Customs Valuation in the European Union: Back to the Fifties Thanks to the Court of Justice of the European Union

IF 0.2 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Trade and Customs Journal Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.54648/gtcj2022059
D. Rovetta
{"title":"Customs Valuation in the European Union: Back to the Fifties Thanks to the Court of Justice of the European Union","authors":"D. Rovetta","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Fawkes Kft. case caused a clash between the EU customs valuation system and the international obligations of the EU under World Trade Organization (WTO) law. By allowing the systemic disregard by the customs authorities of the sequential customs valuation methods set forth both by EU law and by the WTO Customs Valuation Agreement in favour of the use of national databases of the customs authorities, this judgment also jeopardizes the uniformity in the application of customs law in the European Union. One wonders here what the judicia policy, if any, by the Court of Justice of the European Union behind such judgment is. Maybe it is time that all customs law cases are assigned to the same Chamber of the Court so to de facto establish a specialized chamber dealing with customs law matters. At the end of the day, the Customs Union is the main pillar of the whole EU foundation and would deserve an appropriate treatment also by the EU top judicial body.","PeriodicalId":12728,"journal":{"name":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2022059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Fawkes Kft. case caused a clash between the EU customs valuation system and the international obligations of the EU under World Trade Organization (WTO) law. By allowing the systemic disregard by the customs authorities of the sequential customs valuation methods set forth both by EU law and by the WTO Customs Valuation Agreement in favour of the use of national databases of the customs authorities, this judgment also jeopardizes the uniformity in the application of customs law in the European Union. One wonders here what the judicia policy, if any, by the Court of Justice of the European Union behind such judgment is. Maybe it is time that all customs law cases are assigned to the same Chamber of the Court so to de facto establish a specialized chamber dealing with customs law matters. At the end of the day, the Customs Union is the main pillar of the whole EU foundation and would deserve an appropriate treatment also by the EU top judicial body.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟海关估价:回到五十年代多亏了欧盟法院
欧洲联盟法院在福克斯法院的判决。该案引起了欧盟海关估价体系和世界贸易组织(WTO)法律规定的欧盟国际义务之间的冲突。这一判决允许海关当局系统性地无视欧盟法律和世贸组织《海关估价协定》规定的顺序海关估价方法,支持使用海关当局的国家数据库,这也危及欧盟海关法适用的统一性。在这里,人们想知道欧盟法院在这一判决背后的司法政策是什么(如果有的话)。也许是时候将所有海关法案件分配给法院的同一分庭了,以便事实上建立一个处理海关法事务的专门分庭。归根结底,关税同盟是整个欧盟基础的主要支柱,也应该得到欧盟最高司法机构的适当对待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Trade and Customs Journal
Global Trade and Customs Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
The EU 11th and 12th Packages of Sanctions Against Russia: How Far is the EU Willing to Go Extraterritorially? Special Procedures the Responsible Person(s): What Would Change under the EU Commission’s Reform Proposal? Positioning African Maritime Services as Key Enablers of the Emerging Single African Market Responding to the EU Green Deal: A Proactive Approach to Trade and Green Industrial Policy in Africa Navigating Digital Sovereignty: Implications for African Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1