Fiction as Counter Memory: Writing Armenia and Palestine in Aline Ohanesian’s Orhan’s Inheritance and Susan Abulhawa’s Mornings in Jenin

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE COLLEGE LITERATURE Pub Date : 2021-10-27 DOI:10.1353/lit.2021.0044
N. Fischer, K. Mitchell
{"title":"Fiction as Counter Memory: Writing Armenia and Palestine in Aline Ohanesian’s Orhan’s Inheritance and Susan Abulhawa’s Mornings in Jenin","authors":"N. Fischer, K. Mitchell","doi":"10.1353/lit.2021.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article examines the role fiction plays in retrieving pasts that have been suppressed or occluded within dominant narratives by grafting these counter memories onto memorable forms. It investigates the way two novels, Susan Abulhawa’s Mornings in Jenin (2010) and Aline Ohanesian’s Orhan’s Inheritance (2015), guide us to rethink well-known narratives that shape our understanding of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the negotiations around the recognition of the Armenian genocide, respectively. These novels aim not only to portray the past but to rework, rewrite, and interrogate it. In addition to revising a contested past for an international readership, we argue these novels are “meta-mnemonic”; they stage the process of historical recollection, both individual and collective, and thereby interrogate the ways past events accrue meaning for future generations. The novels’ use of literary techniques like multiple temporal perspectives, characters of different nationalities, and interwoven narratives present a nuanced, multi-perspectival understanding of the past, one which resists a simple repositioning of blame. Instead, these authors challenge their readers to revise their understanding of the past and create bridges between different versions of history. In so doing, they carve for literature a potent role in the formation of collective memory. Taken together, Mornings in Jenin and Orhan’s Inheritance demonstrate the political power novels can have if conceived as a part of a national, ethnic, or religious memory-making process, not only to continually explore the past and attest to its ongoing effects but to imagine transformed futures.","PeriodicalId":44728,"journal":{"name":"COLLEGE LITERATURE","volume":"48 1","pages":"738 - 767"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COLLEGE LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2021.0044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article examines the role fiction plays in retrieving pasts that have been suppressed or occluded within dominant narratives by grafting these counter memories onto memorable forms. It investigates the way two novels, Susan Abulhawa’s Mornings in Jenin (2010) and Aline Ohanesian’s Orhan’s Inheritance (2015), guide us to rethink well-known narratives that shape our understanding of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the negotiations around the recognition of the Armenian genocide, respectively. These novels aim not only to portray the past but to rework, rewrite, and interrogate it. In addition to revising a contested past for an international readership, we argue these novels are “meta-mnemonic”; they stage the process of historical recollection, both individual and collective, and thereby interrogate the ways past events accrue meaning for future generations. The novels’ use of literary techniques like multiple temporal perspectives, characters of different nationalities, and interwoven narratives present a nuanced, multi-perspectival understanding of the past, one which resists a simple repositioning of blame. Instead, these authors challenge their readers to revise their understanding of the past and create bridges between different versions of history. In so doing, they carve for literature a potent role in the formation of collective memory. Taken together, Mornings in Jenin and Orhan’s Inheritance demonstrate the political power novels can have if conceived as a part of a national, ethnic, or religious memory-making process, not only to continually explore the past and attest to its ongoing effects but to imagine transformed futures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为反记忆的小说——从阿琳·奥哈内西安的《奥尔汉的继承》和苏珊·阿布哈瓦的《杰宁的早晨》看亚美尼亚和巴勒斯坦
摘要:本文通过将这些反记忆移植到令人难忘的形式上,探讨了小说在找回被压制或被遮蔽在主流叙事中的过去方面所扮演的角色。它调查了苏珊·阿布哈瓦(Susan Abulhawa)的《杰宁的早晨》(2010年)和阿琳·奥哈尼西安(Aline Ohanesian)的《奥尔汉的继承》(2015年)这两部小说如何引导我们重新思考众所周知的叙事,这些叙事分别塑造了我们对以色列-巴勒斯坦冲突的理解,以及围绕承认亚美尼亚种族灭绝的谈判。这些小说不仅旨在描绘过去,而且旨在对过去进行改写、改写和审问。除了为国际读者修改有争议的过去,我们认为这些小说是“元记忆”;他们上演了个人和集体的历史回忆过程,从而质疑过去事件对后代产生意义的方式。小说使用了多种时间视角、不同民族的人物和交织的叙事等文学技巧,呈现了对过去细致入微、多视角的理解,这种理解抵制了简单的指责重新定位。相反,这些作者挑战读者修改他们对过去的理解,并在不同版本的历史之间架起桥梁。在这样做的过程中,他们为文学在集体记忆的形成中发挥了强有力的作用。总之,《杰宁的早晨》和《奥尔汉的继承》表明,如果将政治权力小说视为国家、种族或宗教记忆制作过程的一部分,不仅可以不断探索过去并证明其持续的影响,还可以想象改变的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
COLLEGE LITERATURE
COLLEGE LITERATURE LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Science, Michel Serres, and the Topological Poetics of A. R. Ammons Literature and Professional Society: Modernism, Aesthetics, and Ian McEwan's Saturday Academic and Conversational Genre: Revisionist Visions of Anti-Racist Rhetoric in Claudia Rankine's Just Us The Twentieth-Century Adaptation of the Captivity Narrative and the Act of Looking in Elmore Leonard's Western Stories Hanif Kureishi's Passages of Queerness: Diasporic Sensualities and the Creation of Selves
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1