Use of Groin Neurectomies for Noniatrogenic Testicular and Groin Pain

Sanchit Sachdeva, A. Chhabra, J. Reisch, S. Rozen
{"title":"Use of Groin Neurectomies for Noniatrogenic Testicular and Groin Pain","authors":"Sanchit Sachdeva, A. Chhabra, J. Reisch, S. Rozen","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1736421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Chronic groin neuralgia is a life-debilitating condition that plagues patients worldwide. While groin neuralgia is usually traced to iatrogenic causes (inguinal hernia repairs, vasectomy, and hysterectomy), there is a unique subset of patients that present with noniatrogenic groin neuralgia. The diagnosis and treatment of these patients present a particular challenge. Methods A total of 30 patients (current mean age, 46.5 [range: 19–72] years) who presented with noniatrogenic groin neuralgia and received neurectomies on the iliohypogastric, ilioinguinal, and genitofemoral nerves between 2008 and 2017 were identified. A retrospective review of preoperative and immediate postoperative pain scores was compared with prospectively collected current pain on a Likert's scale (0–10). Additionally, patients were asked to complete a Short Form (SF)-20 and identify current pain medications. A two-sided Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test was used to analyze the data. Results Of the 30 patients identified, 16 could participate (mean follow-up = 61 months). The average pain reduction for the entire group was 62.7%. When using an established 30% reduction pain as a marker for clinical significance, 12 successful and 4 unsuccessful patients had an average reduction of 81.1 and 7.68%, respectively (success rate of 75%). Patients with successful group showed a statistically significant increased social functioning (p = 0.012) and near-significant increase in mental health (p = 0.063). Improvements, albeit nonsignificant, in mean scaled scores for every other SF-20 quality of life (QoL) category were observed when comparing both groups. Conclusion Neurectomy is a potentially beneficial surgery that can assuage pain and improve quality of life for patients with noniatrogenic groin neuralgia.","PeriodicalId":34024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery Open","volume":"06 1","pages":"e70 - e78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Chronic groin neuralgia is a life-debilitating condition that plagues patients worldwide. While groin neuralgia is usually traced to iatrogenic causes (inguinal hernia repairs, vasectomy, and hysterectomy), there is a unique subset of patients that present with noniatrogenic groin neuralgia. The diagnosis and treatment of these patients present a particular challenge. Methods A total of 30 patients (current mean age, 46.5 [range: 19–72] years) who presented with noniatrogenic groin neuralgia and received neurectomies on the iliohypogastric, ilioinguinal, and genitofemoral nerves between 2008 and 2017 were identified. A retrospective review of preoperative and immediate postoperative pain scores was compared with prospectively collected current pain on a Likert's scale (0–10). Additionally, patients were asked to complete a Short Form (SF)-20 and identify current pain medications. A two-sided Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test was used to analyze the data. Results Of the 30 patients identified, 16 could participate (mean follow-up = 61 months). The average pain reduction for the entire group was 62.7%. When using an established 30% reduction pain as a marker for clinical significance, 12 successful and 4 unsuccessful patients had an average reduction of 81.1 and 7.68%, respectively (success rate of 75%). Patients with successful group showed a statistically significant increased social functioning (p = 0.012) and near-significant increase in mental health (p = 0.063). Improvements, albeit nonsignificant, in mean scaled scores for every other SF-20 quality of life (QoL) category were observed when comparing both groups. Conclusion Neurectomy is a potentially beneficial surgery that can assuage pain and improve quality of life for patients with noniatrogenic groin neuralgia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Groin切除术治疗非医源性睾丸和Groin疼痛
摘要背景 慢性腹股沟神经痛是困扰世界各地患者的一种使人衰弱的疾病。虽然腹股沟神经痛通常可追溯到医源性原因(腹股沟疝修补术、输精管切除术和子宫切除术),但有一组独特的患者表现为非萎缩性腹股沟神经痛。这些患者的诊断和治疗是一个特殊的挑战。方法 2008年至2017年间,共有30名患者(目前平均年龄46.5[范围:19-72]岁)出现非萎缩性腹股沟神经痛,并接受了髂下腹部、髂腹股沟和生殖器股神经的切除术。对术前和术后即刻疼痛评分的回顾性审查与前瞻性收集的Likert评分表(0-10)上的当前疼痛进行了比较。此外,患者被要求填写一份简短表格(SF)-20,并确定当前的止痛药。采用双侧Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney检验对数据进行分析。后果 在确定的30名患者中,有16名可以参与(平均随访 = 61个月)。整个组的平均疼痛减轻率为62.7%。当使用已确定的30%减轻疼痛作为临床意义的标志时,12名成功和4名不成功的患者的平均疼痛减少率分别为81.1%和7.68%(成功率为75%)。成功组患者的社会功能有统计学意义(p = 0.012),并且心理健康水平几乎显著提高(p = 0.063)。在比较两组时,观察到每隔一个SF-20生活质量(QoL)类别的平均量表得分有所改善,尽管没有显著性。结论 神经切除术是一种潜在的有益手术,可以缓解非萎缩性腹股沟神经痛患者的疼痛,提高生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Synchronous Abdominal Wall and Small Bowel Transplantation: Critical Insights at Four Year Follow Up Stable Arterial Perforators Mapping in Lower Leg Using Color-coded Doppler Sonography, Acoustic Doppler and Thermal Imaging Camera in Patients Undergoing Digital Subtraction Arteriography Conventional and Robot-Assisted Microvascular Anastomosis - Systematic Review Neo-Forearm Functional Reconstruction after Temporary Ectopic Hand Implantation for Salvage of Hand after Extensive Crush Injury to Forearm Combined Application of a Novel Robotic System and Exoscope for Microsurgical Anastomoses: Preclinical Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1