Comparison of fractionated versus bolus dose of bupivacaine heavy (0.5%) in spinal anesthesia for elective caesarean section—A prospective, randomized, single blind, and clinical trial

Darshna Patel, Chintan Patel
{"title":"Comparison of fractionated versus bolus dose of bupivacaine heavy (0.5%) in spinal anesthesia for elective caesarean section—A prospective, randomized, single blind, and clinical trial","authors":"Darshna Patel, Chintan Patel","doi":"10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_68_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Spinal anesthesia using bolus dose of bupivacaine has rapid onset of action but it may precipitate hypotension, whereas fractionated dose will provide hemodynamic stability as well as prolong the duration of analgesia. Aims: We aimed to compare the hemodynamic stability as our primary objective and block characteristics and duration of effective analgesia as our secondary objectives. Methods: The study was carried out in eighty patients with ASA I or II undergoing elective lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) under spinal anesthesia after institutional ethical clearance. Patients were divided into two groups. Group B patients received spinal anesthesia with single bolus dose of bupivacaine heavy (0.5%) and Group F patients received fractionated dose with two-third of the total dose of bupivacaine heavy (0.5%) given initially followed by one-third dose after 90 seconds. Statistical Analysis Used: Time of onset and regression of sensory and motor blockage, intraoperative hemodynamics, and duration of analgesia were recorded and analyzed using student's t test. Results: Six patients in group F developed hypotension as compared to 16 patients in group B which were statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was statistically highly significant difference in duration of effective analgesia. It was longer for group F (338.25 ± 19.824 minutes), in comparison with group B (266.875 ± 19.861 minutes). Duration of sensory and motor block were also longer in group F as compared to group B (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Fractionated dose of spinal anesthesia provides greater stability in terms of hemodynamic parameters and prolonged duration of analgesia as compared to bolus dose.","PeriodicalId":16611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_68_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Spinal anesthesia using bolus dose of bupivacaine has rapid onset of action but it may precipitate hypotension, whereas fractionated dose will provide hemodynamic stability as well as prolong the duration of analgesia. Aims: We aimed to compare the hemodynamic stability as our primary objective and block characteristics and duration of effective analgesia as our secondary objectives. Methods: The study was carried out in eighty patients with ASA I or II undergoing elective lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) under spinal anesthesia after institutional ethical clearance. Patients were divided into two groups. Group B patients received spinal anesthesia with single bolus dose of bupivacaine heavy (0.5%) and Group F patients received fractionated dose with two-third of the total dose of bupivacaine heavy (0.5%) given initially followed by one-third dose after 90 seconds. Statistical Analysis Used: Time of onset and regression of sensory and motor blockage, intraoperative hemodynamics, and duration of analgesia were recorded and analyzed using student's t test. Results: Six patients in group F developed hypotension as compared to 16 patients in group B which were statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was statistically highly significant difference in duration of effective analgesia. It was longer for group F (338.25 ± 19.824 minutes), in comparison with group B (266.875 ± 19.861 minutes). Duration of sensory and motor block were also longer in group F as compared to group B (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Fractionated dose of spinal anesthesia provides greater stability in terms of hemodynamic parameters and prolonged duration of analgesia as compared to bolus dose.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择性剖宫产脊麻分次给药与单次给药剂量(0.5%)布比卡因的比较——一项前瞻性、随机、单盲和临床试验
背景:使用单次剂量布比卡因的脊髓麻醉起效快,但可能会引发低血压,而分次剂量将提供血液动力学稳定性并延长镇痛持续时间。目的:我们的主要目标是比较血流动力学稳定性,次要目标是阻断特征和有效镇痛持续时间。方法:对80例ASA I或II患者在机构伦理审查后,在脊髓麻醉下进行选择性下段剖腹产(LSCS)的研究。患者被分为两组。B组患者接受单次大剂量(0.5%)的布比卡因重磅脊麻,F组患者接受分次剂量,最初给予总剂量的三分之二(0.5%),90秒后给予三分之一剂量。使用的统计分析:使用学生t检验记录和分析感觉和运动障碍的发作时间和消退、术中血液动力学和镇痛持续时间。结果:F组有6例低血压,B组有16例低血压,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。与B组(266.875±19.861分钟)相比,F组的时间更长(338.25±19.824分钟)。与B组相比,F组的感觉和运动阻滞持续时间也更长(p<0.0001)。结论:与推注剂量相比,分段剂量的脊麻在血液动力学参数和镇痛持续时间方面提供了更大的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
To study maternal hypotension, side-effects and fetal acid-base balance during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia using prophylactic infusion doses of 25 and 50 μg/Min phenylephrine Takotsubo cardiomyopathy in pregnancy: A focused review Comparative evaluation of two doses of phenylephrine infusion to prevent intra-operative nausea and vomiting during elective obstetric spinal anesthesia Carbetocin: Are we ready for a paradigm shift? Evaluation of perfusion index as a screening tool for prediction of hypotension and shivering in cesarean section
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1