Policy, office, votes – and integrity. The British Conservative Party, Brexit, and immigration

IF 2.8 1区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies Pub Date : 2021-02-09 DOI:10.1080/1369183X.2020.1853909
Tim Bale
{"title":"Policy, office, votes – and integrity. The British Conservative Party, Brexit, and immigration","authors":"Tim Bale","doi":"10.1080/1369183X.2020.1853909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT While Europe’s so-called migration crisis is of fairly recent origin, some of the continent’s centre-right parties have been successfully politicising immigration for at least half a century. But that success and that politicisation can come at a heavy price – for the country, for the party, and for those who lead it or want to lead it. With both incumbents and challengers doing their best (and doing a great deal) to determine the party line on the issue, politicisation of immigration for electoral and personal advantage can make for incoherent, even counterproductive public policy. It can also tempt the leaders, both actual and aspirant, of centre-right parties into making promises to restrict immigration which are impossible to keep, thereby raising the salience of the issue and threatening their ownership of it. Attempts to hold on to, or to regain, ownership can, along with intra-party competition, create a vicious cycle, driving policy in an ever more unrealistic direction and creating not only serious internal instability but immense external costs. The Conservative Party’s experience is a case in point.","PeriodicalId":48371,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies","volume":"48 1","pages":"482 - 501"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1853909","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1853909","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT While Europe’s so-called migration crisis is of fairly recent origin, some of the continent’s centre-right parties have been successfully politicising immigration for at least half a century. But that success and that politicisation can come at a heavy price – for the country, for the party, and for those who lead it or want to lead it. With both incumbents and challengers doing their best (and doing a great deal) to determine the party line on the issue, politicisation of immigration for electoral and personal advantage can make for incoherent, even counterproductive public policy. It can also tempt the leaders, both actual and aspirant, of centre-right parties into making promises to restrict immigration which are impossible to keep, thereby raising the salience of the issue and threatening their ownership of it. Attempts to hold on to, or to regain, ownership can, along with intra-party competition, create a vicious cycle, driving policy in an ever more unrealistic direction and creating not only serious internal instability but immense external costs. The Conservative Party’s experience is a case in point.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政策、职位、投票和诚信。英国保守党、英国脱欧和移民
摘要尽管欧洲所谓的移民危机起源于最近,但欧洲大陆的一些中右翼政党已经成功地将移民政治化了至少半个世纪。但这种成功和政治化可能会付出沉重的代价——对国家、对政党、对领导或想领导它的人来说。现任者和挑战者都在尽最大努力(并做了大量工作)来确定政党在这个问题上的路线,为了选举和个人利益而将移民政治化可能导致不连贯,甚至是适得其反的公共政策。这也可能诱使中右翼政党的领导人,无论是实际的还是有抱负的,做出限制移民的承诺,而这些承诺是不可能兑现的,从而提高了这个问题的重要性,并威胁到他们对这个问题的所有权。试图保留或重新获得所有权,加上党内竞争,可能会造成恶性循环,将政策推向越来越不切实际的方向,不仅造成严重的内部不稳定,而且造成巨大的外部成本。保守党的经验就是一个很好的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies (JEMS) publishes the results of first-class research on all forms of migration and its consequences, together with articles on ethnic conflict, discrimination, racism, nationalism, citizenship and policies of integration. Contributions to the journal, which are all fully refereed, are especially welcome when they are the result of original empirical research that makes a clear contribution to the field of migration JEMS has a long-standing interest in informed policy debate and contributions are welcomed which seek to develop the implications of research for policy innovation, or which evaluate the results of previous initiatives. The journal is also interested in publishing the results of theoretical work.
期刊最新文献
Same, same but different? A Discourse Network Analysis of the EU's framings of refugee arrivals in 2015 and 2022. 'As if the soul returns to the body': affect, stuckedness, and (in)voluntary return to Nicaragua from Spain. Making (in)formality work in a multi-scalar European border regime. Playing dirty: the shady governance and reproduction of migrant illegality. Noninvasive Biomarkers for Alcohol-Related Liver Disease-A Proteomic Related Preliminary Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1