The power and type I error of Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney, Welch's t, and Student's t tests for Likert-type data

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI:10.21449/ijate.1183622
A. Şimşek
{"title":"The power and type I error of Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney, Welch's t, and Student's t tests for Likert-type data","authors":"A. Şimşek","doi":"10.21449/ijate.1183622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Likert-type item is the most popular response format for collecting data in social, educational, and psychological studies through scales or questionnaires. However, there is no consensus on whether parametric or non-parametric tests should be preferred when analyzing Likert-type data. This study examined the statistical power of parametric and non-parametric tests when each Likert-type item was analyzed independently in survey studies. The main purpose of the study is to examine the statistical power of Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney, Welch's t, and Student's t tests for Likert-type data, which are pairwise comparison tests. For this purpose, a Monte Carlo simulation study was conducted. The statistical significance of the selected tests was examined under the conditions of sample size, group size ratio, and effect size. The results showed that the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was superior to its counterparts, especially for small samples and unequal group sizes. However, the Student's t-test for Likert-type data had similar statistical power to the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test under conditions of equal group sizes when the sample size was 200 or more. Consistent with the empirical results, practical recommendations were provided for researchers on what to consider when collecting and analyzing Likert-type data.","PeriodicalId":42417,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1183622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Likert-type item is the most popular response format for collecting data in social, educational, and psychological studies through scales or questionnaires. However, there is no consensus on whether parametric or non-parametric tests should be preferred when analyzing Likert-type data. This study examined the statistical power of parametric and non-parametric tests when each Likert-type item was analyzed independently in survey studies. The main purpose of the study is to examine the statistical power of Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney, Welch's t, and Student's t tests for Likert-type data, which are pairwise comparison tests. For this purpose, a Monte Carlo simulation study was conducted. The statistical significance of the selected tests was examined under the conditions of sample size, group size ratio, and effect size. The results showed that the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was superior to its counterparts, especially for small samples and unequal group sizes. However, the Student's t-test for Likert-type data had similar statistical power to the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test under conditions of equal group sizes when the sample size was 200 or more. Consistent with the empirical results, practical recommendations were provided for researchers on what to consider when collecting and analyzing Likert-type data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Likert型数据的Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney、Welch t和Student t检验的幂和I型误差
Likert型项目是通过量表或问卷收集社会、教育和心理研究数据的最流行的回答形式。然而,在分析Likert型数据时,是否应该首选参数测试或非参数测试,目前还没有达成共识。当在调查研究中独立分析每个Likert类型的项目时,本研究检验了参数和非参数检验的统计能力。本研究的主要目的是检验Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney、Welch t和Student t检验对Likert型数据的统计功效,这是成对比较检验。为此,进行了蒙特卡洛模拟研究。在样本量、组大小比和效应大小的条件下检验所选测试的统计学显著性。结果表明,Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney检验优于同类检验,尤其是在小样本和不相等群体的情况下。然而,当样本量为200或更多时,在相同群体规模的条件下,Likert型数据的Student t检验与Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney检验具有相似的统计能力。与实证结果一致,为研究人员在收集和分析Likert型数据时应考虑的问题提供了切实可行的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
11.10%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
The difference between estimated and perceived item difficulty: An empirical study Current Effect of Mother-Child Memory Talk on Emotion Regulation, Self-Esteem, and Memory Anxiety scale for parents of gifted children (ASPGC): Validity and reliability study Examining the validity and reliability of the academic entitlement scale in Turkish culture The examination of mediating role of distributed leadership in the relationship between school structure and accountability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1