The surrogate labor of the eye: Farocki, Papa, and the eeefff collective

IF 0.4 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES Journal of Aesthetics & Culture Pub Date : 2022-12-13 DOI:10.1080/20004214.2022.2156754
Tereza Stejskalová
{"title":"The surrogate labor of the eye: Farocki, Papa, and the eeefff collective","authors":"Tereza Stejskalová","doi":"10.1080/20004214.2022.2156754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The following essay explores the work of art as a site of encounter with human perceptual labor that plays a role in technical operations. It tackles the way such labor is deemed obsolete, soon to be replaced, and therefore surrogate even if it actually animates and reproduces automated vision systems. It explores how art goes about representing the ways in which such labor is undervalued and unrecognized. The text argues for reading in between the lines and images of Harun Farocki’s films, installations, and writings where the obsolescence of human labor emerges more as an ideological screen than a fact. It focuses on moments in his oeuvre which indicate that human labor, including cognition as automation’s last frontier, is not automated away but persists, changes site, undergoes restructuring, and becomes more hidden. More recent works by the eeefff collective and Elisa Giardina Papa explore the intertwined roles of human affection and vision labor in the necessarily failed attempts to teach machines to see and feel, to “clean” the algorithmic vision and affection from opacity and the queerness of real life. Both artists leave behind Farocki’s self-reflexive, detached spectator to involve the audience in more situated and embodied experiences of perception labor and the particular ways in which such labor has become outsourced and dispersed in semi-peripheries such as Sicily or Belarus. They try to express the price that people pay with their emotions and bodies for such work. Yet, in principle, they follow Farocki’s take on labor’s in/visibility in that they challenge the ruling ideologies that blind human vision to the realities of labor. The essay also pays attention to the ways in which both artistic and technical vision today are pre-determined by the logic of the gig economy.","PeriodicalId":43229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aesthetics & Culture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aesthetics & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20004214.2022.2156754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The following essay explores the work of art as a site of encounter with human perceptual labor that plays a role in technical operations. It tackles the way such labor is deemed obsolete, soon to be replaced, and therefore surrogate even if it actually animates and reproduces automated vision systems. It explores how art goes about representing the ways in which such labor is undervalued and unrecognized. The text argues for reading in between the lines and images of Harun Farocki’s films, installations, and writings where the obsolescence of human labor emerges more as an ideological screen than a fact. It focuses on moments in his oeuvre which indicate that human labor, including cognition as automation’s last frontier, is not automated away but persists, changes site, undergoes restructuring, and becomes more hidden. More recent works by the eeefff collective and Elisa Giardina Papa explore the intertwined roles of human affection and vision labor in the necessarily failed attempts to teach machines to see and feel, to “clean” the algorithmic vision and affection from opacity and the queerness of real life. Both artists leave behind Farocki’s self-reflexive, detached spectator to involve the audience in more situated and embodied experiences of perception labor and the particular ways in which such labor has become outsourced and dispersed in semi-peripheries such as Sicily or Belarus. They try to express the price that people pay with their emotions and bodies for such work. Yet, in principle, they follow Farocki’s take on labor’s in/visibility in that they challenge the ruling ideologies that blind human vision to the realities of labor. The essay also pays attention to the ways in which both artistic and technical vision today are pre-determined by the logic of the gig economy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼睛的代工:法罗基,爸爸,和eeefff集体
摘要以下文章探讨了艺术作品作为一个与在技术操作中发挥作用的人类感知劳动相遇的场所。它解决了这种劳动力被认为是过时的、很快就会被取代的问题,因此即使它真的对自动视觉系统进行了动画化和复制,它也会成为替代品。它探讨了艺术是如何表现这种劳动被低估和不被认可的方式的。文本主张在哈伦·法罗基的电影、装置和作品的线条和图像之间进行阅读,在这些作品中,人类劳动的过时更多地表现为意识形态的屏幕,而不是事实。它聚焦于他作品中的一些时刻,这些时刻表明,人类的劳动,包括作为自动化最后前沿的认知,并没有被自动化,而是持续存在,改变了地点,经历了重组,变得更加隐蔽。eeefff集体和Elisa Giardina Papa最近的作品探讨了人类情感和视觉劳动在教机器看和感觉、从现实生活的不透明和怪异中“清除”算法视觉和情感的必然失败的尝试中相互交织的作用。两位艺术家都抛弃了Farocki的自我反射、超然的观众,让观众参与到感知劳动的更情境、更具体的体验中,以及这种劳动外包和分散在西西里岛或白俄罗斯等半边缘地区的特殊方式中。他们试图用情感和身体来表达人们为这类工作付出的代价。然而,原则上,他们遵循了Farocki对劳工存在/可见性的看法,因为他们挑战了统治意识形态,这些意识形态使人类的视野对劳工的现实视而不见。本文还关注了零工经济的逻辑如何预先决定当今的艺术和技术愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
What AI “art” can teach us about art The standardized, mechanized, and annotated body. Fragmentation as cultural technique in recent video works by Kajsa Dahlberg, Kalle Brolin, and Hanni Kamaly The unbearable lightness of objects: Günter Figal’s spatial aesthetics The vertical axis and the agôn between theatre and philosophy “Whose roar is it, anyway? Localization and ideological communication with respect to the toho Godzilla franchise”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1