Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions of Assessment Tasks that Measure Content Knowledge for Teaching about Matter

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Science Teacher Education Pub Date : 2022-02-09 DOI:10.1080/1046560X.2021.2015831
Dante Cisterna, Allison K. Bookbinder, Jamie N. Mikeska, Heena Lakhani
{"title":"Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions of Assessment Tasks that Measure Content Knowledge for Teaching about Matter","authors":"Dante Cisterna, Allison K. Bookbinder, Jamie N. Mikeska, Heena Lakhani","doi":"10.1080/1046560X.2021.2015831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Developing knowledge about science instruction is critical for preservice teachers. This study explores how 79 elementary preservice teachers perceive the relevance and importance of assessment task scenarios designed to elicit information about content knowledge for teaching (CKT) about matter and its interactions—a foundational topic for teaching physical science. Participants completed practice-based assessment tasks that described teaching scenarios about elementary science teaching and that addressed five matter topics: properties of matter, changes in matter, the model of matter, materials, and conservation of matter. We aimed to explore how relevant preservice teachers felt these task scenarios were to their teaching experience and how important knowing how to answer these tasks was for the work of elementary teachers. Findings suggest that preservice teachers tended to recognize the centrality of these task scenarios for the work typically done in elementary classrooms, even if they do not report having firsthand experience with the content and practices represented in the scenarios. Moreover, participants tended to provide a general rationale about why these scenarios were important for the work of teaching science, but a limited number of responses made explicit connections between a task scenario and the specific instructional practice related to elementary teachers’ work. This study poses implications for the use of CKT tasks in elementary education programs.","PeriodicalId":47326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science Teacher Education","volume":"33 1","pages":"910 - 937"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.2015831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Developing knowledge about science instruction is critical for preservice teachers. This study explores how 79 elementary preservice teachers perceive the relevance and importance of assessment task scenarios designed to elicit information about content knowledge for teaching (CKT) about matter and its interactions—a foundational topic for teaching physical science. Participants completed practice-based assessment tasks that described teaching scenarios about elementary science teaching and that addressed five matter topics: properties of matter, changes in matter, the model of matter, materials, and conservation of matter. We aimed to explore how relevant preservice teachers felt these task scenarios were to their teaching experience and how important knowing how to answer these tasks was for the work of elementary teachers. Findings suggest that preservice teachers tended to recognize the centrality of these task scenarios for the work typically done in elementary classrooms, even if they do not report having firsthand experience with the content and practices represented in the scenarios. Moreover, participants tended to provide a general rationale about why these scenarios were important for the work of teaching science, but a limited number of responses made explicit connections between a task scenario and the specific instructional practice related to elementary teachers’ work. This study poses implications for the use of CKT tasks in elementary education programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小学职前教师对物质教学内容知识评估任务的认知
培养科学教学知识对职前教师来说至关重要。本研究探讨了79名小学职前教师如何感知评估任务场景的相关性和重要性,该任务场景旨在引出关于物质及其相互作用的内容知识教学(CKT)的信息,这是物理科学教学的一个基础主题。参与者完成了基于实践的评估任务,这些任务描述了基础科学教学的教学场景,并涉及五个物质主题:物质的性质、物质的变化、物质的模型、材料和物质守恒。我们旨在探讨相关职前教师对这些任务情景对他们的教学经验的感受,以及知道如何回答这些任务对小学教师的工作有多重要。研究结果表明,职前教师倾向于认识到这些任务场景在小学课堂上通常完成的工作中的中心地位,即使他们没有报告对场景中所代表的内容和实践有第一手经验。此外,参与者倾向于提供为什么这些场景对科学教学工作很重要的一般理由,但数量有限的回答在任务场景和与小学教师工作相关的具体教学实践之间建立了明确的联系。这项研究对基础教育项目中CKT任务的使用提出了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Science Teacher Education
Journal of Science Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Journal of Science Teacher Education (JSTE) is the flagship journal of the Association for Science Teacher Education. It serves as a forum for disseminating high quality research and theoretical position papers concerning preservice and inservice education of science teachers. The Journal features pragmatic articles that offer ways to improve classroom teaching and learning, professional development, and teacher recruitment and retention at pre K-16 levels.
期刊最新文献
Where’s the Peanut Butter? Journaling about Science Practices in Everyday Life Integrating Text Structure Instruction in Science Education: A Design-Based Study What Makes this Lesson Engineering? What Makes it Science? Examining the Thought Processes of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers Science Teacher Action Research in Top Tier Science Education Journals: A Review of the Literature Integrated Language and Science & Technology Instruction: A Cognitive Task Analysis of the Required Teacher Expertise
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1