Platform competition and consumer foresight: The case of airports

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics of Transportation Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecotra.2021.100248
Giuseppe D’Amico
{"title":"Platform competition and consumer foresight: The case of airports","authors":"Giuseppe D’Amico","doi":"10.1016/j.ecotra.2021.100248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper studies the effect of competition and consumer foresight on platform profits. The focus is on airports, which provide passengers with aeronautical and commercial services through airlines and retailers. Our results can be summarized as follows. First, we unravel the relationship between consumer foresight and the optimal pricing of the two services. When passengers are myopic, they undervalue the surplus they derive from the retail services, so that the airport charges low landing fees and makes profits from the retail business. When passengers are foresighted, they better anticipate the surplus from the retail services, so that the airport changes its strategy by charging higher landing fees and boosting competition in the retail sector. Second, we find that the relationship between profits and consumer foresight strictly depends on the considered market structure. When the airport has no competitors, airport profits are non-decreasing in the degree of consumer foresight. By contrast, under duopoly competition, a weakly-negative correlation between airport profits and consumer foresight is observed. These results allow to derive two main managerial implications. First, airport competition can lead to higher landing fees. Second, under competition, an airport is not necessarily interested in informing passengers about its retail facilities. However, an extension where airports decide whether to set an advertising campaign to inform passengers about their retail facilities reveals that they end up locked in a Prisoner’s Dilemma.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45761,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Transportation","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 100248"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212012221000514/pdfft?md5=9410e3dfb1a4167abf034b3bb95f2330&pid=1-s2.0-S2212012221000514-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212012221000514","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper studies the effect of competition and consumer foresight on platform profits. The focus is on airports, which provide passengers with aeronautical and commercial services through airlines and retailers. Our results can be summarized as follows. First, we unravel the relationship between consumer foresight and the optimal pricing of the two services. When passengers are myopic, they undervalue the surplus they derive from the retail services, so that the airport charges low landing fees and makes profits from the retail business. When passengers are foresighted, they better anticipate the surplus from the retail services, so that the airport changes its strategy by charging higher landing fees and boosting competition in the retail sector. Second, we find that the relationship between profits and consumer foresight strictly depends on the considered market structure. When the airport has no competitors, airport profits are non-decreasing in the degree of consumer foresight. By contrast, under duopoly competition, a weakly-negative correlation between airport profits and consumer foresight is observed. These results allow to derive two main managerial implications. First, airport competition can lead to higher landing fees. Second, under competition, an airport is not necessarily interested in informing passengers about its retail facilities. However, an extension where airports decide whether to set an advertising campaign to inform passengers about their retail facilities reveals that they end up locked in a Prisoner’s Dilemma.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平台竞争与消费者前瞻:以机场为例
本文研究了竞争和消费者前瞻对平台利润的影响。重点是机场,机场通过航空公司和零售商为乘客提供航空和商业服务。我们的结果可以总结如下。首先,我们揭示了消费者预见与两种服务的最优定价之间的关系。当乘客目光短浅时,他们低估了他们从零售服务中获得的盈余,因此机场收取较低的着陆费,并从零售业务中获利。当乘客有先见之明时,他们会更好地预测到零售服务的盈余,因此机场会改变策略,收取更高的着陆费,促进零售行业的竞争。其次,我们发现利润与消费者前瞻之间的关系严格依赖于所考虑的市场结构。当机场没有竞争对手时,机场利润在消费者预见性程度上是不减少的。相比之下,在双寡头竞争下,机场利润与消费者前瞻之间呈弱负相关。这些结果可以推导出两个主要的管理含义。首先,机场竞争会导致起降费上涨。其次,在竞争下,机场不一定有兴趣告知乘客其零售设施。然而,在机场决定是否开展广告宣传活动以告知乘客他们的零售设施时,他们最终陷入了囚徒困境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Free rides to cleaner air? Examining the impact of massive public transport fare discounts on air quality Unionised dockworkers and port ownership structure in an international oligopoly Editorial Board Microgeographic speed, reliability, and traffic externalities Pricing effects of code-sharing in Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1