Authenticity ahead of interdisciplinarity – a scoping review of student experiences in interdisciplinary science projects

J. Hart, E. Bone
{"title":"Authenticity ahead of interdisciplinarity – a scoping review of student experiences in interdisciplinary science projects","authors":"J. Hart, E. Bone","doi":"10.21153/jtlge2022vol13no1art1487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interdisciplinary projects are reported to facilitate the development of both disciplinary and generic skills. They vary in their design and implementation, but the effectiveness of different project models has not been studied. The aim of this study was to determine student satisfaction, engagement with learning and development of employability skills across interdisciplinary projects with different delivery models.\nThis scoping review appraises interdisciplinary projects implemented in science-based undergraduate degree programs. Projects with varying models of delivery, interdisciplinarity, authenticity and external partner involvement were examined, and the reported student learning and satisfaction ratings compared. Descriptive statistics and cross tabulation using Fisher’s Exact test were used to analyse the data.\nThe interdisciplinary project model had little effect on engagement with learning, but student satisfaction improved if the project task was rated as authentic (p<0.05). Improved learning was reported in about half of the projects reviewed. Improved employability was reported in projects where students used discipline-based skills to provide a consultancy (p<0.05), and those where an external partner was involved (p<0.05).\nThe interdisciplinary project model did not affect disciplinary or employability skill development, apart from interdisciplinary competence, which was significantly improved in a truly interdisciplinary project (p<0.01). Interpersonal skill development was significantly improved where projects had integrated rather than sequential tasks (p<0.05).\nOverall, interdisciplinary projects that were authentic and/or involved an external partner generated better student satisfaction and real-world experience. These results inform the future design of interdisciplinary project-based learning tasks and encourage involvement of external partners in project design and delivery.","PeriodicalId":37004,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2022vol13no1art1487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interdisciplinary projects are reported to facilitate the development of both disciplinary and generic skills. They vary in their design and implementation, but the effectiveness of different project models has not been studied. The aim of this study was to determine student satisfaction, engagement with learning and development of employability skills across interdisciplinary projects with different delivery models. This scoping review appraises interdisciplinary projects implemented in science-based undergraduate degree programs. Projects with varying models of delivery, interdisciplinarity, authenticity and external partner involvement were examined, and the reported student learning and satisfaction ratings compared. Descriptive statistics and cross tabulation using Fisher’s Exact test were used to analyse the data. The interdisciplinary project model had little effect on engagement with learning, but student satisfaction improved if the project task was rated as authentic (p<0.05). Improved learning was reported in about half of the projects reviewed. Improved employability was reported in projects where students used discipline-based skills to provide a consultancy (p<0.05), and those where an external partner was involved (p<0.05). The interdisciplinary project model did not affect disciplinary or employability skill development, apart from interdisciplinary competence, which was significantly improved in a truly interdisciplinary project (p<0.01). Interpersonal skill development was significantly improved where projects had integrated rather than sequential tasks (p<0.05). Overall, interdisciplinary projects that were authentic and/or involved an external partner generated better student satisfaction and real-world experience. These results inform the future design of interdisciplinary project-based learning tasks and encourage involvement of external partners in project design and delivery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
真实性先于跨学科——跨学科科学项目中学生经历的范围审查
据报告,跨学科项目有助于学科和通用技能的发展。它们在设计和实施方面各不相同,但尚未研究不同项目模型的有效性。本研究的目的是确定不同交付模式的跨学科项目中的学生满意度、学习参与度和就业能力发展。本范围审查评估了以科学为基础的本科学位项目中实施的跨学科项目。研究了具有不同交付模式、跨学科性、真实性和外部合作伙伴参与的项目,并对报告的学生学习和满意度进行了比较。描述性统计和交叉表使用Fisher精确检验来分析数据。跨学科项目模式对参与学习的影响很小,但如果项目任务被评为真实的,学生的满意度会提高(p<0.05)。据报道,大约一半的审查项目的学习情况有所改善。据报道,在学生使用基于学科的技能提供咨询的项目中,就业能力得到了提高(p<0.05),在有外部合作伙伴参与的项目中(p<0.05)。跨学科项目模式不影响学科或就业能力技能的发展,除了跨学科能力,在真正的跨学科项目中,这一点得到了显著改善(p<0.01)。在项目整合而非顺序任务的情况下,人际技能发展得到了显著提高(p<0.05)。总的来说,真实和/或涉及外部合作伙伴的跨学科目标会产生更好的学生满意度和现实世界体验。这些结果为未来跨学科项目学习任务的设计提供了信息,并鼓励外部合作伙伴参与项目设计和交付。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
External aspects that stand out in the self-perceived employability of engineering students and recent graduates The nexus of work integrated learning and skills among engineering students in Nigerian Universities: A structural equation model approach External aspects that stand out in the self-perceived employability of engineering students and recent graduates The nexus of work integrated learning and skills among engineering students in Nigerian Universities: A structural equation model approach Exploring the role of generic competencies in employability and academic performance of students of psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1