“Chinese, Yet Not Chinese”: Creolized Babas, China-Born Chinese, and Their Changing Relationships in Singapore after 1870s

IF 0.4 Q4 ETHNIC STUDIES Journal of Chinese Overseas Pub Date : 2023-04-17 DOI:10.1163/17932548-12341480
Soon Keong Ong (王纯强)
{"title":"“Chinese, Yet Not Chinese”: Creolized Babas, China-Born Chinese, and Their Changing Relationships in Singapore after 1870s","authors":"Soon Keong Ong (王纯强)","doi":"10.1163/17932548-12341480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article examines the factors behind the changing relationships between Chinese born in Singapore, i.e. the so-called Babas, and Chinese born in China from the late nineteenth century to the early 1930s. It observes that while their interactions were congenial and interdependent in the nineteenth century, they became increasingly contentious and antagonistic into the early twentieth century. Because the Babas had settled outside China and created a creolized culture through localization and Westernization, their supposed straying from Chinese culture and distancing from China were used by scholars and the Chinese themselves to explain the growing gulf between the Babas and the China-born. But as this article argues, in the period under study, the tension and animosity between the two Chinese communities ran deeper than mere cultural differences, as they were aggravated by social changes, economic competitions, and divergent political allegiances.","PeriodicalId":51941,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Overseas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Overseas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/17932548-12341480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the factors behind the changing relationships between Chinese born in Singapore, i.e. the so-called Babas, and Chinese born in China from the late nineteenth century to the early 1930s. It observes that while their interactions were congenial and interdependent in the nineteenth century, they became increasingly contentious and antagonistic into the early twentieth century. Because the Babas had settled outside China and created a creolized culture through localization and Westernization, their supposed straying from Chinese culture and distancing from China were used by scholars and the Chinese themselves to explain the growing gulf between the Babas and the China-born. But as this article argues, in the period under study, the tension and animosity between the two Chinese communities ran deeper than mere cultural differences, as they were aggravated by social changes, economic competitions, and divergent political allegiances.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“中国人,但又不是中国人”:19世纪70年代后,克里奥尔化的巴巴,中国出生的华人,以及他们在新加坡不断变化的关系
本文考察了19世纪末至30年代初在新加坡出生的华人(即所谓的“爸爸”)与在中国出生的华人之间关系变化的背后因素。报告指出,尽管他们的互动在19世纪是投缘和相互依存的,但在20世纪初,他们变得越来越有争议和对立。由于巴巴人在中国境外定居,并通过本土化和西化创造了一种克里奥尔化的文化,他们所谓的偏离中国文化和远离中国的说法被学者和中国人自己用来解释巴巴人和中国出生的人之间日益扩大的鸿沟。但正如本文所说,在所研究的时期,两个华人社区之间的紧张和敌意不仅仅是文化差异,因为社会变化、经济竞争和不同的政治忠诚加剧了这种差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chinese Overseas
Journal of Chinese Overseas ETHNIC STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
33.30%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Anti-Asian Hate in the United States during the COVID-19 Pandemic A ‘New Normal’ or Returning to the ‘Old Normal’: Deteriorating US–China Relations, Chinese Americans, and the Future “Thanks for Getting Me in Touch with Local Politicians!” Book News The Local and Global Scope of The Year of the Ox
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1