciliation between the perpetrator of the prohibited act and the victim of the crime.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据组织规则进行调解程序,并在行政诉讼阶段进行庭外调解
调解作为一种可供选择的纠纷解决方法,在社会生活的各个领域越来越受欢迎。目前规范与服刑有关问题的具有约束力的法律法规中没有关于使用调解作为友好解决争端的方法的规定,从而使法院裁定判处监禁的被禁止行为的肇事者与犯罪受害者之间有可能和解。因此,应当澄清的是,缺乏所示范围内的规定是否妨碍在刑事诉讼结束后将调解作为实施恢复性司法理念的一个要素。本研究的目的是介绍刑事审判结束后进行的调解程序的过程。将根据为执行题为“卢布林地区监狱管理局实施恢复性司法理念方案试点”的项目而制定的条例的规定,对调解程序的过程进行分析。这篇文章分为九个部分。第一部分介绍了对恢复性司法理念的思考,即允许罪犯和受害者之间和解。下一部分专门讨论国际条例,这些条例构成在刑事诉讼结束后阶段使用调解的基础。第三至第八部分概述了根据为实施试点项目制定的条例的规定,从启动到完成调解程序的过程和组织。最后一部分总结了所进行的分析。该条中提出的考虑导致得出的结论是,在普遍适用的法律行为中缺乏规定,并不妨碍将定罪后调解作为一种能够实施恢复性司法理念的方法,并使被禁止行为的实施者和犯罪受害者之间有可能和解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The relationship between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and criminal behavior: a psychological profile of convicts serving custodial sentences. Pilot studies Basics of improving special protection for convicted persons – critical remarks Firmant and the problem of identifying a taxpayer in an organized criminal group Criminal law protection of religious freedom amid contemporary challenges and threats Forfission of an enterprise and the burd of proof in criminal process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1