Preoperative multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging: a safe clinical practice to reduce incidental prostate cancer in Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate

A. Porreca, M. Giampaoli, L. Bianchi, D. D'agostino, D. Romagnoli, F. Bianchi, A. D. Rosso, P. Corsi, R. Schiavina*, W. Artibani, E. Brunocilla
{"title":"Preoperative multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging: a safe clinical practice to reduce incidental prostate cancer in Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate","authors":"A. Porreca, M. Giampaoli, L. Bianchi, D. D'agostino, D. Romagnoli, F. Bianchi, A. D. Rosso, P. Corsi, R. Schiavina*, W. Artibani, E. Brunocilla","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2019.1943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Purpose of the study was to investigate the correlation of a preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate (mpMRI) in patients with a suspicion of prostate cancer and eligible for Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP). Material and methods Data of 228 patients who had undergone HoLEP was selected and retrospectively analyzed from a multicentric database. All patients presented with a raised serum PSA and/or an abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE). Prostate cancer (PCa) was excluded either with a negative mpMRI (group ‘NEGATIVE MRI’ n = 113) or a standard biopsy (group ‘NO MRI’ n = 115). Preoperative characteristic surgical and histological outcomes were confronted. A univariate and multivariate logistic regression model was performed to investigate independent predictors of incidental Prostate Cancer (iPCa). Results Both groups presented with no statistical differences in preoperative characteristics besides previous acute urinary retention rates and post-voided residual volume, found to be higher (27.8% vs. 14.2% and median 120cc vs. 80cc) in NO MRI and NEGATIVE MRI respectively. No differences were registered in surgical time, removed tissue, catheterization time, hospital stay and complications rate. Statistically lower rate of iPCa (p = 0.03) was detected in the NEGATIVE MRI group (6.2%) in comparison with NO MRI group (14.8%). In multivariate logistic regression only presence of a preoperative negative mpMRI correlated (p = 0.04) as an independent predictive factor (OR 2.63; 95% CI: 1.02–6.75). Conclusions A negative mpMRI might be a useful tool to be included in a novel preoperative assessment to patients eligible for HoLEP with a suspicion of PCa in order to avoid an incidental PCa.","PeriodicalId":86295,"journal":{"name":"Urologia polska","volume":"72 1","pages":"106 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2019.1943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Introduction Purpose of the study was to investigate the correlation of a preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate (mpMRI) in patients with a suspicion of prostate cancer and eligible for Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP). Material and methods Data of 228 patients who had undergone HoLEP was selected and retrospectively analyzed from a multicentric database. All patients presented with a raised serum PSA and/or an abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE). Prostate cancer (PCa) was excluded either with a negative mpMRI (group ‘NEGATIVE MRI’ n = 113) or a standard biopsy (group ‘NO MRI’ n = 115). Preoperative characteristic surgical and histological outcomes were confronted. A univariate and multivariate logistic regression model was performed to investigate independent predictors of incidental Prostate Cancer (iPCa). Results Both groups presented with no statistical differences in preoperative characteristics besides previous acute urinary retention rates and post-voided residual volume, found to be higher (27.8% vs. 14.2% and median 120cc vs. 80cc) in NO MRI and NEGATIVE MRI respectively. No differences were registered in surgical time, removed tissue, catheterization time, hospital stay and complications rate. Statistically lower rate of iPCa (p = 0.03) was detected in the NEGATIVE MRI group (6.2%) in comparison with NO MRI group (14.8%). In multivariate logistic regression only presence of a preoperative negative mpMRI correlated (p = 0.04) as an independent predictive factor (OR 2.63; 95% CI: 1.02–6.75). Conclusions A negative mpMRI might be a useful tool to be included in a novel preoperative assessment to patients eligible for HoLEP with a suspicion of PCa in order to avoid an incidental PCa.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术前多参数前列腺磁共振成像:钬激光前列腺摘除术中减少附带前列腺癌症的安全临床实践
引言本研究的目的是研究术前多参数前列腺磁共振成像(mpMRI)与怀疑患有前列腺癌症并符合钬激光前列腺摘除术(HoLEP)条件的患者的相关性。材料和方法从多中心数据库中选择228例接受HoLEP的患者进行回顾性分析。所有患者均出现血清PSA升高和/或直肠指检(DRE)异常。前列腺癌症(PCa)被排除在mpMRI阴性(“阴性MRI”组n=113)或标准活检(“无MRI”组n=115)之外。术前特征性的手术和组织学结果。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型研究偶发性癌症(iPCa)的独立预测因素。结果除既往急性尿潴留率和排尿后残余容量外,两组患者术前特征无统计学差异,no MRI和阴性MRI分别为27.8%和14.2%,中位数为120cc和80cc。手术时间、切除组织、导管插入术时间、住院时间和并发症发生率无差异。与无MRI组(14.8%)相比,阴性MRI组(6.2%)的iPCa发生率(p=0.03)在统计学上较低。在多变量逻辑回归中,只有术前阴性mpMRI的存在作为独立预测因素相关(p=0.04)(OR 2.63;95%CI:1.02–6.75)。结论阴性mpMRI可能是一种有用的工具,可用于新的术前对有PCa嫌疑的符合HoLEP条件的患者进行评估,以避免偶然发生PCa。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Choosing a path for CEJU Location of ureteral access sheath in the ureter. Does it affect the fluid flow in different calyces? A new era and future of education: the impact of pandemic on online learning - a study from the European School of Urology. Spermatic vein thrombosis as a rare cause of testicular pain - review of the literature. Surgical outcomes of low-power thulium laser enucleation of prostates >80 g. One-year of follow-up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1