Serum procalcitonin in pregnancy-associated sepsis: A case control study

IF 0.4 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2019-08-27 DOI:10.7196/sajog.1397
R. Agarwal, P. Priyadarshini, M. Mehndiratta
{"title":"Serum procalcitonin in pregnancy-associated sepsis: A case control study","authors":"R. Agarwal, P. Priyadarshini, M. Mehndiratta","doi":"10.7196/sajog.1397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Procalcitonin (PCT) is an established marker for sepsis, particularly bacterial, but its use in diagnosing pregnancy-associated sepsis (PAS) is relatively unexplored.  Objective. To investigate whether PCT could be used for the diagnosis of PAS in our study population, and what the appropriate values might be for the diagnosis.  Methods. The study included 40 pregnant, post-abortal and postpartum women with PAS, identified using systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria. Patients with hypertensive disorders, premature rupture of membranes, severe trauma, liver cirrhosis and lung or thyroid malignancies were excluded. Forty healthy term pregnant women with sterile urine cultures were taken as controls. PCT levels were obtained at admission and statistically compared between the groups. Severity and culture positivity in PAS were also assessed.  Results. Severe PAS was present in 30 patients. Overall culture positivity was seen in 55% ( n =22) of subjects. Culture-positive patients had higher PCT levels (3.03 μg/L) compared with the culture-negative (1.77 μ/L), though this did not reach statistical significance ( p =0.235). Mean (standard deviation) PCT in PAS patients was 2.46 (0.56) μ/L, while in healthy controls it was 0.091 (0.019) μg/L. This difference was statistically significant ( p 0.125 μg/L is suggested as the critical level for PAS diagnosis in appropriate clinical settings. Additionally, mean PCT levels differed significantly in severe v. non-severe PAS.","PeriodicalId":49579,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7196/sajog.1397","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/sajog.1397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background. Procalcitonin (PCT) is an established marker for sepsis, particularly bacterial, but its use in diagnosing pregnancy-associated sepsis (PAS) is relatively unexplored.  Objective. To investigate whether PCT could be used for the diagnosis of PAS in our study population, and what the appropriate values might be for the diagnosis.  Methods. The study included 40 pregnant, post-abortal and postpartum women with PAS, identified using systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria. Patients with hypertensive disorders, premature rupture of membranes, severe trauma, liver cirrhosis and lung or thyroid malignancies were excluded. Forty healthy term pregnant women with sterile urine cultures were taken as controls. PCT levels were obtained at admission and statistically compared between the groups. Severity and culture positivity in PAS were also assessed.  Results. Severe PAS was present in 30 patients. Overall culture positivity was seen in 55% ( n =22) of subjects. Culture-positive patients had higher PCT levels (3.03 μg/L) compared with the culture-negative (1.77 μ/L), though this did not reach statistical significance ( p =0.235). Mean (standard deviation) PCT in PAS patients was 2.46 (0.56) μ/L, while in healthy controls it was 0.091 (0.019) μg/L. This difference was statistically significant ( p 0.125 μg/L is suggested as the critical level for PAS diagnosis in appropriate clinical settings. Additionally, mean PCT levels differed significantly in severe v. non-severe PAS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠相关性败血症患者血清降钙素原的病例对照研究
背景降钙素原(PCT)是一种已确定的败血症,特别是细菌性败血症的标志物,但其在诊断妊娠相关败血症(PAS)中的应用相对未被探索。目标。研究PCT是否可用于我们研究人群中PAS的诊断,以及诊断的合适值。方法。该研究纳入了40名患有PAS的孕妇、流产后和产后妇女,采用全身炎症反应综合征标准进行鉴定。排除患有高血压疾病、胎膜早破、严重创伤、肝硬化和肺部或甲状腺恶性肿瘤的患者。40名健康足月孕妇接受无菌尿液培养作为对照。PCT水平在入院时获得,并在两组之间进行统计学比较。PAS的严重程度和培养阳性率也进行了评估。结果。30例患者出现严重PAS。55%(n=22)的受试者总体文化阳性。培养物阳性患者的PCT水平(3.03μg/L)高于培养物阴性患者(1.77μg/L),但没有达到统计学意义(p=0.235)。PAS患者的平均(标准差)PCT为2.46(0.56)μ/L,而健康对照组为0.091(0.019)μg/L。这种差异具有统计学意义(在适当的临床环境中,0.125μg/L被认为是PAS诊断的临界水平。此外,严重PAS与非严重PAS的平均PCT水平差异显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The SAJOG is a tri-annual, general specialist obstetrics and gynaecology journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. The journal carries original research articles, editorials, clinical practice, personal opinion, South Africa health-related news, obituaries and general correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Does adding coenzyme Q10 to dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate positively impact fertility outcomes in young, poor responder infertile women undergoing antagonist protocol for IVF/ICSI cycles? Prevalence and severity of depression and anxiety in infertile female patients attending an academic hospital in central South Africa Is medicine a process of scientific rigour? How to care for fetuses with prenatally diagnosed severe abnormalities Prevalence of and sociodemographic factors associated with antenatal depression among women in Limpopo Province, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1