Adoption Competency in a Post–Roe v. Wade Reality

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Social Work Education Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/10437797.2022.2091390
Elissa E. Madden, M. Faulkner, D. Aguiniga
{"title":"Adoption Competency in a Post–Roe v. Wade Reality","authors":"Elissa E. Madden, M. Faulkner, D. Aguiniga","doi":"10.1080/10437797.2022.2091390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As we move into a post–Roe v. Wade reality, it is imperative that social work educators and professionals become proficient in the realities and ethics of adoption. As legal abortion becomes increasingly unavailable in the United States, some anticipate that the number of domestic private adoptions will increase. However, social workers and other social service professionals should understand that adoption is not the simple substitute for abortion that some purport it to be. Rather, it is a complex pregnancy option that has lifelong implications for all members of the adoption triad (i.e., adoptees, birth parents, and adoptive parents). According to the 2007 National Survey of Adoptive Parents, approximately 38% of all adoptions in the United States are private domestic adoptions—the vast majority of which involve infants (Vandivere et al., 2009). Increasingly, adoptees and advocates for adoption have called for reforms to the private adoption industry. Of key importance to this movement is the belief that adoption must exist to meet the needs of children rather than prospective parents who wish to build or expand their families through adoption (National Council for Adoption, 2020; North American Council on Adoptable Children, n.d.). However, in the now infamous leaked Supreme Court opinion, the authors referenced a 2008 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report that referred to the “domestic supply of infants” (“Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization,” 2022, p. 34). There was a social media outcry, as it would seem that many Americans were loath to hear children referred to as economic commodities. Yet domestic private adoption, also referred to as infant adoption, is estimated to be a multibillion-dollar industry (Carroll, 2011). The cost of a typical private infant adoption averages between $20,000 and $45,000 per child (Child Welfare Information Gateway, 2016).","PeriodicalId":17012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work Education","volume":"58 1","pages":"427 - 430"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Work Education","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2022.2091390","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As we move into a post–Roe v. Wade reality, it is imperative that social work educators and professionals become proficient in the realities and ethics of adoption. As legal abortion becomes increasingly unavailable in the United States, some anticipate that the number of domestic private adoptions will increase. However, social workers and other social service professionals should understand that adoption is not the simple substitute for abortion that some purport it to be. Rather, it is a complex pregnancy option that has lifelong implications for all members of the adoption triad (i.e., adoptees, birth parents, and adoptive parents). According to the 2007 National Survey of Adoptive Parents, approximately 38% of all adoptions in the United States are private domestic adoptions—the vast majority of which involve infants (Vandivere et al., 2009). Increasingly, adoptees and advocates for adoption have called for reforms to the private adoption industry. Of key importance to this movement is the belief that adoption must exist to meet the needs of children rather than prospective parents who wish to build or expand their families through adoption (National Council for Adoption, 2020; North American Council on Adoptable Children, n.d.). However, in the now infamous leaked Supreme Court opinion, the authors referenced a 2008 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report that referred to the “domestic supply of infants” (“Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization,” 2022, p. 34). There was a social media outcry, as it would seem that many Americans were loath to hear children referred to as economic commodities. Yet domestic private adoption, also referred to as infant adoption, is estimated to be a multibillion-dollar industry (Carroll, 2011). The cost of a typical private infant adoption averages between $20,000 and $45,000 per child (Child Welfare Information Gateway, 2016).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后罗伊诉韦德案现实中的收养能力
随着我们进入后罗伊诉韦德案的现实,社会工作教育工作者和专业人士必须精通收养的现实和道德。随着合法堕胎在美国越来越不可用,一些人预计国内私人收养的数量将增加。然而,社会工作者和其他社会服务专业人员应该明白,收养并不是一些人所声称的堕胎的简单替代品。相反,它是一种复杂的怀孕选择,对收养黑社会的所有成员(即被收养者、亲生父母和养父母)都有终身影响。根据2007年全国收养父母调查,美国约38%的收养是私人家庭收养,其中绝大多数涉及婴儿(Vandivere等人,2009年)。越来越多的被收养者和收养倡导者呼吁对私人收养行业进行改革。对这场运动至关重要的是,人们相信收养必须满足儿童的需求,而不是希望通过收养来建立或扩大家庭的准父母(国家收养委员会,2020;北美可收养儿童委员会,n.d.)。然而,在现在臭名昭著的泄露的最高法院意见中,作者引用了美国疾病控制与预防中心2008年的一份报告,该报告提到了“婴儿的家庭供应”(“多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织”,2022年,第34页)。社交媒体上出现了强烈抗议,因为许多美国人似乎不愿意听到儿童被称为经济商品。然而,国内私人收养,也被称为婴儿收养,估计是一个价值数十亿美元的行业(Carroll,2011)。一个典型的私人收养婴儿的费用平均在每个孩子20000美元到45000美元之间(儿童福利信息门户,2016)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
15.40%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Work Education is a refereed professional journal concerned with education in social work, and social welfare. Its purpose is to serve as a forum for creative exchange on trends, innovations, and problems relevant to social work education at the undergraduate, masters", and postgraduate levels. JSWE is published three times a year, in winter (January 15), spring/summer (May 15), and fall (September 15). It is available by subscription and is free with CSWE membership.
期刊最新文献
Defending Discomfort: A Critical Social Work Case Against Trigger Warnings Teaching Note—Integrating Disability-Related Content Within the Interprofessional Education Curriculum: Opportunities and Lessons Learned Teaching Note—Antioppressive Pedagogy in Action: The Undergraduate Research Methods Course Considerations for Marginalized Fathers in Human Behavior and the Social Environment (HBSE) Courses: Insights for Social Work Educators and Students Research Note—Making Peer Review Evidence-Based: It’s Time to Open the “Black Box”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1