Development and Psychometric Assessment of a Scale for Measuring Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice About COVID-19

Samaneh Torkian, A. Ahmadi, V. Khosravi, N. Khanjani, Z. Jaafari, M. Morowatisharifabad, Neda Malek Mohammadi
{"title":"Development and Psychometric Assessment of a Scale for Measuring Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice About COVID-19","authors":"Samaneh Torkian, A. Ahmadi, V. Khosravi, N. Khanjani, Z. Jaafari, M. Morowatisharifabad, Neda Malek Mohammadi","doi":"10.34172/ijer.2022.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aims: Knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) toward coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are important factors for adherence to protection strategies. The aim of this study was to construct and validate a questionnaire about the KAP of Iranians regarding COVID-19. Methods: Initially, a questionnaire about the KAP with regard to COVID-19 was constructed in this cross-sectional study. The initial questionnaire was prepared based on a review of the extensive research literature and global and national guidelines. This researcher-made questionnaire was developed using the COVID-19-KAP questionnaire, which was originally used in China in 2020, and the influenza epidemic KAP Questionnaire (2015), the MERS KAP Questionnaire (2015), the H1N1 flu KAP questionnaire (2017), and the WHO KAP questionnaire about COVID-19. The applied questionnaire consists of three parts including knowledge- (n=26), attitude- (n=8), and practice-related (n=11) questions, respectively. Then, the face, content, and construct validity and the reliability of the questionnaire was determined, and analyzes were performed using SPSS v. 26 and AMOS v. 24 software. Results: In the face validity stage, 2 questions with an impact score of less than 1.5 were excluded from the questionnaire. In the content validity check, all questions had a content validity index (I-CVI) of more than 0.7. However, the content validity ratio (CVR) for 6 questions was less than 0.51, and these questions were removed accordingly. The compliance of the CVI with the chance agreement was close to one for all questions, indicating the lack of a chance agreement. In the exploratory factor analysis stage, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value of 0.90 was obtained, implying the adequacy of the sample size for factor analysis. The significance of the Bartlett test (chi-square: 5820.06, df: 630, P<0.001) indicated a strong correlation between the questions and the appropriateness of factor analysis. Finally, 34 items in 4 domains remained in the questionnaire. Conclusion: The validity and reliability of this questionnaire were confirmed based on the findings. This Farsi KAP questionnaire can be used to assess the level of knowledge, attitude, and practice of people about COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":73448,"journal":{"name":"International journal of epidemiologic research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of epidemiologic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijer.2022.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) toward coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are important factors for adherence to protection strategies. The aim of this study was to construct and validate a questionnaire about the KAP of Iranians regarding COVID-19. Methods: Initially, a questionnaire about the KAP with regard to COVID-19 was constructed in this cross-sectional study. The initial questionnaire was prepared based on a review of the extensive research literature and global and national guidelines. This researcher-made questionnaire was developed using the COVID-19-KAP questionnaire, which was originally used in China in 2020, and the influenza epidemic KAP Questionnaire (2015), the MERS KAP Questionnaire (2015), the H1N1 flu KAP questionnaire (2017), and the WHO KAP questionnaire about COVID-19. The applied questionnaire consists of three parts including knowledge- (n=26), attitude- (n=8), and practice-related (n=11) questions, respectively. Then, the face, content, and construct validity and the reliability of the questionnaire was determined, and analyzes were performed using SPSS v. 26 and AMOS v. 24 software. Results: In the face validity stage, 2 questions with an impact score of less than 1.5 were excluded from the questionnaire. In the content validity check, all questions had a content validity index (I-CVI) of more than 0.7. However, the content validity ratio (CVR) for 6 questions was less than 0.51, and these questions were removed accordingly. The compliance of the CVI with the chance agreement was close to one for all questions, indicating the lack of a chance agreement. In the exploratory factor analysis stage, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value of 0.90 was obtained, implying the adequacy of the sample size for factor analysis. The significance of the Bartlett test (chi-square: 5820.06, df: 630, P<0.001) indicated a strong correlation between the questions and the appropriateness of factor analysis. Finally, 34 items in 4 domains remained in the questionnaire. Conclusion: The validity and reliability of this questionnaire were confirmed based on the findings. This Farsi KAP questionnaire can be used to assess the level of knowledge, attitude, and practice of people about COVID-19.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎知识、态度和实践量表的开发和心理测量评估
背景和目的:对2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)的知识、态度和实践(KAP)是遵守保护策略的重要因素。本研究的目的是构建并验证一份关于伊朗人新冠肺炎KAP的问卷。方法:首先,在这项横断面研究中构建了一份关于新冠肺炎KAP的问卷。最初的调查问卷是在对广泛的研究文献以及全球和国家指导方针进行审查的基础上编制的。本研究问卷采用2020年中国首次使用的COVID-19-KAP问卷,以及流感流行KAP问卷(2015年)、MERS KAP调查问卷(2015)、H1N1流感KAP调查调查表(2017年)和世界卫生组织关于新冠肺炎的KAP问卷。应用问卷由三部分组成,分别包括知识(n=26)、态度(n=8)和实践相关(n=11)问题。然后,确定问卷的面、内容、结构的有效性和可靠性,并使用SPSS v.26和AMOS v.24软件进行分析。结果:在面孔有效性阶段,2个影响得分低于1.5的问题被排除在问卷之外。在内容有效性检查中,所有问题的内容有效性指数(I-CVI)均大于0.7。然而,6个问题的内容有效性比率(CVR)小于0.51,这些问题被相应地删除。CVI对机会协议的遵守程度接近于所有问题的一致性,这表明缺乏机会协议。在探索性因子分析阶段,获得了0.90的Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin(KMO)值,这意味着因子分析的样本量足够。Bartlett检验的显著性(卡方:5820.06,df:630,P<0.001)表明问题与因素分析的适当性之间存在很强的相关性。最后,问卷中还有4个领域的34个项目。结论:本调查问卷的有效性和可靠性得到了验证。该波斯语KAP问卷可用于评估人们对新冠肺炎的知识、态度和实践水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association of Severe Outcomes With Underlying Diseases Among Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Towards COVID-19 in Iran: A Population-Based Study The Role of Age Groups in Improving Life Expectancy of Iran During 1976-2016 Nucleus Accumbens Fractional Anisotropy and Children’s Body Mass Index: Moderating Role of Race and Family Income Is There a Need to Assess the Health Status of School-Age Students When Reopening Schools Following the COVID-19 Pandemic?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1