‘Not Too Good to be True’: A Proposal to Further Benefit from Emergence in Management Research

IF 1.1 Q4 MANAGEMENT Management Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI:10.37725/mgmt.2023.9390
Anouck Adrot
{"title":"‘Not Too Good to be True’: A Proposal to Further Benefit from Emergence in Management Research","authors":"Anouck Adrot","doi":"10.37725/mgmt.2023.9390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emergence is inherent to organizational life and design. Throughout the 20th and 21st centuries, emergence has been appraised as a conceptual avenue that surpassed the limitations of traditional thinking and epistemology. In this essay, I suggest that, despite its relevance and popularity among management scholars, emergence has remained underused. I rely on Kuhn’s view (1962) to better understand the reasons for this paradox and propose some practical avenues to improve our understanding and use of the concept. This essay has three objectives: (1) to demonstrate that emergence is relevant to better understanding organizations; (2) to explain why emergence remains underused in management and organization theory (MOT); and (3) to propose practical guidelines to further rely on the concept of emergence.","PeriodicalId":47182,"journal":{"name":"Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37725/mgmt.2023.9390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emergence is inherent to organizational life and design. Throughout the 20th and 21st centuries, emergence has been appraised as a conceptual avenue that surpassed the limitations of traditional thinking and epistemology. In this essay, I suggest that, despite its relevance and popularity among management scholars, emergence has remained underused. I rely on Kuhn’s view (1962) to better understand the reasons for this paradox and propose some practical avenues to improve our understanding and use of the concept. This essay has three objectives: (1) to demonstrate that emergence is relevant to better understanding organizations; (2) to explain why emergence remains underused in management and organization theory (MOT); and (3) to propose practical guidelines to further rely on the concept of emergence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“不太好而不真实”:从管理研究的涌现中进一步获益的建议
紧急状态是组织生活和设计中固有的。在整个20世纪和21世纪,涌现被认为是一种超越传统思维和认识论局限的概念途径。在这篇文章中,我认为,尽管它在管理学者中具有相关性和受欢迎程度,但它仍然没有得到充分利用。我依靠库恩的观点(1962)来更好地理解这种悖论的原因,并提出一些切实可行的途径来提高我们对这一概念的理解和使用。本文有三个目的:(1)证明涌现与更好地理解组织有关;(2) 解释为什么涌现在管理和组织理论中仍然没有得到充分利用;以及(3)提出切实可行的指导方针,以进一步依靠涌现的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Management
Management MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
70 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal deals with pressing problems, not only of general nature, but especially with those occurring in the countries in transition. In fact, it aims to cover functional issues, specific topics and general aspects of management related to all kinds of organizations – manufacturing and service companies, profit-making firms and non-profit organizations, private and public, as well as large and small enterprises.
期刊最新文献
TRANSFORMATIVE INNOVATIONS, VIRTUAL EXCHANGE, AND COLLABORATIVE LEADERSHIP: RESHAPING HIGHER EDUCATION FOR THE GLOBAL DIGITAL WORLD WEB 4.0 COMPONENTS OF SERVICE-DOMINANT LOGIC IN B2B MARKETING FINANCIAL CHALLENGES OF TRANSFORMATION PERIOD ECONOMIC AGENTS: LESSONS FROM PRACTICE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES ZARZĄDZANIE ZESPOŁEM – AKTUALNE WYZWANIA DLA MENEDŻERA W WARUNKACH KRYZYSOWYCH
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1