Evaluation of Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block With 20 mL of 0.5% Ropivacaine in Patients Undergoing Knee Surgeries-A Randomized Control Trial.

Pavithra Arumugam, Saravanan Ravi, Sundaram. Ln, Prasanna Manickam, Karthik Kanthan
{"title":"Evaluation of Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block With 20 mL of 0.5% Ropivacaine in Patients Undergoing Knee Surgeries-A Randomized Control Trial.","authors":"Pavithra Arumugam, Saravanan Ravi, Sundaram. Ln, Prasanna Manickam, Karthik Kanthan","doi":"10.6859/aja.202208/PP.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nAdductor canal block (ACB) is a motor sparing block providing analgesia for surgeries involving anterior part of the knee. The aim of our study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ACB to reduce pain in arthroscopic knee surgeries done under spinal anesthesia. Our primary objective was to evaluate the 24 hours postoperative morphine consumption. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest and during knee flexion, hemodynamics and side effects of the block.\n\n\nMETHODS\nIn this prospective randomised controlled trial, 70 patients who underwent arthroscopic knee surgeries were randomly divided into two groups, A and C. Surgeries were done under spinal anesthesia. Group A patients received ACB with 20 mL of 0.5 % ropivacaine using ultrasound postoperatively. Block was not performed in group C. The amount of morphine consumption in PCA pump, duration of analgesia, mean VAS scores at rest and flexion, hemodynamics and adverse effects were monitored.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe average morphine consumption was significantly lesser with a P-value < 0.001 in group A (8.628 ± 2.001 mg) when compared to group C (21.914 ± 5.118 mg). The duration of analgesia was longer in group A (365.71 ± 53.648 min vs. 150.429 ± 22.537 min) with highly significant P-value of < 0.001. Group A patients had significantly decreased VAS scores at rest and knee flexion and better haemodynamic stability.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nWe conclude that ultrasound-guided ACB resulted in significantly lesser morphine consumption after arthroscopic knee surgeries. ACB prolonged the duration of analgesia with better hemodynamics, lesser VAS pain scores and with no complications.","PeriodicalId":8482,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6859/aja.202208/PP.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND Adductor canal block (ACB) is a motor sparing block providing analgesia for surgeries involving anterior part of the knee. The aim of our study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ACB to reduce pain in arthroscopic knee surgeries done under spinal anesthesia. Our primary objective was to evaluate the 24 hours postoperative morphine consumption. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest and during knee flexion, hemodynamics and side effects of the block. METHODS In this prospective randomised controlled trial, 70 patients who underwent arthroscopic knee surgeries were randomly divided into two groups, A and C. Surgeries were done under spinal anesthesia. Group A patients received ACB with 20 mL of 0.5 % ropivacaine using ultrasound postoperatively. Block was not performed in group C. The amount of morphine consumption in PCA pump, duration of analgesia, mean VAS scores at rest and flexion, hemodynamics and adverse effects were monitored. RESULTS The average morphine consumption was significantly lesser with a P-value < 0.001 in group A (8.628 ± 2.001 mg) when compared to group C (21.914 ± 5.118 mg). The duration of analgesia was longer in group A (365.71 ± 53.648 min vs. 150.429 ± 22.537 min) with highly significant P-value of < 0.001. Group A patients had significantly decreased VAS scores at rest and knee flexion and better haemodynamic stability. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that ultrasound-guided ACB resulted in significantly lesser morphine consumption after arthroscopic knee surgeries. ACB prolonged the duration of analgesia with better hemodynamics, lesser VAS pain scores and with no complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下20ml 0.5%罗哌卡因内收管阻滞对膝关节手术患者镇痛效果的评价——随机对照试验。
背景加导管阻滞(ACB)是一种为涉及膝关节前部的手术提供镇痛的保留运动的阻滞。我们研究的目的是评估ACB在脊柱麻醉下关节镜膝关节手术中减轻疼痛的镇痛效果。我们的主要目的是评估术后24小时的吗啡消耗量。次要目标是评估静息和膝关节屈曲时的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、血流动力学和阻滞的副作用。方法在这项前瞻性随机对照试验中,70名接受膝关节镜手术的患者被随机分为两组,A组和C组。手术在脊柱麻醉下进行。A组患者术后接受ACB加0.5%罗哌卡因20mL超声检查。C组未进行阻滞。监测PCA泵中吗啡的消耗量、镇痛持续时间、静息和屈曲时的平均VAS评分、血液动力学和不良反应。结果与C组(21.914±5.118mg)相比,a组(8.628±2.001mg)的平均吗啡消耗量显著减少,P值<0.001。A组镇痛持续时间较长(365.71±53.648分钟vs.150.429±22.537分钟),P值<0.001。A组患者在休息和膝关节屈曲时VAS评分显著降低,血流动力学稳定性较好。结论超声引导下ACB可显著减少膝关节镜手术后吗啡的消耗。ACB延长了镇痛时间,血流动力学更好,VAS疼痛评分更低,无并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian journal of anesthesiology
Asian journal of anesthesiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Anesthesiology (AJA), launched in 1962, is the official and peer-reviewed publication of the Taiwan Society of Anaesthesiologists. It is published quarterly (March/June/September/December) by Airiti and indexed in EMBASE, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, SIIC Data Bases. AJA accepts submissions from around the world. AJA is the premier open access journal in the field of anaesthesia and its related disciplines of critical care and pain in Asia. The number of Chinese anaesthesiologists has reached more than 60,000 and is still growing. The journal aims to disseminate anaesthesiology research and services for the Chinese community and is now the main anaesthesiology journal for Chinese societies located in Taiwan, Mainland China, Hong Kong and Singapore. AJAcaters to clinicians of all relevant specialties and biomedical scientists working in the areas of anesthesia, critical care medicine and pain management, as well as other related fields (pharmacology, pathology molecular biology, etc). AJA''s editorial team is composed of local and regional experts in the field as well as many leading international experts. Article types accepted include review articles, research papers, short communication, correspondence and images.
期刊最新文献
Four Approaches of Styletubation for Handling the Orotracheal Intubation: A Technical Tip. Risk of Dementia After Uterus or Prostate Resection: 17-Year Follow-Up of a Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study. Comparison of Inter-Incisor Distance as a Predictor of Difficult Intubation in Men and Women-A Prospective Observational Study. Deteriorating Hypotension and Trepopnea During Left Lateral Decubitus Position Before Spinal Anesthesia. Practice Algorithm of Rotational Thromboelastometry-Guided (ROTEM-Guided) Bleeding Management in Liver Transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1