A Cross-Cultural Study on the Capability Development Difference of Educational Management Technology in China and the West

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 AREA STUDIES African and Asian Studies Pub Date : 2021-12-14 DOI:10.1163/15692108-12341513
Ying Wang, Qiuzhu Chen
{"title":"A Cross-Cultural Study on the Capability Development Difference of Educational Management Technology in China and the West","authors":"Ying Wang, Qiuzhu Chen","doi":"10.1163/15692108-12341513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nAgainst the background of “Internet plus,” western countries have taken a lead in modernizing educational management technology to fit the times. The application of education management technology in China is in a period of rapid development. There are certain differences between China and western countries. In order to adapt to the intelligent trend of contemporary education management reform and improve the national macro education management level, there should be cross-cultural thinking on the differences in the development of educational management technology capabilities between China and the West. Based on the literature analysis of Chinese and Western education management technology and education management theory, and based on the research data of 8 domestic colleges and universities education management technology, we explored the development differences between China and the West in teaching evaluation, multimedia teaching, and teaching decision-making. The results showed that ideology, national conditions and technology are the main influencing factor of the differences in the development of educational management technology capabilities between China and the West. We need to create a cross-cultural education concept conflict, cross-cultural perspective to re-plan the teacher’s positioning, and fundamentally change the concept of teachers to accept Western education management models in China. The application proportion of education management technology should be allocated based on the actual teaching situation, to increase the teaching utilization rate of multimedia equipment, and reduce unnecessary multimedia teaching. Data-driven intelligent teaching decision-making technology should be developed to guide teaching behavior scientifically and efficiently. Finally, we should construct a modern management system in line with national conditions, as well as narrow the gap between Chinese and western educational management.","PeriodicalId":54087,"journal":{"name":"African and Asian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African and Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15692108-12341513","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Against the background of “Internet plus,” western countries have taken a lead in modernizing educational management technology to fit the times. The application of education management technology in China is in a period of rapid development. There are certain differences between China and western countries. In order to adapt to the intelligent trend of contemporary education management reform and improve the national macro education management level, there should be cross-cultural thinking on the differences in the development of educational management technology capabilities between China and the West. Based on the literature analysis of Chinese and Western education management technology and education management theory, and based on the research data of 8 domestic colleges and universities education management technology, we explored the development differences between China and the West in teaching evaluation, multimedia teaching, and teaching decision-making. The results showed that ideology, national conditions and technology are the main influencing factor of the differences in the development of educational management technology capabilities between China and the West. We need to create a cross-cultural education concept conflict, cross-cultural perspective to re-plan the teacher’s positioning, and fundamentally change the concept of teachers to accept Western education management models in China. The application proportion of education management technology should be allocated based on the actual teaching situation, to increase the teaching utilization rate of multimedia equipment, and reduce unnecessary multimedia teaching. Data-driven intelligent teaching decision-making technology should be developed to guide teaching behavior scientifically and efficiently. Finally, we should construct a modern management system in line with national conditions, as well as narrow the gap between Chinese and western educational management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中西教育管理技术能力发展差异的跨文化研究
在“互联网+”的背景下,西方国家率先实现了教育管理技术的现代化,以适应时代的需要。我国教育管理技术的应用正处于快速发展时期。中国和西方国家有一些不同。为了适应当代教育管理改革的智能化趋势,提高国家宏观教育管理水平,应该对中西方教育管理技术能力发展的差异进行跨文化思考。基于对中西方教育管理技术和教育管理理论的文献分析,并基于国内8所高校教育管理技术的研究数据,探讨了中西方在教学评价、多媒体教学、教学决策等方面的发展差异。结果表明,意识形态、国情和技术是中西方教育管理技术能力发展差异的主要影响因素。我们需要营造一种跨文化的教育观念冲突,用跨文化的视角重新规划教师的定位,从根本上改变教师观念,接受西方的中国教育管理模式。教育管理技术的应用比例应根据教学实际情况进行分配,以提高多媒体设备的教学利用率,减少不必要的多媒体教学。应开发数据驱动的智能教学决策技术,科学高效地指导教学行为。最后,我们应该构建一个符合国情的现代管理体系,并缩小中西方教育管理的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The journal presents a scholarly account of studies of individuals and societies in Africa and Asia. Its scope is to publish original research by social scientists in the area of anthropology, sociology, history, political science and related social sciences about African and Asian societies and cultures and their relationships. The journal focuses on problems and possibilities, past and future. Where possible, comparisons are made between countries and continents. Articles should be based on original research and can be co-authored.
期刊最新文献
Islamic Eschatology and Prophetic Register: the Divine Source of Pakistan’s Identity Rethinking the Dynamics of Fighting Covid-19 in Jordan: Social Exchange Perspective Youth Employability Training Model from the Perspective of Education Poverty Reduction in Kenya and Its Enlightenment to China The Decentralised Governance in Kenya: Implications on Citizen Participation in the Local Governance Maritime Culture And Everyday Life In Nineteenth-And-Twentieth-Century Coastal Ghana: A Social History of Cape Coast, written by Kwaku Nti
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1